<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Withhold Increment Archives - CENTRAL GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES NEWS</title>
	<atom:link href="https://centralgovernmentnews.com/tag/withhold-increment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://centralgovernmentnews.com/tag/withhold-increment/</link>
	<description>All about Central Government Employees News. Get the central govt employees latest news, DoPT Orders, 7th Pay Commission, DA Hike, latest notification for pensioners, MACP latest order, da for central government employees, and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2015 03:02:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>2 Increment days proposal ignored by 7th Pay Commission</title>
		<link>https://centralgovernmentnews.com/2-increment-days-proposal-ignored-by-7th-pay-commission/</link>
					<comments>https://centralgovernmentnews.com/2-increment-days-proposal-ignored-by-7th-pay-commission/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2015 06:29:49 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[7CPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[7th Central Pay Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[7th CPC Increment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Annual Increment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Increment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Increment Calculation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Withhold Increment]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://centralgovernmentnews.com/?p=12110</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>2 Increment days proposal ignored by 7th Pay Commission There is no explanation in the report of 7th CPC about the suggestion regarding the 2 Increment Days in respect of Central Government employees given by the NC JCM Staff Side. Prior to the 6th Pay Commission, there was separate increment date for each central government [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://centralgovernmentnews.com/2-increment-days-proposal-ignored-by-7th-pay-commission/">2 Increment days proposal ignored by 7th Pay Commission</a> appeared first on <a href="https://centralgovernmentnews.com">CENTRAL GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES NEWS</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>2 Increment days proposal ignored by 7th Pay Commission</b></p>
<p>There is no explanation in the report of 7th CPC about the suggestion regarding the 2 Increment Days in respect of Central Government employees given by the NC JCM Staff Side.</p>
<p class="separator"><img decoding="async" class=" aligncenter" title="7th CPC" src="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-aNLrzNLxtYY/VnoN6mUrMjI/AAAAAAAAAoo/JCPe3Mh0HHA/s1600/7th-cpc.jpg" alt="7th CPC" border="0" /></p>
<p>Prior to the 6th Pay Commission, there was separate increment date for each central government employees. Sixth Pay Commission recommended uniform increment date for all the central government employees and the new conditions for granting of increment. As per the sixth CPC recommendations, Government servants completing six months and above in the same Grade Pay as on 1st of July are eligible to be granted the Increment.</p>
<div>
<p>One who joins duty on or after 2nd January 2015, will get his annual increment on 1st July of next year i.e after rendering 17 months of service.</p>
</div>
<div></div>
<div>
<p>In such a way, those who are retiring on 30th June are denied annual increment even after completing 12 months’ service in same Grade pay.</p>
</div>
<div></div>
<div></div>
<div>
<p>The NC JCM had highlighted such anomalies in detail to the 7th Pay Commission. To remove these anomalies NCJCM Staff Side has proposed to recommend two increment dates at the interval of six months i.e 1st January and 1st July of every year. It is expected that, if it is accepted by 7th CPC, it will address the above issues. But unfortunately 7th CPC didn’t accept this proposal and said nothing about that.</p>
</div>
<div></div>
<div>
<p>Further, it followed same recommendation of sixth cpc that granting 3% increment on 1st July of every year . But nothing has been said about the criteria for annual increment to be granted. Hence in the context of no recommendation has been made on conditions for granting annual increment, it can be assumed that the prevailing conditions for granting annual increment to be followed.</p>
</div>
<div></div>
<div>
<p>So consequent upon implementation of 7th pay commission, there will be no relevance in respect of attendance on 1st January for granting annual increment for serving employees. Finally, the method implemented by the 6th Pay Commission, regarding the qualifications of employees to receive the annual increments, is very likely to continue after 01.01.2016.</p>
</div>
<div></div>
<div>
<p>But the commission is proposing withholding of annual increments in the case of those employees who are not able to meet the benchmark either for MACP or a regular promotion within the first 20 years of their service.</p>
</div>
<div></div>
<p>An illustration of annual increment calculation given in the report…</p>
<p class="separator"><img decoding="async" src="https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-PPArmSt2N1I/VnoOGm4VoCI/AAAAAAAAAow/iug8GrC1eVM/s1600/increment-calculation-in-7th-cpc.png" alt="" width="100%" border="0" /></p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://7thpaycommissionnews.in/2-increment-days-proposal-ignored-by-7th-pay-commission/" data-blogger-escaped-target="_blank">7thpaycommissionnews.in</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://centralgovernmentnews.com/2-increment-days-proposal-ignored-by-7th-pay-commission/">2 Increment days proposal ignored by 7th Pay Commission</a> appeared first on <a href="https://centralgovernmentnews.com">CENTRAL GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES NEWS</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://centralgovernmentnews.com/2-increment-days-proposal-ignored-by-7th-pay-commission/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Imposition of un-warranted quantum of minor penalty &#8211; Railway Board to NFIR</title>
		<link>https://centralgovernmentnews.com/imposition-of-un-warranted-quantum-of-minor-penalty-railway-board-to-nfir/</link>
					<comments>https://centralgovernmentnews.com/imposition-of-un-warranted-quantum-of-minor-penalty-railway-board-to-nfir/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 01:38:37 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[DOPT Orders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Railways]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CCS(Conduct) Rules]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Imposition of Un-warranted quantum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minor Penalty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NFIR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NFIR Latest News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PTO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Railway Board Orders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sensure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Withhold Increment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Withhold of Passes]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://centralgovernmentnews.com/?p=1129</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Imposition of un-warranted quantum of minor penalty &#8211; Railway Board to NFIR Railway Board replied to NFIR regarding the subject of &#8220;Imposition of un-warranted quantum of minor penalty&#8221; GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF RAILWAYS (RAILWAY BOARD) No.E(D&#38;A) 2012 RG6-17 New Delhi, 5.11.2012 The General Secretary National Federation of Indian Railwaymen, 3, Chelmsford Road, New Delhi [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://centralgovernmentnews.com/imposition-of-un-warranted-quantum-of-minor-penalty-railway-board-to-nfir/">Imposition of un-warranted quantum of minor penalty &#8211; Railway Board to NFIR</a> appeared first on <a href="https://centralgovernmentnews.com">CENTRAL GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES NEWS</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Imposition of un-warranted quantum of minor penalty &#8211; Railway Board to NFIR</strong></p>
<div><strong>Railway Board replied to NFIR regarding the subject of &#8220;</strong><strong>Imposition of un-warranted quantum of minor penalty&#8221;</strong></div>
<div></div>
<div style="text-align: center;"><strong>GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</strong></div>
<div style="text-align: center;"><strong>MINISTRY OF RAILWAYS</strong></div>
<div style="text-align: center;"><strong>(RAILWAY BOARD)</strong></div>
<div></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">No.E(D&amp;A) 2012 RG6-17</div>
<div style="text-align: right;">New Delhi, 5.11.2012</div>
<div style="text-align: right;">The General Secretary</div>
<div style="text-align: right;">National Federation of Indian Railwaymen,</div>
<div style="text-align: right;">3, Chelmsford Road,</div>
<div style="text-align: right;">New Delhi &#8211; 110 055.</div>
<div></div>
<div>Sub: <strong>Imposition of un-warranted quantum of minor penalty &#8211; reg.</strong></div>
<div></div>
<div>Sir,</div>
<div>I am directed to refer to your Federation&#8217;s letter No. II/5 dated 2/7/2012 on the above subject and to stae that as per Western Railway&#8217;s report no instance of withholding of 100 sets of Passes and 100 sets of PTOs have come to notice on Bhavnagar Division. In so far as withholding of 30 sets of Passes and 40 sets of PTOs of a PWI on Vadodara Division is concerned, the application authority has already reduced the penalty to &#8216;withholding of three sets of pass&#8217; on 1.3.2012.</div>
<div></div>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<div> The federation will appreciate that existing rules already have provisions to look into orders of Disciplinary authority withholding a large number of Pass/PTOs. Guidelines (extracts enclosed) laying down that withholding of a large number a Passes/PTOs is not in keeping with the spirit of rules have also been issued under Master Circular No. 66 on &#8220;Penalties and Disciplinary Authorities&#8221; (Item No. 12 (iii)- Withholding of Passes/PTOs). (Pages 7&amp;8). Any amendment in the rules is neither considered feasible of acceptance nor appears to be necessary.</div>
<div></div>
<div>DA: Extracts of Master</div>
<div>Cirucular No.66</div>
<div>(Pages 7&amp;8)</div>
<div></div>
<div style="text-align: right;">Yours faithfully,</div>
<div style="text-align: right;">sd/-</div>
<div style="text-align: right;">For Secretary, Railway Board</div>
<div></div>
<div></div>
<div></div>
<div>9. <strong>Censure</strong> :</div>
<div>If at the end of the proceedings, it is found that some blame attaches to a Railway Servant, warning/Govt. Displeasure/Counselling which are not recognised penalties, should not be imposed, In such cases, at leastr the penalty of Censure should be imposed. (Board&#8217;s letter No.E(D&amp;A)92 RG 6-149(A)/(B) dt 21.1.93.)</div>
<div></div>
<div>10. <strong>Withholding of promotion</strong> :</div>
<div>Even though withholding of promotion is a specified penalty under Rules 6, non promotion during the currency of the penalty of withholding of increment etc., will not amount to imposition of two penalties. A denial of Promotion in such circumstances is not a further penalty but a necessary consequence of his conduct.</div>
<div>(Board&#8217;s letter No.E(D&amp;A)91 RG 6-68 dt. 22/29.10.91)</div>
<div></div>
<div>11. <strong>Recovery of Loss :</strong></div>
<div>(i) In cases of loss caused to the Government by negligence, breach of orders, etc., on the part of an employee, it would be open to the competent authority to inflict, in addition to the penalty of recovery from pay of the loss caused, any one of the penalties specified in clauses 1 (i), (ii) and (iv) and clauses 2 (i) and (ii) of Rules 1707-RI (1959 Edition) (equivalent to the penalties specified in Rule 6 (i), (ii), iii(a), iii(b), (iv) and (vi) of RS(D&amp;A) Rules, 1968), by way of one and the same order and in pursuance of one and the same proceddings, It would not amount to double punishment.</div>
<div>(Board&#8217;s letter No.E(D&amp;A)62 RG 6-26 dt. 17.5.62).</div>
<div></div>
<div>(ii) In the case of large sums of recovery of losses, the instalments can be so fixed as not to cause undue hardship to the Railway Servant and his family.</div>
<div>(Board&#8217;s letter No.E(D&amp;A) 2000 RG6-64 dt. 30.1.2001)</div>
<div></div>
<div>12. <strong>Withholding of Passes/PTOs</strong></div>
<div>(i) The penalty of withholding of Passes/PTOs for a period of less than one year should be restricted to very minor offences as it may not prove to be an effective punishment, except for the slight inconvenience that may be caused during the period of the punishment since the employee can avail of all the Passes/PTOs due in the calendar year as soon as the period of punishment expires.</div>
<div>(Rly. Board&#8217;s letter No. E(D&amp;A)61 RG 6-34 dt. 27.7.61).</div>
<div></div>
<div>(ii) In order to make the penalty of withholding of Passes/PTOs effective, the penalty should be imposed in terms of sets instead of for a specified period. In cases where the employee has already taken all the Passes/PTOs due in the calendar year, the withholding may be against the next year&#8217;s account</div>
<div>(Rly. Board&#8217;s letter No. E(D&amp;A)66 RG 6-57 dated 14.12.1966).</div>
<div></div>
<div>iii) Though no ceiling has been laid down in RS(D&amp;A) Rules with regard to number of sets of Passes/PTOs which can be withheld, withholding of a large number of Passes/PTOs is not in keeping with the spirit of Rules as also the fact that this is a minor penalty which can be imposed without regular inquiry.</div>
<div>(D.O letter No.E(D&amp;A)97 RG 6-6 dt. 19/25.3.97 to N.E. Rly.)</div>
<div></div>
<div>(iv) Post-retirement complimentary Passes cannot be withheld as a penalty under the RS(D&amp;A) Rules for offences committed during the service. The only penalty in such cases is a cut in the pensionary benefits under Rule 2308-RII (now incorporated as Rule 9 of Railway Servants (Pension) Rules, 1993).</div>
<div>(Rly. Board&#8217;s letter No.E(D&amp;A)89 RG-56 dt. 29.5.89)</div>
<div></div>
<div>However, post-retirement complimentary passes can be disallowed in accordance with the provisions and procedure laid down in the Railway Servants (Pass) Rules for unauthorised retention of Railway quarter. For this purpose, provisions of RS(D&amp;A) Rules need not be invoked.</div>
<div>(Rly. Board&#8217;s letter No.E(W)99 PS-5I/41 dt. 3.11.99)</div>
<div></div>
<div>13. <strong>Withholding of Increment :</strong></div>
<div>(i) If a Railway Servant becomes due for promotion after the penalty of withholding of increment is imposed, he should be promoted only after expiry of the penalty. However, where the penalty of withholding of increment is to become operative from a future date, the employee should be promoted in his turn and the penalty imposed in the promotional grade for a period which would not result in a grater monetary loss.</div>
<div></div>
<div>(Rly. Board&#8217;s letter No.E(D&amp;A)92 RG6-149(A) dt. 21.1.93 in respect of non-gazetted staff and No.E(D&amp;A)92 RG-185 dt. 12.2.93 in respect of officers).</div>
<div></div>
<div>Source : NFIR</div>
<p>The post <a href="https://centralgovernmentnews.com/imposition-of-un-warranted-quantum-of-minor-penalty-railway-board-to-nfir/">Imposition of un-warranted quantum of minor penalty &#8211; Railway Board to NFIR</a> appeared first on <a href="https://centralgovernmentnews.com">CENTRAL GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES NEWS</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://centralgovernmentnews.com/imposition-of-un-warranted-quantum-of-minor-penalty-railway-board-to-nfir/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
