<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ncjcmstaffside Archives - CENTRAL GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES NEWS</title>
	<atom:link href="https://centralgovernmentnews.com/tag/ncjcmstaffside/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://centralgovernmentnews.com/tag/ncjcmstaffside/</link>
	<description>All about Central Government Employees News. Get the central govt employees latest news, DoPT Orders, 7th Pay Commission, DA Hike, latest notification for pensioners, MACP latest order, da for central government employees, and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2019 06:03:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>National Council (JCM) Dharna on 28th March is delayed</title>
		<link>https://centralgovernmentnews.com/national-council-jcm-dharna-on-28th-march-is-delayed/</link>
					<comments>https://centralgovernmentnews.com/national-council-jcm-dharna-on-28th-march-is-delayed/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2019 06:03:32 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Employees News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Confederation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JCM Dharna]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JCM Members]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ncjcmstaffside]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://centralgovernmentnews.com/?p=23991</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>National Council (JCM) Dharna on 28th March is delayed All the Constituent Organizations of National Council (JCM) Sub:- Holding of regular meetings of the National Council (JCM), Standing Committee of the National Council (JCM) and the Departmental Council (JCM) as per the JCM Scheme &#8211; deferment of the proposed Dharna at Delhi on 28th of [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://centralgovernmentnews.com/national-council-jcm-dharna-on-28th-march-is-delayed/">National Council (JCM) Dharna on 28th March is delayed</a> appeared first on <a href="https://centralgovernmentnews.com">CENTRAL GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES NEWS</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p style="text-align:center"><strong>National Council (JCM) Dharna on 28th March is delayed</strong></p>



<p style="text-align:center">All the Constituent Organizations of National Council (JCM)</p>



<p>Sub:- <strong>Holding of regular meetings of the National Council (JCM), Standing Committee of the National Council (JCM) and the Departmental Council (JCM) as per the JCM Scheme &#8211; deferment of the proposed Dharna at Delhi on 28th of March, 2019.</strong></p>



<p>Ref:-DOPT letter F.No.3/1/2019-JCA dated 22/3/2019</p>



<p>Dear Comrades,</p>



<p>Cabinet Secretary already fix the meeting of the National Council (JCM) on 13/4/2019 vide letter referred above (copy enclosed).</p>



<p>In view of above a dharna proposed by JCM Members on 28th March 2019 has been deferred in consultation with the principle Office Bearers of various Federations.</p>



<p style="text-align:right">With greetings,</p>



<p style="text-align:right">Yours Comradely,<br />(Shiva Gopal Mishra)<br />Convener</p>



<p>Source : Confederation</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://centralgovernmentnews.com/national-council-jcm-dharna-on-28th-march-is-delayed/">National Council (JCM) Dharna on 28th March is delayed</a> appeared first on <a href="https://centralgovernmentnews.com">CENTRAL GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES NEWS</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://centralgovernmentnews.com/national-council-jcm-dharna-on-28th-march-is-delayed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Confederation: Meeting of the Standing Committee of National Council (JCM)</title>
		<link>https://centralgovernmentnews.com/confederation-meeting-of-the-standing-committee-of-national-council-jcm/</link>
					<comments>https://centralgovernmentnews.com/confederation-meeting-of-the-standing-committee-of-national-council-jcm/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2019 15:45:07 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Employees News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dopt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JCM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Council Meeting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NC/JCM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ncjcmstaffside]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://centralgovernmentnews.com/?p=23821</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Meeting of DOPT &#38; NCJCM on 7th March 2019 Staff Side MEETING NOTICE F.No.3/1/2018-JCA-1 Government of India Ministry of Personnel, PG &#38; Pensions Department of Personnel &#38; Training Establishment (JCA-2) Section North Block, New Delhi Dated February 28, 2019 Meeting Notice Subject : Meeting of the Standing Committee of National Council (JCM) regarding. The next [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://centralgovernmentnews.com/confederation-meeting-of-the-standing-committee-of-national-council-jcm/">Confederation: Meeting of the Standing Committee of National Council (JCM)</a> appeared first on <a href="https://centralgovernmentnews.com">CENTRAL GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES NEWS</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p style="text-align:center"><em>Meeting of DOPT &amp; NCJCM  on 7th March 2019</em></p>



<p style="text-align:right">Staff Side<br />
MEETING NOTICE</p>



<p style="text-align:center">F.No.3/1/2018-JCA-1<br />
Government of India<br />
Ministry of Personnel, PG &amp; Pensions<br />
Department of Personnel &amp; Training<br />
Establishment (JCA-2) Section</p>



<p style="text-align:right">North Block, New Delhi<br />
Dated February 28, 2019</p>



<p style="text-align:center"><strong>Meeting Notice</strong></p>



<p><strong>Subject : Meeting of the Standing Committee of National Council (JCM) regarding.</strong></p>



<p>The next meeting of Standing Committee of National Council (JCM) under the Chairmanship of Secretary (P) is scheduled to be held on 07.03.2019 (Thursday) at 3.30 PM in Room No. 119, North Block, New Delhi.</p>



<p>Kindly make it convenient to attend the meeting.</p>



<p style="text-align:right">(Juglal Singh)<br />
Deputy Secretary (JCA)</p>



<p>Source : Confederation</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://centralgovernmentnews.com/confederation-meeting-of-the-standing-committee-of-national-council-jcm/">Confederation: Meeting of the Standing Committee of National Council (JCM)</a> appeared first on <a href="https://centralgovernmentnews.com">CENTRAL GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES NEWS</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://centralgovernmentnews.com/confederation-meeting-of-the-standing-committee-of-national-council-jcm/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>INDWF: Minutes of National Anomaly Committee Meeting</title>
		<link>https://centralgovernmentnews.com/indwf-minutes-of-national-anomaly-committee-meeting/</link>
					<comments>https://centralgovernmentnews.com/indwf-minutes-of-national-anomaly-committee-meeting/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2018 07:39:37 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[DOPT Orders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[7th Pay Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CGE LATEST NEWS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dopt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DoPT Orders 2018]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HOT NEWS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[INDWF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LATEST-DOPT- ORDERS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ncjcmstaffside]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://centralgovernmentnews.com/?p=20651</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>INDWF: Minutes of National Anomaly Committee Meeting F.No.11/2/2016-JCA-I(Pt.) Government of India Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances &#38; Pensions Department of Personnel Training North Block, New Delhi Dated: 16 February, 2018 To Shri Shiv Gopal Mishra Secretary, Staff-Side National Council (Staff Side) Joint Consultative Machinery for, Central Government Employees 13-C, Ferozeshah Road, New Delhi-110001 Subject: Minutes [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://centralgovernmentnews.com/indwf-minutes-of-national-anomaly-committee-meeting/">INDWF: Minutes of National Anomaly Committee Meeting</a> appeared first on <a href="https://centralgovernmentnews.com">CENTRAL GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES NEWS</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>INDWF: Minutes of National Anomaly Committee Meeting</strong></p>
<p align="center"><strong>F.No.11/2/2016-JCA-I(Pt.)</strong><br />
<strong>Government of India</strong><br />
<strong>Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances &amp; Pensions</strong><br />
<strong>Department of Personnel Training</strong></p>
<p align="right">North Block, New Delhi<br />
Dated: 16 February, 2018</p>
<p>To</p>
<p>Shri Shiv Gopal Mishra<br />
Secretary, Staff-Side<br />
National Council (Staff Side)<br />
Joint Consultative Machinery for, Central Government Employees<br />
13-C, Ferozeshah Road, New Delhi-110001</p>
<p><strong>Subject: Minutes of the Meeting held on 11.01.2018 to discuss the admissibility of the agenda items received from the Staff Side, NC (JCM) for discussion in the National Anomaly Committee (NAC) for the 7th Central Pay Commission.</strong></p>
<p>Sir,</p>
<p>Please find enclosed a copy of the Minutes of the meeting held under the Chairmanship of Joint Secretary (Establishment) on Thursday the 11th January, 2018 at 1500 hours in Room No. 190, conference Room, North Block, New Delhi with the representatives of Staff Side, NC(JCM) for information and necessary action.</p>
<p>2. As per discussion in the above meeting, Staff Side may please reconsider their views on Item No. 7. A copy of the recording during the meeting enclosed for per usual.</p>
<p align="right"><strong>Yours faithfully,</strong><br />
<strong>S/d,<br />
(D.K. Sengupta)</strong><br />
<strong>Deputy Secretary to the Government of India</strong><br />
<strong>Tel. 23040255</strong></p>
<p><strong>MINUTES OF THE MEETING HELD ON 11.01.2018 TO DISCUSS THE ADMISSIBILITY OF THE AGENDA ITEMS RECEIVED FROM THE STAFF SIDE FOR DISCUSSION IN THE NATIONAL ANOMALY COMMITTEE (NAC) FOR THE 7TH CENTRAL PAY COMMISSION</strong></p>
<p>A meeting was held under the chairmanship of Shri G.D. Tripathi, Joint Secretary (Establishment), Department of Personnel &amp; Training with the representatives of Staff Side of the National Anomaly Committee and senior officers from the other Ministries/Departments concerned at 3.00 p.m. on 11.01.2018 in Room No. 190, North Block, DoPT, New Delhi to consider the admissibility of the 18 items of anomaly forwarded by the Staff-Side of the National Council of JCM for settlement through discussion at the NAC constituted after the Seventh Central Pay Commission. The list of participants is at Annexure.</p>
<p>2. The Chairman welcomed the representatives of the Staff-Side of the National Anomaly Committee and asked Deputy Secretary (JCA) to briefly inform the participants the purpose for convening this meeting.</p>
<p>3. Deputy Secretary (JCA) informed that following the acceptance of the recommendations &#8211; to the extent they have been &#8211; of the 7th Central Pay Commission by the Government, the National Anomaly Committee has been constituted by DoPT. Subsequently, on receipt of a representation from the Staff Side, NC(JCM), the definition of what would constitute an anomaly has been revised and notified. Therefore, as per the revised scope of definition, anomaly will include the following cases;</p>
<blockquote><p>a) Where the Official-Side and the Staff-Side are of the opinion that any recommendation is in contravention of the principle or the policy enunciated by the Seventh Central Pay Commission itself without the Commission assigning any reason;</p>
<p>b) Where the maximum of the Level in the Pay Matrix corresponding to the applicable Grade Pay in the Pay Band under the pre-revised structure as notified vide CCS(RP) Rules 2016, is less than the amount an employee is entitled to be fixed at, as per the formula for fixation of pay contained in the said Rules;</p>
<p>c) Where the Official side and the Staff Side are of the opinion that the vertical and horizontal relativities have been disturbed as a result of the 7th Central Pay Commission to give rise to anomalous situation.</p></blockquote>
<p>4. Deputy Secretary (JCA) mentioned that a letter dated 16.08.2017 had been received from Secretary, Staff-Side proposing to discuss 15 items in the National Anomaly Committee (NAC). Subsequently, another letter dated 31.08.2017 was also received proposing 3 additional items. On examining these 18 items against the three (03) yardsticks as stated in para-3 above, it was felt that while some agenda items clearly fall within the definition of &#8216;anomaly&#8217;, there are a few which cannot be termed &#8216;anomaly&#8217; as such, bordering more, as they are, on the side of &#8216;demands&#8217;. There are a few more which apparently by virtue of affecting the interests of one Department should rather be taken up at the Departmental Anomaly Committee. On sharing the findings of this Preliminary examination with the Secretary, Staff-Side, a communication was received from him suggesting inter-alia, besides giving their own reasons for retaining the same agenda &#8211; except one item &#8211; for the NAC deliberations, that a meeting be convened to discuss and finalize the items so as to to avoid delay in convening the NAC meeting.</p>
<p>5. The Chairman then requested the leader of the Staff-Side and other members to put across their points of view on the issue.</p>
<p>6. The Leader, Staff-Side, thanked the Chairman for convening the meeting at the suggestion of Secretary, Staff-Side and initiated the discussion by emphasising that the next meeting of the National Council under the Chairmanship of Cabinet Secretary should be held urgently as more than 7 years have passed since the last such meeting was held. He referred to the background against which the JCM scheme has been institutionalized and stressed that the purpose of JCM is to avoid confrontation between the Government and its employees. He requested that the sentiments of the Staff-Side may be conveyed to the Cabinet Secretary so that the meeting of the National Council, JCM may be held without any further delay. He also suggested that the Cabinet Secretary should meet the Standing Committee of the National Council, JCM soon after the Republic Day celebrations so that the deliberations can be be held on all pending issues. The Leader, Staff-Side further stated that there are many issues arising out of the 7th Central Pay Commission&#8217;s recommendations which are still to be settled to the satisfaction of the Staff-Side. He particularly mentioned about the recommendations relating to New Pension Scheme, Minimum Pay, Fitment Formula, etc.</p>
<p>7. Secretary, Staff-Side also expressed similar views about lack of interaction between the Official-Side and the Staff-Side. He mentioned that the institutions of JCM machinery has become defunct and stated that the meetings of the Standing Committee and the National Council, JCM should be called without any further delay. He also mentioned that the Group of Ministers had met the staff representatives and given some assurances for favourable consideration regarding the Minimum Pay and Fitment Formula. But even after 1-1/2 years, no decision has been conveyed by the Government. He regretted that inspite of the report submitted by NPS Committee, nothing fruitful has been done for bringing new pensioners under defined and guaranteed pension scheme. He stated that based on the assurance given by the group of Ministers, the Staff Side had deferred the call for strike but now it is getting very difficult for them to control the resentments of the staff. He stressed the need for frequent interactions so that each side can appreciate the other&#8217;s views. He also mentioned that no decision has yet been conveyed on the 6th CPC related unresolved anomalies which, the Staff-Side feels, should be sent for arbitration as the Staff-Side has recorded its dissatisfaction on them.</p>
<p><strong>(Action: D/o Pension &amp; JCA Division, DoPT)</strong></p>
<p>8. The Staff-Side members representing M/o Defence stated that they are on a hunger fast joining with the 4 lakhs Defence Civilian Employees to protest against the various decisions taken by Ministry of Defence against their interest. They lodged their protest aginst what they called &#8216;arbitary&#8217; policy decisions made by the Government about outsourcing of jobs hitherto done in the ordince factories, converting Army Base Workshops to GOCO Model, closure of Station Workshops, Military Farms and Depots under Army Headquarters thereby rendering 31,000 Employees surplus including 9000 employees of Military Engineer Service, granting Uniform Allowance to the soldiers by stopping the practice of getting them stitched through almost 12000 Employees in 5 Ordnance Factories etc. This is against the assurance given by the Defence Ministry in the past to the Staff Side that the jobs being performed by ordnance factories would be outsourced. They also protested against the violation of the direction of Cabinet Secretary by the Ministry of Defence in that the Staff Side has not been consulted before deciding on outsourcing, closure, merger, declaring manpower surplus etc. They demanded that MoD may be directed to immediately hold discussions with the Staff Side and settle the issues in the interest of the Defence Industry and its employees</p>
<p><strong>(Action: M/o Defence)</strong></p>
<p>9. The Staff Side also raised the following issues:-</p>
<blockquote><p>a) The demand of the Staff Side for extension of the date of option for switching over to 7th CPC Pay Scales from a date on which the employee got promotion/MACP is not yet settled. Necessary instructions may be issued in this regard.</p>
<p><strong>(Action: Establishment Division, DoPT)</strong></p>
<p>b) The Report of the NPS Committee even though submitted to the Government in August, 2017 the Staff Side is not yet given a copy of the same. The same may be given to the Staff Side and a meeting may also be held with the Staff Side by the Government before taking any decision on the recommendations of the NPS Committee.</p>
<p><strong>(Action: D/o P &amp; PW)</strong></p>
<p>c) The Staff Side also pointed out what they felt arbitrariness of the decision of the Government to close down the various printing presses without even holding any discussion with the Staff Side. The employees have been asked to immediately get themselves, relived and join at faraway places. They added that assurances were given by the Cabinet Secretary at the National Council that the Government would discuss the problems faced by the staff and resolve the same in all cases when the Government decides to wind up any of its functions.</p></blockquote>
<p><strong>(Action: M/o Urban Development)</strong></p>
<p>10. The Chairman stated that he has taken note of all the concerns expressed by the Leader, Staff-Side, Secretary Staff-Side and the other representatives of the Staff-Side. He stated that the work on finalizing the comments on the Agenda for the meeting with the National Council, JCM has been going on and another two weeks would be required to finalize the comments and thereafter the convenience of the Cabinet Secretary would be sought so that the meeting of the Standing Committee can be held in the month of February, 2018. He stated that the purpose of today&#8217;s meeting was to familiarize with the issues as well as to arrive at a mutually agreed decisions as to which of them should be taken up for discussion and settlement at the NAC so that the first meeting can be convened at the earliest. He further emphasised that the items on which the Government, has held a view different from that of the 7th CPC would not be taken up for discussion at the NAC since the Government decisions on them are well-thought-out and conscious ones. However, where there is a disagreement between what has been recommended and what the 7th CPC should have recommended as part of its policy/principles would figure in NAC discussion.</p>
<p>11. It was seen that there are seven (7) proposed items which clearly fall within the definition of &#8216;Anomaly&#8217;. At the conclusion of the discussions, the following was agreed to in respect of the remaining eleven (11) items:</p>
<table border="1" width="100%" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" bgcolor="#DFF7E2"><strong>Item No.</strong></td>
<td valign="top" bgcolor="#EBFAED"><strong>Description</strong></td>
<td valign="top" bgcolor="#EEFBF0"><strong>Decision</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" bgcolor="#DFF7E2"><strong>1</strong></td>
<td valign="top" bgcolor="#EBFAED">Anomaly in computation of minimum wage</td>
<td valign="top" bgcolor="#EEFBF0">In view of the response of Secretary, Staff-Side, the JCA Division will re-examine.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" bgcolor="#DFF7E2"><strong>2</strong></td>
<td valign="top" bgcolor="#EBFAED">3% Increment in all stages</td>
<td valign="top" bgcolor="#EEFBF0">In view of the response of Secretary, Staff-Side, the JCA Divison will re-examine</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" bgcolor="#DFF7E2"><strong>6</strong></td>
<td valign="top" bgcolor="#EBFAED">Remove Anomaly due to index rationalization</td>
<td valign="top" bgcolor="#EEFBF0">In view of the response of Secretary, Staff-Side, the JCA Divison will re-examine</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" bgcolor="#DFF7E2"><strong>7</strong></td>
<td valign="top" bgcolor="#EBFAED">Anomaly arising from the decision to reject option No.1 in pension fixation</td>
<td valign="top" bgcolor="#EEFBF0">Sent back to Staff-Side for reconsideration of its views</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" bgcolor="#DFF7E2"><strong>10</strong></td>
<td valign="top" bgcolor="#EBFAED">Minimum Pension</td>
<td valign="top" bgcolor="#EEFBF0">The Staff-Side will take up this issue with the Department of Pension &amp; Pensioners Welfare separately. This will not be treated as an anomaly.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" bgcolor="#DFF7E2"><strong>11</strong></td>
<td valign="top" bgcolor="#EBFAED">Date of effect of Allowances- HRA, Transport</p>
<p>Allowance, CEA etc</td>
<td valign="top" bgcolor="#EEFBF0">Thil will be taken up separately as an item in the Standing Committee meeting</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" bgcolor="#DFF7E2"><strong>12.</strong></td>
<td valign="top" bgcolor="#EBFAED">Implement the recommendation on Parity in Pay Scale between Sr. Auditors / Sr. Accountant of 1A &amp; AD and organized Accounts with Assistant Section Officer of CSS.</td>
<td valign="top" bgcolor="#EEFBF0">As this was already under examination in the Department of Personnel &amp; Training it would not be taken up for</p>
<p>discussion in NAC at this stage. If it remains undecided at the later stage,</p>
<p>it will be included for discussion in NAC.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" bgcolor="#DFF7E2"><strong>13</strong></td>
<td valign="top" bgcolor="#EBFAED">Parity in pay scales between Assistants/</p>
<p>Stenographers in field/ subordinate offices and Assistant Section Offices and Stenographers in CSS</td>
<td valign="top" bgcolor="#EEFBF0">The Staff-Side, NC (JCM) will provide additional details</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" bgcolor="#DFF7E2"><strong>15</strong></td>
<td valign="top" bgcolor="#EBFAED">Technical Supervisors of Railways</td>
<td valign="top" bgcolor="#EEFBF0">The Staff-Side, NC(JCM) will take up this issue at the Departmental Anomaly Committee of Ministry of Railways.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" bgcolor="#DFF7E2"><strong>16.</strong></td>
<td valign="top" bgcolor="#EBFAED">Anomaly in the assignment of replacement of Levels of pay in the Ministry of Defence, Railways, Mines etc in the case of Store Keepers.</td>
<td valign="top" bgcolor="#EEFBF0">The Staff-Side, NC (JCM) will take up this issue at the Departmental Anomaly Committee of Ministry of Defence. JCA Division will</p>
<p>write to Ministry of Defence in this regard.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" bgcolor="#DFF7E2"><strong>18.</strong></td>
<td valign="top" bgcolor="#EBFAED">Anomaly in the grant of DA instalment w.e.f.</p>
<p>01.01.2016</td>
<td valign="top" bgcolor="#EEFBF0">In view of the response of Secretary, Staff-Side, the JCA Division will re-examine.</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>12. The meeting concluded with a vote of thanks to the Chair.</p>
<p><strong>LIST OF PARTICIPANTS IN THE PRE-NATIONAL</p>
<p>ANOMALY COMMITTEE OF THE NATIONAL COUNCIL (JCM) HELD ON 11/01/2018</strong></p>
<table border="1" width="100%" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top"><strong>S.No.</strong></td>
<td valign="top"><strong>Staff-Side</strong></td>
<td valign="top"><strong>Official-Side</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top"><strong>1</strong></td>
<td valign="top">Shri Shiv Gopal Misra</td>
<td valign="top">Shri G.D. Tripathi</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top"><strong>2.</strong></td>
<td valign="top">Shri M. Raghavaiah,</td>
<td valign="top">Shri Amar Nath Singh</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top"><strong> 3</strong></td>
<td valign="top">Shri Rakhal Das Gupta</td>
<td valign="top">Shri Harjit Singh</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top"><strong> 4</strong></td>
<td valign="top">Shri J.R. Bhosle</td>
<td valign="top">Ms. Sujasha Choudhury</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top"><strong> 5</strong></td>
<td valign="top">Shri Guman Singh</td>
<td valign="top">Ms. Nirmala Dev.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top"><strong> 6</strong></td>
<td valign="top">Shri C.Srikumar</td>
<td valign="top">Shri Jaya Kumar.G.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top"><strong> 7</strong></td>
<td valign="top">Shri K.K.N. Kutty</td>
<td valign="top">Shri A.K. Jain</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top"><strong> 8</strong></td>
<td valign="top">Shri Sankara Rao</td>
<td valign="top">Shri Charanjit Taneja</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top"><strong> 9</strong></td>
<td valign="top">Shri R. Srinivasan</td>
<td valign="top">Shri Rajeev Kumar Bahree</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top"><strong> 10</strong></td>
<td valign="top">Shri R.P. Bhatnagar</td>
<td valign="top">Shri Ram Gopal</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Source : <a href="https://indwf.blogspot.in/">INDWF</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://centralgovernmentnews.com/indwf-minutes-of-national-anomaly-committee-meeting/">INDWF: Minutes of National Anomaly Committee Meeting</a> appeared first on <a href="https://centralgovernmentnews.com">CENTRAL GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES NEWS</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://centralgovernmentnews.com/indwf-minutes-of-national-anomaly-committee-meeting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Revision of Minimum Wages payable to Temporary status Casual Labourers</title>
		<link>https://centralgovernmentnews.com/revision-of-minimum-wages-payable-to-temporary-status-casual-labourers/</link>
					<comments>https://centralgovernmentnews.com/revision-of-minimum-wages-payable-to-temporary-status-casual-labourers/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2018 07:08:20 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Employees News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[6th CPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[7CPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[7th CPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[7th Pay Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Casual Labourers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Central Government Employees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CGE LATEST NEWS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Confederationhq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emporary status Casual Labourers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[minimum wages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minimum Wages payable]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ncjcmstaffside]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pay matrix]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://centralgovernmentnews.com/?p=20367</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Revision of Minimum Wages payable to Temporary status Casual Labourers Ref: Confdn/Genl/2016-19 Dated &#8211; 25.01.2018 To, Shri Ajay Mittal Secretary Department of Personnel &#38; Training Ministry of Personnel, PG and Pension Government of India North Block, New Delhi &#8211; 110001 Sir, Sub:  Revision of Minimum Wages payable to Temporary status Casual Labourers &#8211; reg. Ref: [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://centralgovernmentnews.com/revision-of-minimum-wages-payable-to-temporary-status-casual-labourers/">Revision of Minimum Wages payable to Temporary status Casual Labourers</a> appeared first on <a href="https://centralgovernmentnews.com">CENTRAL GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES NEWS</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div data-blogger-escaped-style="text-align: justify;">
<p><b>Revision of Minimum Wages payable to Temporary status Casual Labourers</b></p>
</div>
<div data-blogger-escaped-style="text-align: justify;">
<p>Ref: Confdn/Genl/2016-19</p>
</div>
<div data-blogger-escaped-style="text-align: right;">
<p style="text-align: right;">Dated &#8211; 25.01.2018</p>
</div>
<div data-blogger-escaped-style="text-align: justify;">
<p>To,<br />
Shri Ajay Mittal<br />
Secretary<br />
Department of Personnel &amp; Training<br />
Ministry of Personnel, PG and Pension<br />
Government of India</p>
<p style="text-align: right;">North Block, New Delhi &#8211; 110001</p>
</div>
<div data-blogger-escaped-style="text-align: justify;">
<p>Sir,</p>
</div>
<div data-blogger-escaped-style="text-align: justify;">
<p><b>Sub:  Revision of Minimum Wages payable to Temporary status Casual Labourers &#8211; reg.</b></p>
</div>
<div data-blogger-escaped-style="text-align: justify;">
<p>Ref: Your office letter No. 49014/1/2017-Estt (C) dated 16th August 2017.</p>
</div>
<div data-blogger-escaped-style="text-align: justify;">
<p>Please refer to your office letter cited above copy of which is enclosed herewith for ready reference. It was informed that the matter of revision of wages payable to Temporary status Casual Labourers is under consideration.</p>
</div>
<div data-blogger-escaped-style="text-align: justify;">
<p>We regret to inform you that the orders of revising the wages of Temporary status Casual Labourers with effect from 01.01.2016 is yet to be issued, eventhough the orders revising the pay of Central Government employees was issued on 25.07.2016.</p>
</div>
<div data-blogger-escaped-style="text-align: justify;">
<p>It is once again requested to take necessary action in this regard, so that issuing of orders will be expedited.</p>
</div>
<div data-blogger-escaped-style="text-align: justify;">
<p>Encls: as above</p>
</div>
<div data-blogger-escaped-style="text-align: right;">
<p>With regards,</p>
</div>
<div data-blogger-escaped-style="text-align: right;">
<p style="text-align: right;">Yours faithfully,<br />
(M. Krishnan)</p>
</div>
<div data-blogger-escaped-style="text-align: justify;">
<p>Member, Standing Committee<br />
National Council JCM &amp; Secretary General,<br />
Confederation of Central Govt.Employees &amp; Workers<br />
Mob: 09447068125<br />
Email: mkrishnan6854@gmail.com</p>
</div>
<div data-blogger-escaped-style="text-align: justify;"> Source : Confederationhq</div>
<p>The post <a href="https://centralgovernmentnews.com/revision-of-minimum-wages-payable-to-temporary-status-casual-labourers/">Revision of Minimum Wages payable to Temporary status Casual Labourers</a> appeared first on <a href="https://centralgovernmentnews.com">CENTRAL GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES NEWS</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://centralgovernmentnews.com/revision-of-minimum-wages-payable-to-temporary-status-casual-labourers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Granting of 7th CPC Pay Scale to Temporary Service Casual Labourers  w.e.f  1.1.2016</title>
		<link>https://centralgovernmentnews.com/granting-of-7th-cpc-pay-scale-to-temporary-service-casual-labourers-w-e-f-1-1-2016/</link>
					<comments>https://centralgovernmentnews.com/granting-of-7th-cpc-pay-scale-to-temporary-service-casual-labourers-w-e-f-1-1-2016/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2018 07:02:04 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[7CPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[6th CPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[7th CPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[7th Pay Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Confederationhq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ncjcmstaffside]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pay matrix]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://centralgovernmentnews.com/?p=20365</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Granting of 7th CPC Pay Scale to Temporary Service Casual Labourers w.e.f 1.1.2016 Temporary  Casual Labourers are deployed in regular jobs. They are granted regular pay scale of Labourers and DA admissible for regular employees. They are granted 7000+1800 GP after 6th CPC recommendations were implemented w.e.f 1.1.2016 during 2009. After 7th CPC recommendations are [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://centralgovernmentnews.com/granting-of-7th-cpc-pay-scale-to-temporary-service-casual-labourers-w-e-f-1-1-2016/">Granting of 7th CPC Pay Scale to Temporary Service Casual Labourers  w.e.f  1.1.2016</a> appeared first on <a href="https://centralgovernmentnews.com">CENTRAL GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES NEWS</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Granting of 7th CPC Pay Scale to Temporary Service Casual Labourers w.e.f 1.1.2016</strong></p>
<p>Temporary  Casual Labourers are deployed in regular jobs. They are granted regular pay scale of Labourers and DA admissible for regular employees. They are granted <strong>7000+1800 GP</strong> after <strong>6th CPC</strong> recommendations were implemented w.e.f 1.1.2016 during 2009. After <strong>7th CPC</strong> recommendations are implemented, till date no orders were issued b y Department of Expenditure to revise their pay in level 1 of pay matrix on 7th CPC on par with regular labourers. They are &amp; till drawing the pay scale of 6th CPC. This may be considered and regular pay scale of 7th CPC be granted w.e.f 1.1.2016 to these employees.</p>
<p>Thanking you,</p>
<p style="text-align: right;">yours faithfully,<br />
S/d,<br />
(Shiv Gopal Misra)<br />
Secretary</p>
<p>Source : Confederationhq</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://centralgovernmentnews.com/granting-of-7th-cpc-pay-scale-to-temporary-service-casual-labourers-w-e-f-1-1-2016/">Granting of 7th CPC Pay Scale to Temporary Service Casual Labourers  w.e.f  1.1.2016</a> appeared first on <a href="https://centralgovernmentnews.com">CENTRAL GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES NEWS</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://centralgovernmentnews.com/granting-of-7th-cpc-pay-scale-to-temporary-service-casual-labourers-w-e-f-1-1-2016/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>DOPT : Items proposed by the Staff-Side, NC(JCM) for discussion in the National Anomaly Committee</title>
		<link>https://centralgovernmentnews.com/19735/</link>
					<comments>https://centralgovernmentnews.com/19735/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Nov 2017 07:42:56 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[DOPT Orders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[7CPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Central Government Employee news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dopt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOPT ORDERS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ncjcmstaffside]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://centralgovernmentnews.com/?p=19735</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>DOPT : Items proposed by the Staff-Side, NC(JCM) for discussion in the National Anomaly Committee F.No.11/2/2016-JCA-I(Pt.)  Government of India Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances &#38; Pensions Department of Personnel Training &#160; North Block, New Delhi Dated the 30th October, 2017 To Shri Shiv Gopal Mishra Secretary, Staff-Side National Council, JCM 13-C, Ferozshah Road, New Delhi-110001 [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://centralgovernmentnews.com/19735/">DOPT : Items proposed by the Staff-Side, NC(JCM) for discussion in the National Anomaly Committee</a> appeared first on <a href="https://centralgovernmentnews.com">CENTRAL GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES NEWS</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;"><b>DOPT : Items proposed by the Staff-Side, NC(JCM) for discussion in the National Anomaly Committee</b></div>
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;">
<div style="text-align: center;">F.No.11/2/2016-JCA-I(Pt.)</div>
<p style="text-align: center;"> Government of India<br />
Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances &amp; Pensions<br />
Department of Personnel Training</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<div style="text-align: right;">North Block, New Delhi</div>
<div style="text-align: right;">Dated the 30th October, 2017</div>
<p>To</p>
<p>Shri Shiv Gopal Mishra</p>
<p>Secretary, Staff-Side National Council,</p>
<p>JCM 13-C, Ferozshah Road,</p>
<p>New Delhi-110001</p>
<p><b>Subject:— Items proposed by the Staff-Side, NC(JCM) for discussion in the National Anomaly Committee — Comments of DoPT regarding.</b></p>
<p>Sir,</p>
<p>I am directed to refer to your letters no. NC-JCM-2017/7th CPC Anomaly dated 16th August, 2017 and 31th August, 2017 with which a total of 18 items have been sent to DoPT for discussion in the NAC meetings. These 18 items are about various issues over which, the Staff-Side has opined, anomaly has arisen as a result of the 7th CPC’s recommendations or absence of them.</p>
<p>2. On the other hand, DoPT after examining them in the light of the three postulates which, as described in DoPT’s OM. No. 11/2/2016-JCA dated 16th August, 2016 and 20th February, 2017, would constitute anomaly is of the view that there are certain items in the lists sent which are not in accord with them and hence cannot be called anomalies as such notwithstanding the merit that they may have otherwise. There are also certain items which should be taken up at the Departmental Anomaly Committees of the other administrative Ministries concerned. A few items are those which, for a detailed examination, need more relevant documents/papers etc. These have been briefly described below:</p>
<table class="MsoTableGrid" style="border-collapse: collapse; mso-border-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-padding-alt: 0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt; mso-yfti-tbllook: 1184; width: 100%px;" border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr style="mso-yfti-firstrow: yes; mso-yfti-irow: 0;">
<td style="border: windowtext 1pt solid; mso-border-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; padding: 0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;" valign="top" width="10.54%">
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;" align="justify"><span style="font-family: 'times new roman';"><span style="font-size: 14pt;">Si. No</span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;" align="justify"></div>
</td>
<td style="border-bottom: windowtext 1pt solid; border-left: medium none; border-right: windowtext 1pt solid; border-top: windowtext 1pt solid; mso-border-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-left-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; padding: 0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;" valign="top" width="35.62%">
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;" align="justify"><span style="font-family: 'times new roman';"><span style="font-size: 14pt;">DescriptionAnomaly</span><span style="mso-tab-count: 1;"><span style="font-size: 14pt;">      </span></span></span></div>
</td>
<td style="border-bottom: windowtext 1pt solid; border-left: medium none; border-right: windowtext 1pt solid; border-top: windowtext 1pt solid; mso-border-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-left-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; padding: 0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;" valign="top" width="53.86%">
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;" align="justify"><span style="font-family: 'times new roman';"><span style="font-size: 14pt;">Comments</span></span></div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr style="mso-yfti-irow: 1;">
<td style="border-bottom: windowtext 1pt solid; border-left: windowtext 1pt solid; border-right: windowtext 1pt solid; border-top: medium none; mso-border-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-top-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; padding: 0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;" valign="top" width="10.54%">
<div class="MsoListParagraph" style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt 0.5in; mso-add-space: auto; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1; text-indent: -0.25in;" align="justify"><span style="font-family: 'times new roman';"><span style="mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman';"><span style="mso-list: ignore;"><span style="font-size: 14pt;">1.</span><span style="line-height: normal;"><span style="font-size: 7pt;">     </span></span></span></span><span style="font-size: 14pt;"> </span></span></div>
</td>
<td style="border-bottom: windowtext 1pt solid; border-left: medium none; border-right: windowtext 1pt solid; border-top: medium none; mso-border-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-left-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-top-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; padding: 0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;" valign="top" width="35.62%">
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;" align="justify"><span style="font-family: 'times new roman';"><span style="font-size: 14pt;">Anomaly<span style="mso-tab-count: 1;">     </span>in computation<span style="mso-tab-count: 1;">          </span>of Minimum Wage</span></span></div>
</td>
<td style="border-bottom: windowtext 1pt solid; border-left: medium none; border-right: windowtext 1pt solid; border-top: medium none; mso-border-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-left-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-top-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; padding: 0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;" valign="top" width="53.86%">
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;" align="justify"><span style="font-family: 'times new roman';"><span style="font-size: 14pt;">As<br />
against the Minimum Wage decided to be Rs. 18000/- by the Govt. w.e.f.<br />
01.01.2016, the Staff-Side has said that this should be not less than<br />
Rs. 26,000/-and the multiplication factor ought to have been 3.714 and<br />
not 2.57.</span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;" align="justify"></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;" align="justify"><span style="font-family: 'times new roman';"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"><span style="font-size: 14pt;"> </span></span><span style="font-size: 14pt;">They<br />
have further asked for the pay matrix to be changed. Objecting to the<br />
methodology adopted by the 7th CPC in computing the Minimum Wage, they<br />
have given a number of reasons like the retail prices of the commodities<br />
quoted by the Labour Bureau being irrational, adoption of the 12<br />
monthly average of the retail price being contents to the Dr. Avkrovd f<br />
ormula, the website of the Agriculture Ministry giving the retail prices<br />
of commodities forming the basis of computation of minimum wage<br />
provides a different picture, so on and so forth.</span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;" align="justify"></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;" align="justify"><span style="font-family: 'times new roman';"><span style="font-size: 14pt;">However,<br />
when one compares this item with the three situations given in DoPT’s<br />
OM. No. 11/2/2016-jCA dated 16th August, 2016 and 20th February, 2017,<br />
it does not appear that this satisfies any of them to be treated as an<br />
anomaly.</span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;" align="justify"></div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr style="mso-yfti-irow: 2;">
<td style="border-bottom: windowtext 1pt solid; border-left: windowtext 1pt solid; border-right: windowtext 1pt solid; border-top: medium none; mso-border-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-top-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; padding: 0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;" valign="top" width="10.54%">
<div class="MsoListParagraph" style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt 0.5in; mso-add-space: auto; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1; text-indent: -0.25in;" align="justify"><span style="font-family: 'times new roman';"><span style="mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman';"><span style="mso-list: ignore;"><span style="font-size: 14pt;">2.</span><span style="line-height: normal;"><span style="font-size: 7pt;">     </span></span></span></span><span style="font-size: 14pt;"> </span></span></div>
</td>
<td style="border-bottom: windowtext 1pt solid; border-left: medium none; border-right: windowtext 1pt solid; border-top: medium none; mso-border-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-left-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-top-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; padding: 0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;" valign="top" width="35.62%">
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;" align="justify"><span style="font-family: 'times new roman';"><span style="font-size: 14pt;">3% Increment in all stages</span></span></div>
</td>
<td style="border-bottom: windowtext 1pt solid; border-left: medium none; border-right: windowtext 1pt solid; border-top: medium none; mso-border-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-left-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-top-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; padding: 0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;" valign="top" width="53.86%">
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;" align="justify"><span style="font-family: 'times new roman';"><span style="font-size: 14pt;">The<br />
Staff-Side argues that in spite of the foreword to the Report making it<br />
clear in para 1.19 that the prevailing rate of increment is considered<br />
quite satisfactory and has been retained, an illustrative list appended<br />
by them shows instances where the pay, gone up after the addition of<br />
annual increment by 3%, falls short of what it would have been. They<br />
have quoted para-5.1.38 of the report also which states that the rate of<br />
annual increment would be 3%.</span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;" align="justify"></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;" align="justify"><span style="font-family: 'times new roman';"><span style="font-size: 14pt;">While<br />
what the Staff-Side has stated has its own merits, the fact of the<br />
matter is that the principle followed here is whenever a stage of pay,<br />
after addition of an increment, falls short of the nearest hundred by<br />
less than 50, the employee would be entitled to get the amount mentioned<br />
in the immediately next cell in the Pay-Matrix. However, when the gap<br />
is that of more than 50, the pay, on addition of an increment, is<br />
rounded off to the nearest hundred which travels backward.</span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;" align="justify"></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;" align="justify"><span style="font-family: 'times new roman';"><span style="font-size: 14pt;">For<br />
instance, if staying at Rs. 46,100/- one gets an increment @ 3%,<br />
instead of having his/her pay fixed at Rs. 47,483/- (which is the exact<br />
figure), it will be Rs. 47,500/- (thus gaining by Rs. 13/-). Thus it is<br />
not a case of permanent loss as the loss in one year is made good in the<br />
second/third year. Considering this to he a situation of swings and<br />
roundabouts, this may not be treated as a case of anomaly.</span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;" align="justify"></div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr style="mso-yfti-irow: 3;">
<td style="border-bottom: windowtext 1pt solid; border-left: windowtext 1pt solid; border-right: windowtext 1pt solid; border-top: medium none; mso-border-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-top-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; padding: 0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;" valign="top" width="10.54%">
<div class="MsoListParagraph" style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt 0.5in; mso-add-space: auto; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1; text-indent: -0.25in;" align="justify"><span style="font-family: 'times new roman';"><span style="mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman';"><span style="mso-list: ignore;"><span style="font-size: 14pt;">3.</span><span style="line-height: normal;"><span style="font-size: 7pt;">     </span></span></span></span><span style="font-size: 14pt;"> </span></span></div>
</td>
<td style="border-bottom: windowtext 1pt solid; border-left: medium none; border-right: windowtext 1pt solid; border-top: medium none; mso-border-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-left-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-top-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; padding: 0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;" valign="top" width="35.62%">
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;" align="justify"><span style="font-family: 'times new roman';"><span style="font-size: 14pt;">Anomaly due to index rationalization</span></span></div>
</td>
<td style="border-bottom: windowtext 1pt solid; border-left: medium none; border-right: windowtext 1pt solid; border-top: medium none; mso-border-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-left-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-top-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; padding: 0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;" valign="top" width="53.86%">
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;" align="justify"><span style="font-family: 'times new roman';"><span style="font-size: 14pt;">The<br />
Staff-Side has taken exception to the index rationalization followed by<br />
the 7th CPC while formulating its views as per which the fitment factor<br />
varies and moves upward as one goes up the hierarchical ladder with the<br />
level of responsibility and accountability also steadily climbing up<br />
commensurately. The Staff-Side argues that the multiplication factor<br />
should be one, i.e. 2.81.</span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;" align="justify"><span style="font-family: 'times new roman';"><span style="font-size: 14pt;">Although the Staff-Side has remonstrated that</span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;" align="justify"><span style="font-family: 'times new roman';"><span style="font-size: 14pt;">the<br />
vertical relativity will suffer distortion in the process, it has to be<br />
stated that it is a policy decision about by the Staff-Side comes to be<br />
distorted when the pay of a feeder-cadre post and that of a promotional<br />
post becomes same. In this case it is not </span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;" align="justify"><span style="font-family: 'times new roman';"><span style="font-size: 14pt;">so. Hence it does not appear to qualify for being called an anomaly.</span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;" align="justify"></div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr style="mso-yfti-irow: 4;">
<td style="border-bottom: windowtext 1pt solid; border-left: windowtext 1pt solid; border-right: windowtext 1pt solid; border-top: medium none; mso-border-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-top-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; padding: 0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;" valign="top" width="10.54%">
<div class="MsoListParagraph" style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt 0.5in; mso-add-space: auto; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1; text-indent: -0.25in;" align="justify"><span style="font-family: 'times new roman';"><span style="mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman';"><span style="mso-list: ignore;"><span style="font-size: 14pt;">4.</span><span style="line-height: normal;"><span style="font-size: 7pt;">     </span></span></span></span><span style="font-size: 14pt;"> </span></span></div>
</td>
<td style="border-bottom: windowtext 1pt solid; border-left: medium none; border-right: windowtext 1pt solid; border-top: medium none; mso-border-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-left-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-top-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; padding: 0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;" valign="top" width="35.62%">
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;" align="justify"><span style="font-family: 'times new roman';"><span style="font-size: 14pt;">Minimum Pension</span></span></div>
</td>
<td style="border-bottom: windowtext 1pt solid; border-left: medium none; border-right: windowtext 1pt solid; border-top: medium none; mso-border-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-left-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-top-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; padding: 0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;" valign="top" width="53.86%">
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;" align="justify"><span style="font-family: 'times new roman';"><span style="font-size: 14pt;">The<br />
Staff-Side says the minimum pension fixed after 7th CPC should be<br />
corrected and revised orders issued. From the brief explanatory note<br />
recorded under this point, it appears that the CPC had sounded out D/o<br />
pension on what the latter thought what the minimum pension should be.</span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;" align="justify"></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;" align="justify"><span style="font-family: 'times new roman';"><span style="font-size: 14pt;">This<br />
is an exclusively pension-related issue on which, as informed by the<br />
Staff-Side, D/o Pension was asked for their views by the 7t1 CPC.<br />
Moreover, as will be evident, the basic focus of DoPT’s Q.M. No.<br />
11/2/2016-JCA dated 16th August, 2016 and 20th February, 2017 is on<br />
taking on board those anomalies which are pay-related. Hence, this item<br />
may be taken up separately by the Staff-Side with the D/o Pension. Thus,<br />
instead of treating this as a case of anomaly, the Staff-Side is<br />
requested to take it up with the D/o Pension separately.</span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;" align="justify"></div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr style="mso-yfti-irow: 5;">
<td style="border-bottom: windowtext 1pt solid; border-left: windowtext 1pt solid; border-right: windowtext 1pt solid; border-top: medium none; mso-border-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-top-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; padding: 0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;" valign="top" width="10.54%">
<div class="MsoListParagraph" style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt 0.5in; mso-add-space: auto; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1; text-indent: -0.25in;" align="justify"><span style="font-family: 'times new roman';"><span style="mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman';"><span style="mso-list: ignore;"><span style="font-size: 14pt;">5.</span><span style="line-height: normal;"><span style="font-size: 7pt;">     </span></span></span></span><span style="font-size: 14pt;"> </span></span></div>
</td>
<td style="border-bottom: windowtext 1pt solid; border-left: medium none; border-right: windowtext 1pt solid; border-top: medium none; mso-border-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-left-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-top-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; padding: 0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;" valign="top" width="35.62%">
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;" align="justify"><span style="font-family: 'times new roman';"><span style="font-size: 14pt;">Date of effect of allowances HRA, Transport Allowance, CEA etc.</span></span></div>
</td>
<td style="border-bottom: windowtext 1pt solid; border-left: medium none; border-right: windowtext 1pt solid; border-top: medium none; mso-border-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-left-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-top-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; padding: 0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;" valign="top" width="53.86%">
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;" align="justify"><span style="font-family: 'times new roman';"><span style="font-size: 14pt;">The<br />
Staff-Side has demanded that the grant of the allowances (revised)<br />
mentioned alongside should be made effective from 01.01.2016 and not<br />
from 01.07.2017.</span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;" align="justify"></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;" align="justify"><span style="font-family: 'times new roman';"><span style="font-size: 14pt;">This<br />
is a demand and cannot be treated as an anomaly. Moreover, the date<br />
from which a benefit is to be made effective is something which can be<br />
decided only by the Government. Hence, this may not be taken up at the<br />
NAC.</span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;" align="justify"></div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr style="mso-yfti-irow: 6; mso-yfti-lastrow: yes;">
<td style="border-bottom: windowtext 1pt solid; border-left: windowtext 1pt solid; border-right: windowtext 1pt solid; border-top: medium none; mso-border-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-top-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; padding: 0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;" valign="top" width="10.54%">
<div class="MsoListParagraph" style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt 0.5in; mso-add-space: auto; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1; text-indent: -0.25in;" align="justify"><span style="font-family: 'times new roman';"><span style="mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman';"><span style="mso-list: ignore;"><span style="font-size: 14pt;">6.</span><span style="line-height: normal;"><span style="font-size: 7pt;">     </span></span></span></span><span style="font-size: 14pt;"> </span></span></div>
</td>
<td style="border-bottom: windowtext 1pt solid; border-left: medium none; border-right: windowtext 1pt solid; border-top: medium none; mso-border-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-left-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-top-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; padding: 0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;" valign="top" width="35.62%">
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;" align="justify"><span style="font-family: 'times new roman';"><span style="font-size: 14pt;">Anomaly in the grant of D.A instalment w.e.f 01.01.2016.</span></span></div>
</td>
<td style="border-bottom: windowtext 1pt solid; border-left: medium none; border-right: windowtext 1pt solid; border-top: medium none; mso-border-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-left-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-top-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; padding: 0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;" valign="top" width="53.86%">
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;" align="justify"><span style="font-family: 'times new roman';"><span style="font-size: 14pt;">Here the Staff-Side has questioned the methodology adopted by the Government in computing the DA instalment w.e.f. 01.01.2016.</span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;" align="justify"></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;" align="justify"><span style="font-family: 'times new roman';"><span style="font-size: 14pt;">It<br />
has, however, to be pointed out that even if there is merit in the<br />
contention of the Staff-Side involving this item, it does not qualify<br />
being called an anomaly when it is examined in the light of the three<br />
situations which, as per DoPT’s Q.M. No. 11/2/2016-JCA dated 16th<br />
August, 2016 and 20th February, 2017, would constitute anomalies.</span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;" align="justify"></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;" align="justify"></div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 12pt; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;" align="justify"></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 12pt; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;" align="justify"><span style="line-height: 15pt;"><span style="font-family: 'times new roman';"><span style="font-size: 14pt;">3. Items to be taken up at the Departmental Anomaly Committees.</span></span></span></div>
<table class="MsoTableGrid" style="border-collapse: collapse; height: 1235px; width: 807px;" border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr style="mso-yfti-firstrow: yes; mso-yfti-irow: 0;">
<td style="border: windowtext 1pt solid; mso-border-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; padding: 0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;" valign="top" width="65">
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;" align="justify"><span style="font-family: 'times new roman';"><span style="font-size: 14pt;">Si. No</span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;" align="justify"></div>
</td>
<td style="border-bottom: windowtext 1pt solid; border-left: medium none; border-right: windowtext 1pt solid; border-top: windowtext 1pt solid; mso-border-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-left-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; padding: 0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;" valign="top" width="222">
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;" align="justify"><span style="font-family: 'times new roman';"><span style="font-size: 14pt;">DescriptionAnomaly</span><span style="mso-tab-count: 1;"><span style="font-size: 14pt;">      </span></span></span></div>
</td>
<td style="border-bottom: windowtext 1pt solid; border-left: medium none; border-right: windowtext 1pt solid; border-top: windowtext 1pt solid; mso-border-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-left-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; padding: 0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;" valign="top" width="335">
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;" align="justify"><span style="font-family: 'times new roman';"><span style="font-size: 14pt;">Comments</span></span></div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr style="mso-yfti-irow: 1;">
<td style="border-bottom: windowtext 1pt solid; border-left: windowtext 1pt solid; border-right: windowtext 1pt solid; border-top: medium none; mso-border-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-top-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; padding: 0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;" valign="top" width="65">
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;" align="justify"><span style="font-family: 'times new roman';"><span style="font-size: 14pt;">1.</span></span></div>
</td>
<td style="border-bottom: windowtext 1pt solid; border-left: medium none; border-right: windowtext 1pt solid; border-top: medium none; mso-border-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-left-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-top-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; padding: 0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;" valign="top" width="222">
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;" align="justify"><span style="font-family: 'times new roman';"><span style="font-size: 14pt;">Implement<span style="mso-tab-count: 1;">  </span>the recommendation on Parity in Pay Scale between Sr. <span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Auditor/Sr. Accountant of IA&amp;AD and organized Accounts with Assistant Section Officer of CSS.</span></span></div>
</td>
<td style="border-bottom: windowtext 1pt solid; border-left: medium none; border-right: windowtext 1pt solid; border-top: medium none; mso-border-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-left-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-top-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; padding: 0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;" valign="top" width="335">
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;" align="justify"><span style="font-family: 'times new roman';"><span style="font-size: 14pt;">The<br />
Staff-Side says that although the 5th, 6th and now 7th CPC’s have<br />
recommended that the pay-scales of different cadres/categories/grades<br />
requiring the same recruitment qualifications should be the same, denial<br />
of the same benefit to the Statistical Assistants (SA’s) who are<br />
otherwise at par with Assistant Section Officers (erstwhile ‘Assistant’)<br />
is a violation of the principle. While ASO’s are placed in the<br />
Pay-Matrix of 7, SA’s are in the Pay-Matrix of 6. This arrangement is<br />
stated to have disturbed the horizontal relativity between the<br />
pay-scales of the SA’s in the Organized Accounts and IA&amp;AD Cadre and<br />
ASO’s in the CSS cadre. In conclusion, it has been requested that SA’s<br />
should also be placed in Pay-Matrix no. 7.</span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;" align="justify"><span style="font-family: 'times new roman';"><span style="font-size: 14pt;">Even<br />
if, the present case comes across as one of anomaly, it appears that<br />
the interests of the Statistical Assistants only are involved. ASO’s of<br />
CCS are coming into the question; but only as a reference point, by way<br />
of comparison. Hence the Staff-Side is requested to take up this issue<br />
at the Departmental Anomaly Committee concerned.</span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;" align="justify"></div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr style="mso-yfti-irow: 2;">
<td style="border-bottom: windowtext 1pt solid; border-left: windowtext 1pt solid; border-right: windowtext 1pt solid; border-top: medium none; mso-border-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-top-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; padding: 0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;" valign="top" width="65">
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;" align="justify"><span style="font-family: 'times new roman';"><span style="font-size: 14pt;">2.</span></span></div>
</td>
<td style="border-bottom: windowtext 1pt solid; border-left: medium none; border-right: windowtext 1pt solid; border-top: medium none; mso-border-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-left-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-top-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; padding: 0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;" valign="top" width="222">
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;" align="justify"><span style="font-family: 'times new roman';"><span style="font-size: 14pt;">Technical Supervisors<span style="mso-tab-count: 1;">     </span>of Railways</span></span></div>
</td>
<td style="border-bottom: windowtext 1pt solid; border-left: medium none; border-right: windowtext 1pt solid; border-top: medium none; mso-border-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-left-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-top-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; padding: 0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;" valign="top" width="335">
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;" align="justify"><span style="font-family: 'times new roman';"><span style="font-size: 14pt;">This<br />
particular item is exclusively Railways-specific. The Staff-Side, NC<br />
OCM) is requested to take it up at the Departmental Anomaly Committee of<br />
MR) Railways.</span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;" align="justify"></div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr style="mso-yfti-irow: 3; mso-yfti-lastrow: yes;">
<td style="border-bottom: windowtext 1pt solid; border-left: windowtext 1pt solid; border-right: windowtext 1pt solid; border-top: medium none; mso-border-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-top-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; padding: 0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;" valign="top" width="65">
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;" align="justify"><span style="font-family: 'times new roman';"><span style="font-size: 14pt;">3.</span></span></div>
</td>
<td style="border-bottom: windowtext 1pt solid; border-left: medium none; border-right: windowtext 1pt solid; border-top: medium none; mso-border-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-left-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-top-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; padding: 0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;" valign="top" width="222">
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;" align="justify"><span style="font-family: 'times new roman';"><span style="font-size: 14pt;">Anomaly<span style="mso-tab-count: 1;">     </span>in<span style="mso-tab-count: 1;">       </span>the assignment<span style="mso-tab-count: 1;">  </span>of replacement of Levels of pay in the Ministry of Defence, Railways, Mines etc in the case of Store Keepers<span style="mso-tab-count: 1;">     </span>.</span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;" align="justify"></div>
</td>
<td style="border-bottom: windowtext 1pt solid; border-left: medium none; border-right: windowtext 1pt solid; border-top: medium none; mso-border-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-left-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-top-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; padding: 0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;" valign="top" width="335">
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;" align="justify"><span style="font-family: 'times new roman';"><span style="font-size: 14pt;">Staff-Side<br />
says that although ‘Store keeper’ is one such category of posts which<br />
is common to various Departments like Defence, Mines, Railways etc and<br />
in spite of the nature of job, responsibilities being similar, the<br />
pay-scale of storekeepers across all the Departments is not the same. It<br />
is still less in the M/o Defence even after the entry-level<br />
qualifications which were different before the 7th CPC stage, have been<br />
revised.</span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;" align="justify"><span style="font-family: 'times new roman';"><span style="font-size: 14pt;">If<br />
what the Staff-Side remonstrates that even after the requisite changes<br />
had been carried out in the R/Rules, the 7th CPC did not take any<br />
cognizance of it is true, it has to be assumed that it is a policy<br />
decision of the Government. Moreover, the issue appears to be M/o<br />
Defence-specific. The Staff-Side is requested to take it up at the<br />
Departmental Anomaly Committee meeting of the M/o Defence.</span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;" align="justify"></div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 12pt; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;" align="justify"></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 12pt; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;" align="justify"><span style="line-height: 15pt;"><span style="mso-tab-count: 1;"><span style="font-family: 'times new roman';"><span style="font-size: 14pt;">          </span></span></span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 12pt; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;" align="justify"><span style="line-height: 15pt;"><span style="font-family: 'times new roman';"><span style="font-size: 14pt;">4.<span style="mso-tab-count: 1;">       </span>Item to be taken up separately with the Department of Pension.</span></span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 12pt; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;" align="justify"></div>
<table class="MsoTableGrid" style="border-collapse: collapse; height: 402px; width: 804px;" border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr style="mso-yfti-firstrow: yes; mso-yfti-irow: 0;">
<td style="border: windowtext 1pt solid; mso-border-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; padding: 0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;" valign="top" width="65">
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;" align="justify"><span style="font-family: 'times new roman';"><span style="font-size: 14pt;">Si. No</span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;" align="justify"></div>
</td>
<td style="border-bottom: windowtext 1pt solid; border-left: medium none; border-right: windowtext 1pt solid; border-top: windowtext 1pt solid; mso-border-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-left-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; padding: 0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;" valign="top" width="222">
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;" align="justify"><span style="font-family: 'times new roman';"><span style="font-size: 14pt;">DescriptionAnomaly</span><span style="mso-tab-count: 1;"><span style="font-size: 14pt;">      </span></span></span></div>
</td>
<td style="border-bottom: windowtext 1pt solid; border-left: medium none; border-right: windowtext 1pt solid; border-top: windowtext 1pt solid; mso-border-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-left-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; padding: 0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;" valign="top" width="335">
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;" align="justify"><span style="font-family: 'times new roman';"><span style="font-size: 14pt;">Comments</span></span></div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr style="mso-yfti-irow: 1; mso-yfti-lastrow: yes;">
<td style="border-bottom: windowtext 1pt solid; border-left: windowtext 1pt solid; border-right: windowtext 1pt solid; border-top: medium none; mso-border-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-top-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; padding: 0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;" valign="top" width="65">
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;" align="justify"><span style="font-family: 'times new roman';"><span style="font-size: 14pt;">1.</span></span></div>
</td>
<td style="border-bottom: windowtext 1pt solid; border-left: medium none; border-right: windowtext 1pt solid; border-top: medium none; mso-border-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-left-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-top-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; padding: 0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;" valign="top" width="222">
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;" align="justify"><span style="font-family: 'times new roman';"><span style="font-size: 14pt;">Anomaly<span style="mso-tab-count: 1;">     </span>arising from the decision to reject option-1 in pension fixation</span></span></div>
</td>
<td style="border-bottom: windowtext 1pt solid; border-left: medium none; border-right: windowtext 1pt solid; border-top: medium none; mso-border-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-left-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-top-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; padding: 0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;" valign="top" width="335">
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;" align="justify"><span style="font-family: 'times new roman';"><span style="font-size: 14pt;">As<br />
per the ToR of the NAC, anomalies are basically pay-centric. Under this<br />
point, the contention of the Staff-Side is pension-centric.<br />
Furthermore, the Staff-Side has themselves clarified that post-7th CPC,<br />
Government had set up a CoS headed by Secretary(Pension) to look into<br />
the first option recommended by the 7th CPC. Eventually, this was not<br />
found feasible to be implemented. With such a decision having been taken<br />
at the CoS level, it cannot be called an anomaly. In view of this, we<br />
may inform the Staff-Side to separately take it up with D/0 Pension<br />
without treating it as an anomaly that can be taken up at the NAC.</span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;" align="justify"></div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 12pt; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;" align="justify"></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 12pt; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;" align="justify"><span style="line-height: 15pt;"><span style="mso-tab-count: 3;"><span style="font-family: 'times new roman';"><span style="font-size: 14pt;">                             </span></span></span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 12pt; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;" align="justify"><span style="line-height: 15pt;"><span style="font-family: 'times new roman';"><span style="font-size: 14pt;">5.<span style="mso-tab-count: 1;">       </span>More details required to examine the following item.</span></span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 12pt; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;" align="justify"></div>
<table class="MsoTableGrid" style="border-collapse: collapse; height: 335px; width: 800px;" border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr style="mso-yfti-firstrow: yes; mso-yfti-irow: 0;">
<td style="border: windowtext 1pt solid; mso-border-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; padding: 0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;" valign="top" width="65">
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;" align="justify"><span style="font-family: 'times new roman';"><span style="font-size: 14pt;">Si. No</span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;" align="justify"></div>
</td>
<td style="border-bottom: windowtext 1pt solid; border-left: medium none; border-right: windowtext 1pt solid; border-top: windowtext 1pt solid; mso-border-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-left-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; padding: 0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;" valign="top" width="222">
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;" align="justify"><span style="font-family: 'times new roman';"><span style="font-size: 14pt;">DescriptionAnomaly</span><span style="mso-tab-count: 1;"><span style="font-size: 14pt;">      </span></span></span></div>
</td>
<td style="border-bottom: windowtext 1pt solid; border-left: medium none; border-right: windowtext 1pt solid; border-top: windowtext 1pt solid; mso-border-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-left-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; padding: 0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;" valign="top" width="335">
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;" align="justify"><span style="font-family: 'times new roman';"><span style="font-size: 14pt;">Comments</span></span></div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr style="mso-yfti-irow: 1; mso-yfti-lastrow: yes;">
<td style="border-bottom: windowtext 1pt solid; border-left: windowtext 1pt solid; border-right: windowtext 1pt solid; border-top: medium none; mso-border-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-top-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; padding: 0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;" valign="top" width="65">
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;" align="justify"><span style="font-family: 'times new roman';"><span style="font-size: 14pt;">1.</span></span></div>
</td>
<td style="border-bottom: windowtext 1pt solid; border-left: medium none; border-right: windowtext 1pt solid; border-top: medium none; mso-border-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-left-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-top-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; padding: 0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;" valign="top" width="222">
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;" align="justify"><span style="font-family: 'times new roman';"><span style="font-size: 14pt;">Parity in Pay Scales between<span style="mso-tab-count: 1;">      </span>Assistants<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">  </span>/Stenographers<span style="mso-tab-count: 1;">      </span>in field / subordinate officers and assistant Section Officer and stenographers in CSS.</span></span></div>
</td>
<td style="border-bottom: windowtext 1pt solid; border-left: medium none; border-right: windowtext 1pt solid; border-top: medium none; mso-border-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-left-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-top-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; padding: 0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;" valign="top" width="335">
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;" align="justify"><span style="font-family: 'times new roman';"><span style="font-size: 14pt;">Although the<span style="mso-tab-count: 1;">         </span>heading of this item is<span style="mso-tab-count: 1;">          </span>self-explanatory, the relevant text given in the paper sent<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">  </span>is<br />
not complete as the pay-scales of Assistants and stenos posted in field<br />
have not been mentioned therein. Until their pay-scales are known</span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;" align="justify"><span style="font-family: 'times new roman';"><span style="font-size: 14pt;">they<br />
cannot be compared to check whether there is indeed any anomaly. The<br />
Staff-Side is requested to provide more information that is relevant so<br />
that it can be properly examined to find out whether an anomaly arises<br />
here or not.</span></span></div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<div style="text-align: right;"> Yours faithfully,</div>
<div style="text-align: right;"></div>
<div style="text-align: right;"> S/d,</div>
<div style="text-align: right;">(D.K. Sengupta)</div>
<div style="text-align: right;"></div>
<div style="text-align: right;">Deputy Secretary to the Government of India</div>
<p><a href="https://www.govtempdiary.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/DOPT-Letter-NC-JCM-1.pdf" target="_blank">Signed Copy</a></p>
</div>
<p>The post <a href="https://centralgovernmentnews.com/19735/">DOPT : Items proposed by the Staff-Side, NC(JCM) for discussion in the National Anomaly Committee</a> appeared first on <a href="https://centralgovernmentnews.com">CENTRAL GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES NEWS</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://centralgovernmentnews.com/19735/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>NC/JCM has demanded to convene a meeting of the National Council (JCM)</title>
		<link>https://centralgovernmentnews.com/ncjcm-demanded-convene-meeting-national-council-jcm/</link>
					<comments>https://centralgovernmentnews.com/ncjcm-demanded-convene-meeting-national-council-jcm/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2014 10:15:23 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[7CPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employees News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[7th CPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Central Government Employees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grameen Dak Sewaks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JCM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Merger of DA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Council JCM Staff Side]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NC/JCM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ncjcmstaffside]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://centralgovernmentnews.com/?p=8251</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>NC/JCM has demanded to convene a meeting of the National Council (JCM) National Council (Staff Side) Joint Consultative Machinery For Central Government Employees 13-c, Ferozshah Road, New Delhi – 110 001 Shiva Gopal Mishra Secretary No.NC/JCM/2014 Dated: December 16, 2014 The Cabinet Secretary, (Government of India), Cabinet Secretariat, Rashtrapati Bhawan, New Delhi Dear Sir, Sub: [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://centralgovernmentnews.com/ncjcm-demanded-convene-meeting-national-council-jcm/">NC/JCM has demanded to convene a meeting of the National Council (JCM)</a> appeared first on <a href="https://centralgovernmentnews.com">CENTRAL GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES NEWS</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>NC/JCM has demanded to convene a meeting of the National Council (JCM)</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: center;">National Council (Staff Side)<br />
Joint Consultative Machinery<br />
For Central Government Employees<br />
13-c, Ferozshah Road, New Delhi – 110 001</p>
<p>Shiva Gopal Mishra<br />
Secretary</p>
<p>No.NC/JCM/2014</p>
<p style="text-align: right;">Dated: December 16, 2014</p>
<p>The Cabinet Secretary,<br />
(Government of India),<br />
Cabinet Secretariat,<br />
Rashtrapati Bhawan,<br />
New Delhi</p>
<p>Dear Sir,</p>
<p>Sub: <strong>Functioning of Joint Consultative Machinery</strong></p>
<p>Since assuming charge of Secretary(Staff Side), National Council(JCM), I have repeatedly demanded to convene a meeting of the National Council(JCM). It is, however, regretful to point out that, despite all out efforts made by me and requesting you in person to hold the meeting, no meeting of the NC/JCM has been convened till date.</p>
<p>It may be appreciated the Joint Consultative Machinery(JCM) at the National level, conceived as an effective Negotiating Forum, has virtually become defunct as no meeting of this forum has been held during the last four years, with the result that, a number of major grievances of the Central Government employees continue to remain unresolved, because of which they are badly agitated.</p>
<p>The procrastinated discussions in the National Anomaly Committee did not proceed to settle any tangible anomaly item. Even after reaching agreement, the government has refused to issue orders on some issues. This apart, the demands raised by the Staff Side for grant of Interim Relief and Merger of DA with Pay have been refused by the government. One of the vital segments of the Central Government Employees, i.e. Grameen Dak Sewaks of the Postal Department, are kept outside the ambit of the 7th CPC. Unilateral decisions were taken to induct FDI in the Railways, Privatize the Railway and Defence Production Units; closure of the Printing Presses, Publication and Stationery Departments; contractorise the medical store functions; corporatize the Postal Organization and outsource various governmental functions.</p>
<p>Under these circumstances, all the constituents of the National Council(JCM)(Staff Side) had to hold a “National Convention” on 11th December, 2014 in New Delhi, wherein after detailed deliberations and taking stock of the situation, a detailed programme of struggle has been chalked-out. In case there is no positive response from the Official Side, it will ultimately lead to indefinite strike.</p>
<p>A copy of the Declaration of the above-mentioned Convention is enclosed herewith, which is self-explanatory.</p>
<p>We do fervently hope that negotiation is possible even at this late stage and would therefore urge upon you to take concrete steps in that direction. We also hope that you will be able to appreciate that any decision of the government which affects the job security of the employees adversely need to be discussed and agreement reached at the JCM Forum.</p>
<p>I would, therefore, request you to personally intervene in the matter, being the Chairman of the National Council(JCM), so as to avoid serious unrest and disturbance to industrial peace in the Central Government Services and hold discussions with the Staff Side, NC/JCM on these vital issues at your earliest.</p>
<p style="text-align: right;">Sd/-<br />
(Shiva Gopal Mishra)</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://ncjcmstaffside.com/2014/com-shiva-gopal-mishra-secretary-ncjcm-demanded-convene-meeting-national-council-jcm/" target="_blank">ncjcm</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://centralgovernmentnews.com/ncjcm-demanded-convene-meeting-national-council-jcm/">NC/JCM has demanded to convene a meeting of the National Council (JCM)</a> appeared first on <a href="https://centralgovernmentnews.com">CENTRAL GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES NEWS</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://centralgovernmentnews.com/ncjcm-demanded-convene-meeting-national-council-jcm/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
