<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Ministerial Staff Archives - CENTRAL GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES NEWS</title>
	<atom:link href="https://centralgovernmentnews.com/tag/ministerial-staff/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://centralgovernmentnews.com/tag/ministerial-staff/</link>
	<description>All about Central Government Employees News. Get the central govt employees latest news, DoPT Orders, 7th Pay Commission, DA Hike, latest notification for pensioners, MACP latest order, da for central government employees, and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2016 02:22:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Points to be taken into consideration while finalizing the 7th Pay Commission Report: Demands by MSA, SoI</title>
		<link>https://centralgovernmentnews.com/points-to-be-taken-into-consideration-while-finalizing-the-7th-pay-commission-report-demands-by-msa-soi/</link>
					<comments>https://centralgovernmentnews.com/points-to-be-taken-into-consideration-while-finalizing-the-7th-pay-commission-report-demands-by-msa-soi/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2016 02:45:40 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[7CPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[7th Central Pay Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[7th CPC Recommendation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cadre Restructuring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CGHS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grade pay of SO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LDC-UDC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ministerial Staff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seventh Pay Commission]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://centralgovernmentnews.com/?p=12379</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Points to be taken into consideration while finalizing the 7th Pay Commission Report: Demands by MSA, SoI SURVEY OF INDIA MINISTERIAL STAFF ASSOCIATION (CHQs’) Dehradun Points to be taken into consideration while finalizing the 7th Pay Commission Report :- The demand of the Staff Side to fix the minimum pay to that of Rs. 26,000/- [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://centralgovernmentnews.com/points-to-be-taken-into-consideration-while-finalizing-the-7th-pay-commission-report-demands-by-msa-soi/">Points to be taken into consideration while finalizing the 7th Pay Commission Report: Demands by MSA, SoI</a> appeared first on <a href="https://centralgovernmentnews.com">CENTRAL GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES NEWS</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Points to be taken into consideration while finalizing the 7th Pay Commission Report: Demands by MSA, SoI</p>
<div></div>
<div data-blogger-escaped-style="text-align: center;">
<p>SURVEY OF INDIA</p>
</div>
<div data-blogger-escaped-style="text-align: center;">
<p>MINISTERIAL STAFF ASSOCIATION (CHQs’)</p>
</div>
<div data-blogger-escaped-style="text-align: center;">
<p>Dehradun</p>
</div>
<blockquote class="tr_bq"><p><b>Points to be taken into consideration while finalizing the 7th Pay Commission Report :-</b></p></blockquote>
<div data-blogger-escaped-style="text-align: justify;">
<p>The demand of the Staff Side to fix the minimum pay to that of Rs. 26,000/- has been completely rejected by the 7th CPC and has arbitrarily fixed the minimum pay as Rs. 18000/, The 7th CPC has mutilated the formula for fixing the minimum wage. The minimum wage recommended amounts to a meager increase of Rs. 2250 from the existing minimum pay of Rs. 7000 + 8750 (125 % DA as on 1.1.2016). From this minimum pay of Rs, 18000/-, as per the recommendation of the 7th CPC itself Rs. 1500/- will be recovered for CGEIGS and 10 % i. e Rs.1800/- will be recovered towards New Pension Scheme from the employees recruited after 1.1.2004 and 6% towards GPF contribution from the employees recruited prior to 1.1.2004 resulting in minus or a very meager  benefit for the low paid employees.</p>
</div>
<div data-blogger-escaped-style="text-align: justify;"></div>
<div data-blogger-escaped-style="text-align: justify;">
<p>While the minimum wage is fixed as Rs. 18000/- the Secretary level officers are given a huge hike of Rs. 2,25,000 and the Cabinet Secretary’s salary is fixed as Rs. 2,50,000. The ratio between minimum pay and the maximum pay should be not more than 1: 8, the 7th CPC has kept the ratio as 1: 13.88.   The public at large is misled by the statement that a hike of Rs 23.5% is granted to Central Government employees where as the actual increase is only  3 to 4 % as per the calculation given below</p>
</div>
<h3 data-blogger-escaped-style="text-align: left;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Calculation of Pay and allowance for the month  of January 2016 as per  Sixth CPC is given below:</span>&#8211;</h3>
<p>Basic Pay Pay = PB Rs.5200 + GP Rs.1800 = Rs.7000/-</p>
<p>Assuming DA 125% as on 1.1.2016 = Rs. 8750/-</p>
<p>(Since he is staying in Quarter) HRA = Nil</p>
<p>T.A. = 600 + DA = Rs. 1350/-</p>
<p><b>Total Gross Amount =Rs. 17100/-</b></p>
<p><b><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Deductions:</span></b></p>
<p>NPS 10% of basic Pay + DA =  Rs. 1575/-</p>
<p>CGEGIS = Rs.    30/-</p>
<p><b>Total Deductions = Rs.  1605/-</b></p>
<p><b>Net Pay (6th CPC) =Rs. 15495/-</b></p>
<h3 data-blogger-escaped-style="text-align: left;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Calculation of Pay and allowance for the month  of January 2016 as per  Seventh CPC is given below:-</span></h3>
<p>Basic Pay Pay = Rs.18000/-</p>
<p>7th Pay Commission DA as  on 1.1.2016 = Nil</p>
<p>(Since he is staying in Quarter) HRA = Nil</p>
<p>T.A. = 600 + DA = Rs. 1350/-</p>
<p><b>Total Gross Amount =Rs. 19350/-</b></p>
<p><b><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Deductions:</span></b></p>
<p>NPS 10% of basic Pay =  Rs. 1800/-</p>
<p>CGEGIS (as per 7th CPC recommendation) = Rs.   1500/-</p>
<p><b>Total Deductions = Rs.  3300/-</b></p>
<p><b><br />
</b> <b>Net Pay (7th CPC) =Rs. 16050/-</b></p>
<p><b>The Benefit out of 7th Pay commission is (16050 – 15495) only Rs. 555/- which is 3.2 % of the gross pay of 6th CPC.</b></p>
<p>The minimum wages should be fixed at Rs. 23,100/- as per the calculation given below</p>
<p>Basic Pay Pay = PB Rs.5200 + GP Rs.1800 = Rs.7000/-   (Basic Pay)</p>
<p>100% D.A. which should be merged as per Vth CPC = Rs. 7000/-  (Dearness Pay)</p>
<p>25% DA on the above (total DA 125% &#8211; 100%) =Rs.  3500/-  (D.A.)</p>
<p>40% benefit (as given in VIth CPC) on Pay +DP =Rs. 5600/- (Fixation benefit)(*)</p>
<p>(*)(VIth CPC has given fixation benefit of  40% of the maximum of pre-revised scale)</p>
<p><b><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Total Gross Amount =Rs. 23100/-</span></b></p>
<blockquote class="tr_bq"><p><b><span style="text-decoration: underline;"> Hence the minimum benefit should be not less than 23,100/-</span></b></p></blockquote>
<div data-blogger-escaped-style="text-align: justify;"></div>
<h3 data-blogger-escaped-style="text-align: justify;"><b>House Rent Allowance</b></h3>
<div data-blogger-escaped-style="text-align: justify;">
<p>The House Rent Allowance has been reduced from the existing 30% to 24%, 20% to 16% and 10% to 8%. More over the 7th CPC has recommended for abolition of various allowances like small family allowance, Cash Handling Allowance and advances like festival advance, Scooter Advance etc. Instead of removing the existing anomalies in the MACP Scheme, the 7th CPC has introduced examination for granting MACP. The 7th CPC has refused to make any recommendations against the New Pension Scheme. For the 2114 spell of 365 days child care leave for women employees the leave wages will be reduced to 80%.</p>
</div>
<div data-blogger-escaped-style="text-align: justify;"></div>
<div data-blogger-escaped-style="text-align: justify;"></div>
<div data-blogger-escaped-style="text-align: justify;">
<p><b> We demand the Allowances like Family Planning Allowance, Cash Handling Allowance, Care Taker Allowance should not be abolished.   The Advances like Scooter Advance, Festival Advance, Flood Advance should not be abolished as these are  the meager amount the low paid employees are getting to celebrate festival and other genuine purposes.  CCL should be granted for 2 years without reducing it to 80% in the 2nd year.</b></p>
</div>
<div data-blogger-escaped-style="text-align: justify;"></div>
<div data-blogger-escaped-style="text-align: justify;">
<p>Benefit on promotion before the 7th pay commission is more than the amount of promotion to be given after  implementation of the 7th Central Pay Commission :-</p>
</div>
<div data-blogger-escaped-style="text-align: justify;"></div>
<div data-blogger-escaped-style="text-align: justify;">
<p>Suppose an UDC get promotion to Assistant before 1.1.2016.</p>
</div>
<div data-blogger-escaped-style="text-align: justify;">
<p>His present Pay :11100 + 2400 Grade Pay</p>
</div>
<div data-blogger-escaped-style="text-align: justify;">
<p>D.A. @ 125 %:16875</p>
</div>
<div data-blogger-escaped-style="text-align: justify;">
<p>On promotion his pay will be : 11510 + 4200</p>
</div>
<div data-blogger-escaped-style="text-align: justify;">
<p>New Pay as per  7th CPC=15710 X 2.57= 40374   Pay metrix : 41100/-</p>
</div>
<div data-blogger-escaped-style="text-align: justify;"></div>
<div data-blogger-escaped-style="text-align: justify;">
<p><b> He will get the pay or Rs. 41,100/- in the revised scale  if he  get his promotion before 1.1.2016.</b></p>
</div>
<div data-blogger-escaped-style="text-align: justify;"></div>
<div data-blogger-escaped-style="text-align: justify;">
<p><b> If the same person is getting promotion after 7th C.P.C.</b></p>
</div>
<div data-blogger-escaped-style="text-align: justify;"></div>
<div data-blogger-escaped-style="text-align: justify;">
<p>Pay as on 1.1.2016  is    (11100+2400) X 2.57   =  34695   Pay metrix :  35,300/-</p>
</div>
<div data-blogger-escaped-style="text-align: justify;"></div>
<div data-blogger-escaped-style="text-align: justify;">
<p>On promotion one increment in the same Level should be given   Rs. 36400/- .  As there is no pay near to that  his pay will be upgraded to 36,500/- minimum of the Pay matrix No. 6</p>
</div>
<div data-blogger-escaped-style="text-align: justify;"></div>
<div data-blogger-escaped-style="text-align: justify;">
<p><b> His pay will be only Rs. 36,500/- if he get a promotion after 7th Pay Commission.</b></p>
</div>
<div data-blogger-escaped-style="text-align: justify;"></div>
<div data-blogger-escaped-style="text-align: justify;">
<p><b>Hence the loss is    (41100-36500)   =   4600/- </b></p>
</div>
<div data-blogger-escaped-style="text-align: justify;"></div>
<div data-blogger-escaped-style="text-align: justify;">
<p><b> It is one of the example in many cases the loss will be more than this.</b></p>
</div>
<div data-blogger-escaped-style="text-align: justify;"></div>
<div data-blogger-escaped-style="text-align: justify;">
<p>Hence it is suggested that the rate of increment should be minimum 5% and on promotion 2 increment should be given otherwise there will be lot of difference in the pay of  employees who got promotion one day before the implementation of 7th Pay commission and those who got promotion after implementation of the 7th pay commission.</p>
</div>
<div data-blogger-escaped-style="text-align: justify;"></div>
<h3 data-blogger-escaped-style="text-align: justify;"><b>Rate of Increment shown in the Pay Matrix  is less than  3%</b></h3>
<div data-blogger-escaped-style="text-align: justify;">
<p>Please see the Pay Matrix given on page No. 89.</p>
</div>
<div data-blogger-escaped-style="text-align: justify;"></div>
<div data-blogger-escaped-style="text-align: justify;">
<p>          Level 2,   Index 2,   the pay is shown as 20500,  after giving an increment of 3%  it should be 21,115/-  but the next index is only Rs. 21,100/- (level 2 index 3)    next pay also should be 21115 + 633 =21748 but the next index (level 2 index 4) is only 21700/-   in Level 6 index 14 also it should be 50500 + 1515 = 52015/- whereas it is given only 52000/-.  In many places even though the increment is shown as 3%,  it is rounded off to lesser amount causing  the employees at financial  loss.  In VIth pay, while calculating increment,  commission if the last digit  is 1 or above it used to  round  off to next 10.  So here also if the amount is 10 or above it should be rounded off to the next 100.  Kindly look into the matter.</p>
</div>
<div data-blogger-escaped-style="text-align: justify;"></div>
<h3 data-blogger-escaped-style="text-align: justify;">Cadre Restructuring</h3>
<div data-blogger-escaped-style="text-align: justify;">
<p>As per 7th CPC para No. 1.26 (page No. 6), there is a  mention about Cadre Review.</p>
</div>
<div data-blogger-escaped-style="text-align: justify;"></div>
<div data-blogger-escaped-style="text-align: justify;">
<p>&#8221; A serious grievance has been made by all services that Cadre Reviews have not taken place for years together, which has resulted in great anguish and frustration among the services.  Though it is essentially an administrative matter, it has a serious impact on the status and emoluments of employees.  On account of delay in Cadre Reviews, many Central Services lag behind and that gives rise to frustration and ultimately effects governance.  We have tried to cover this issue in the appropriate chapter in this report.  Therefore, the government should take a call and give them a proper representation in the government.</p>
</div>
<div data-blogger-escaped-style="text-align: justify;"></div>
<div data-blogger-escaped-style="text-align: justify;">
<p>        <b> 6.2.10   (pare No. 106) </b>  The services have contended that there is an urgent requirement for the Defence Forces to undertake periodic cadre reviews to remain current in their manpower structuring, and to enable the forces to adapt to the changing operational scenario at all times, without affecting the pyramidal structure in the services.  <b>The commission recognizes the importance of Cadre Reviews in aligning a service to the ever changing organizational needs and to maintain congruence between functional needs and legitimate aspirations of its officers.</b></p>
</div>
<div data-blogger-escaped-style="text-align: justify;"></div>
<div data-blogger-escaped-style="text-align: justify;">
<p><b> 7.3.12 (page No. 170) </b>The various service Associations highlighted that in very many cadres refiews have not been carried out for long.  <b>Extant instructions are that a cadre review should be undertaken at least once in a period of five years. </b> The fact that these instructions have not been followed in many cases has bred resentment and frustration.</p>
</div>
<div data-blogger-escaped-style="text-align: justify;"></div>
<div data-blogger-escaped-style="text-align: justify;"></div>
<div data-blogger-escaped-style="text-align: justify;">
<p>7.3.13.  The process of cadre restructuring and the reported delays affecting the genuine career aspirations of employees at all levels, was discussed with the Department of Personnel and Training (DoPT).  The department acknowledged that while the ideal periodicity is five years, in various cases, reviews are delayed due to many reasons. <b> Significant amongst these is non submission of proposals by the cadre controlling authorities. </b> As far as DOPTs concerned, the procedure as well as the templates (for proposal submission) is stated to have been well formulated and disseminated.  It was also informed that meetings of the Cadre Review Committee (CRC) are held regularly.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
</div>
<div data-blogger-escaped-style="text-align: justify;">
<p>The maiden cadre review proposal in respect of Ministerial Staff, started in the year 2003 reached nowhere.  Whereas  cadre review of Group A Officers has been processed and implemented during the corresponding period. Thus cadre review procedure for group B &amp; C staff should be implemented at the before the implementation of VIIth Pay Commission, so that our staff will be benefited.  It is therefore, urged upon the respective authority that Cadre Restructuring of Ministerial Staff in particular and Group ‘B’ &amp; ‘C’ Staff in General should be considered before implementation of 7th CPC. Otherwise the same grievances and difficulties regarding continuation of operational scenario of Ministerial job will be existed after this CPC implementation.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
</div>
<div data-blogger-escaped-style="text-align: justify;"></div>
<div data-blogger-escaped-style="text-align: justify;">
<p>The following points may kindly be taken into consideration while finalizing the VIIth Pay Commission proposal:</p>
</div>
<table border="1" width="100%" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top">Sl. No.</td>
<td valign="top">
<div align="center">
<p>Name of the Post</p>
</div>
</td>
<td valign="top">
<div align="center">
<p>Remarks</p>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">01</td>
<td valign="top">Estt. &amp; Accounts</p>
<p>Officer</td>
<td valign="top">The Pay Scale of E &amp; AO as per</p>
<table border="1" width="100%" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="80">4th CPC</td>
<td valign="top" width="83">5th CPC</td>
<td valign="top" width="91">6th CPC</td>
<td valign="top" width="169">Now recommended</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="80">2375-75-</p>
<p>3200-100-3500</td>
<td valign="top" width="83">7450-225-</p>
<p>11500</td>
<td valign="top" width="91">9300-34800</p>
<p>GP 4600</td>
<td valign="top" width="169">9300-34800</p>
<p>GP 4800</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>The Pay Scale of Group &#8216;B&#8217; Gazetted Post (Technical)</p>
<table border="1" width="100%" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="86">4th CPC</td>
<td valign="top" width="76">5th CPC</td>
<td valign="top" width="96">6th CPC</td>
<td valign="top" width="165">Now recommended</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="86">2000-60-</p>
<p>2300-75-</p>
<p>3200</td>
<td valign="top" width="76">6500-200-</p>
<p>10500</td>
<td valign="top" width="96">9300-34800</p>
<p>GP 4200</p>
<p>Later on GP</p>
<p>Increased to</p>
<p>4600/-</td>
<td valign="top" width="165">9300-34800</p>
<p>GP 4800</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>There is a huge difference in the pay scales of E&amp; AO as a specialized Gr ‘B’ Officer and other Group B Officers of Survey of India in 4th and 5th CPC.</p>
<p>The Duties of E &amp; AO is much more than that of Group &#8220;B&#8221; Gazetted Officers (Technical) of Survey of India.</p>
<p>The duties of E &amp; AO are:-</p>
<p>To function as DDO. To supervise both Establish &amp; Accounts Section of the GDC. To Assist the Director in functioning as Administrative Head and Controlling Officer of the GDC/Directorate, etc. The Grade Pay of Section is Rs. 4800/- as per 6th Pay Commission. There are many Section Officers (Office Suptds.) are working under E &amp; AO.</p>
<p>Hence the grade pay recommended by 6<sup>th</sup> CPC for E &amp; AO is not correct. The Grade Pay of E &amp; AO should be 5400/- considering the duties and responsibilities allotted to him/her.</p>
<p>As per VIIth Pay Commission report Para No. 7.1.4 (Page No. 140), the Grade Pay of Section Officer is a promotion post for Assistant (GP 4600). Initially on promotion, the SO is at GP 4800 and after four years is entitled to a non-functional upgrade to GP 5400 (PB-3), effectively two level higher.</p>
<p><b> As per VIIth pay commission report Para No. 11.27.19 (ii) page No. 684, the Superintendent of Income Tax are getting the Grade pay of Rs. 4600/-. There are many Office Superintendents working under an E &amp; A.O. Hence it is suggested to consider to upgrade the Grade of Rs. 5400/- to E&amp; AO. </b></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">02.</td>
<td valign="top">Office Superintendent</td>
<td valign="top">The duties of Office Superintendent in Survey of India is one and the same of Section Officers in other Departments. It includes supervising and checking the works of the Ministerial Section and to allot the work to the ministerial staff. Supervision of preparation of reports/returns, seniority lists/gradation list, budget estimates, audit reports, pension cases, work of cashier, internal auditing. Compilation/consolidation/monitoring and disbursement of Budget, Reconciliation, correspondence on audit paras, Data Entry and Respective Correspondence, work related to recruitment. To check the reply of legal cases/RTI caes and to ensure their timely submission. Training and guiding the junior ministerial staff, etc.</p>
<p>The Section Officers of other Departments are getting the Grade pay of Rs. 4800/-. Please refer the letter of 7th CPC regarding recruitment of staff, wherein the pay of Section Officers/equivalent is mentioned as Rs. 4800/-.</p>
<p><b> The name of Office Superintendent should be changed as Senior Section Officer in the proposed Restructuring proposal and the G.P should be determined accordingly. </b></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">03.</td>
<td valign="top">Assistants</td>
<td valign="top">As per the recommendation of 6th CPC the pay scale of Assistants was upgraded in the pre-revised scale of Rs. 6500-10500 as par with the Central Secretariat Assistants (Grade pay 4200 in the revised scale). In the meantime the grade pay of Central Secretariat Assistants has been raised from Rs. 4200/- to Rs. 4600/- but the same was not done in the case of Assistants of Survey of India. The Assistants were designated as Head Clerk before the creation of the GDCs and they were working as Section Officers in Units/field Parties.</p>
<p>Please refer the letter of 7th CPC regarding recruitment of staff, wherein the pay of Assistants are mentioned as Rs. 4600/- (copy enclosed).</p>
<p>As per VIIth Pay Commission Report page No. 145, the commission has strongly recommended parity in pay between the field staff and headquarter staff upto the rank of Assistants.</p>
<p>&#8221; <b> <i> The Commission accordingly strongly recommends parity in pay between the field staff and headquarter staff upto the rank of Assistants on two grounds—firstly the field staff are recruited through the same examination and they follow the same rigour as the Assistants of CSS and secondly there is no difference in the nature of functions discharged by both. Therefore to bring in parity as envisaged by the VI CPC, this Commission recommends bringing the level of Assistants of CSS as per with those in the field offices who are presently drawing GP of 4200. The pay of those Assistants/Stenographer who have in the past, been given higher Grade pay would be protected&#8221;. </i> </b></p>
<p><b><i> </i></b> The Assistants of Central Secretariat already got the benefit of fixing their pay with Grade pay of 4600/- and they enjoyed this benefit from 1.1.2006 to 31.12.2015 and their pay will be fixed based on this pay. In order to maintain the parity the same benefit should be extended to the Assistants of Survey of India also.</p>
<p><b>The name of Assistants should be changes as Junior Section Officer in the proposed Restructuring proposal.</b></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">04.</td>
<td valign="top">U.D.C.</td>
<td valign="top">The qualification for the post of UDC is fixed as Graduation. Many posts whose educational qualification are graduation are granted with a Grade pay of 4200/- or 2800/-.</p>
<p><b>The name of UDC should be changed as Administrative Assistant Grade I in the proposed Restructuring proposal.</b></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">05.</td>
<td valign="top">L.D.C.</td>
<td valign="top">The minimum qualification for the post of LDC has been changed from X to XII but the pay scale of LDC has not changed. The Grade pay for all other posts whose minimum qualification is XII is starting from 2400. For example Hindi Typist, Data Entry Operator, etc. An LDC has to do typing/data entry operation in addition to Preparation of bills, diary and despatch, file management, assistance related to reports/returns/estimates etc. Hence the grade pay of LDC should be Rs. 2400/-.</p>
<p><b>The name of UDC should be changed as Administrative Assistant Grade II in the proposed Restructuring proposal.</b></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div>
<h3 data-blogger-escaped-style="text-align: left;"><b>LDC/UDC Issues :-</b></h3>
<div data-blogger-escaped-style="text-align: justify;">
<p>7th Pay Commission has turned down the genuine issue of LDC &amp; UDC on the ground that the government has stopped direct recruitment for the clerical cadre and gradually phasing out the existing incumbents( Please see Para 11.22.100, Para 11.52.32, Para 11.52.32,. Para 7.7.37 &amp; 11.35.28).  Issuing of such an order without the knowledge of Staff side may not be possible. Thus reason given for rejection of the demand is not convincing.</p>
</div>
<div data-blogger-escaped-style="text-align: justify;"></div>
<div data-blogger-escaped-style="text-align: justify;">
<p>Besides Confederation/Staff Side JCM, several Departments had recommended upgradation of grade pay of LDC &amp; UDC of Administrative Offices especially the LDC&amp; UDCs of subordinate offices of Government of India.</p>
</div>
<div data-blogger-escaped-style="text-align: justify;"></div>
<div data-blogger-escaped-style="text-align: justify;">
<p>But the fact is that Staff Selection Commission is frequently conducting recruitment for the post of LDC. Combined higher secondary examination for the selection of LDC also has been conducted recently. Moreover, no alternative recommendation to replace the LDC post is given in the report.  It is to be noted that the normal ratio of LDC and UDC in subordinate offices is 3:1 and thus LDCs have been allocated responsible sections and in many smaller offices LDC alone is handling the work of entire Administration.  The direction set in the recommendation of the Commission is to contractorise all the Administrative posts below the post of Assistants. This should be prevented at any cost and a respectable pay scale for LDC &amp; UDC should be ensured. Without the active support of the Confederation/JCM this cannot be done.</p>
</div>
<div data-blogger-escaped-style="text-align: justify;"></div>
<h3 data-blogger-escaped-style="text-align: justify;">LDC &amp; DATA ENTRY OPERATOR</h3>
<div data-blogger-escaped-style="text-align: justify;">
<p>On the other hand rejecting Central Secretariat Clerical service demand of parity with DEO (Grade Pay 2400), the commission observes “Even though the entry requirements are similar, historically the pay scales of the two posts have been different. Besides, they comprise two distinct cadres with different set of roles and responsibilities. Hence, the demand for parity of pay of LDC with DEOs cannot be acceded to by the Commission.”(Para 11.35.38).</p>
</div>
<div data-blogger-escaped-style="text-align: justify;"></div>
<div data-blogger-escaped-style="text-align: justify;">
<p>Historically these cadres may be different set of roles but the fact is that functions of LDC are more complex than that of DEO and same was brought before the commission by various Associations/Administrative Authorities. Earlier pay Commissions have fixed Pay Scale to DEO considering their work on computer. But today LDCs are selected on the basis of their expertise in computer operation also.</p>
</div>
<div data-blogger-escaped-style="text-align: justify;">
<p>As you know, in subordinate offices DoPT manual is not followed for allocating work to LDCs there.  In order to bring the reality, some comments among the hundreds of comments posted in our web site/received through e-mail is given in annexure I, II &amp; III. Please go through it.</p>
</div>
<div data-blogger-escaped-style="text-align: justify;"></div>
<h3 data-blogger-escaped-style="text-align: justify;"><b>  Parity of pay of Assistant/Stenographers with Central Secretariat.</b></h3>
<div data-blogger-escaped-style="text-align: justify;">
<p>Sixth Pay Commission has recommended parity for Assistant of subordinate offices with the Assistants of Central Secretariat and recommended Rs. 4200 grade pay for the genuine reason given in its report. But while implementing the report, grade pay of Assistant of Central Secretariat has been increased to Rs. 4600. All the Associations/Federations including this Association had demanded parity of pay of these cadres with Central Secretariat. JCM Staff Side through its memorandum had demanded parity with the Assistant/Stenographers of Central Secretariat. But in place of increasing the grade pay of Assistants/Stenographers of Subordinate offices, the Pay Commission has reduced the grade pay of Central Secretariat Assistant/Stenographers (Para 7.1.4(J). While implementing 7th Pay Commission Report, Government may not accept the degradation of the grade pay of the cadres of Central Secretariat. Thus necessary action to keep the Grade Pay (4600) of Assistant/stenographers of Subordinate offices including NSSO Offices at par with their counterpart at Central Secretariat is required.</p>
</div>
<div data-blogger-escaped-style="text-align: justify;"></div>
<div data-blogger-escaped-style="text-align: justify;">
<p>The Assistants of Central Secretariat have  already got the benefit of fixing their pay with Grade pay of 4600/- and they enjoyed this benefit from 1.1.2006 to 31.12.2015 and their pay will be protected as per the recommendations of the 7th Pay Commission Report.  In order to obtain the parity between the Assistants of Central Secretariat and Field offices,  the  benefit of fixing their pay with a Grade pay of Rs. 4600/- from 1.1.2006 to 31.12.2015 should  be extended to the Assistants of Survey of India also.</p>
</div>
<div data-blogger-escaped-style="text-align: justify;"></div>
<div data-blogger-escaped-style="text-align: justify;">
<p>Similarly, the Non Functional Selection Grade granted to the UDCs of Central Secretariat has also been withdrawn by the 7th CPC in its report (Para 7.1.4(J). Our demand is that the NFSG may be restored and the benefit of the same should be extended to the UDCs of subordinate offices also.</p>
</div>
<h3 data-blogger-escaped-style="text-align: justify;"><b> Grant of MACP on Promotional Hierarchy:</b></h3>
<div data-blogger-escaped-style="text-align: justify;">
<p>The report of the Commission is confusing and contradictory. Please see Para 5.1.12, 5.1.44, 7.4.8, 74.13, 11.52.45 etc. The Pay Commission has drafted MACP recommendation to fool the employees and giving benefit to Government.  MACP should be granted on hierarchical scale, if both Levels are same it should be given in the immediately next level.</p>
</div>
<div data-blogger-escaped-style="text-align: justify;"></div>
<h3 data-blogger-escaped-style="text-align: justify;">Transport Allowance</h3>
<div data-blogger-escaped-style="text-align: justify;">
<p>In A1 cities the employees crossed the limit of Pay Rs. 7440/ in pay band 5200-200200 was getting transport allowance Rs. 1600+DA. But 7th CPC has recommended only Rs. 1350 for these employees. The disparity is to be removed.</p>
</div>
<div data-blogger-escaped-style="text-align: justify;"></div>
<h3 data-blogger-escaped-style="text-align: justify;">Abolition of interest free advance:</h3>
<div data-blogger-escaped-style="text-align: justify;">
<p>Pay Commission has recommended abolition of 12 advances including, Festival Advance, LTC Advances, Tour/Tr TA Advance Medical Advance etc. This will affect the touring staff and low paid employees. If this recommendation is accepted, no low paid employee can avail LTC.</p>
</div>
<div data-blogger-escaped-style="text-align: justify;"></div>
<h3 data-blogger-escaped-style="text-align: justify;">Abolition/Reduction of Care Taking Allowance</h3>
<div data-blogger-escaped-style="text-align: justify;">
<p>As per recommendation contained in Para 8.3.23 of the 7th CPC report, the present care taking allowance has been abolished and in place Extra Work Allowance at  a  uniform rate of 2  percent  of Basic Pay per month. This will affect detrimentally to the caretaking work in various NSSO Offices especially in FOD Offices where permanent care takers are not appointed and the person assigned the duties of caretaking are doing heavy responsibilities.</p>
</div>
<div></div>
<div>
<div>
<div data-blogger-escaped-style="text-align: justify;">
<p>On other hand, pay fixation on promotion from UDC to Assistant immediate next pay scale is found more beneficial than the hierarchical promotion. Fixation of a UDC drawing Rs. 10960+2400 promoted to Assistant is given below:</p>
</div>
</div>
<div></div>
<div>
<p><b>Fixation on Pay scale hierarchy i.e., Rs, 2800 GP</b></p>
<table border="1" width="100%" cellspacing="2" cellpadding="2">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top">1/1/2016 10960+2400=13360 X 2.57 34335</td>
<td valign="top">34300</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">Increment on 1.7.2016</td>
<td valign="top">35300</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">Increment on Promotion</td>
<td valign="top">1059</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">Pay fixed at higher stage in 2800 Grade Pay</td>
<td valign="top">37000</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><b><br />
</b> <b>Fixation on Promotional hierarchy i.e. Rs 4200 GP</b></p>
<table border="1" width="100%" cellspacing="2" cellpadding="2">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top">1/1/2016 10960+2400=13360 X 2.57 34335</td>
<td valign="top">34300</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">Increment on 1.7.2016</td>
<td valign="top">35300</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">Increment on Promotion</td>
<td valign="top">1059</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">Pay fixed at higher stage in 4200 Grade Pay</td>
<td valign="top">36500</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div>
<p>Similar deficiencies may be noticed in other cases also. For similar cases multiplication factor should be increased.  Two  increments should be granted  on promotion.</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p>This may also be looked into.</p>
<div data-blogger-escaped-style="text-align: justify;">
<p>Kindly consider the above facts while implementing the report of 7th Central Pay Commission.</p>
</div>
<div data-blogger-escaped-style="text-align: justify;"></div>
<div data-blogger-escaped-style="text-align: justify;">
<p>We oppose Performance based Incentive System because it is not appropriate.   Marks acquired in APAR should not be linked with grant of Increment, promotion  &amp; MACP.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
</div>
<div data-blogger-escaped-style="text-align: justify;"></div>
<div data-blogger-escaped-style="text-align: justify;">
<p><b>D.A. should be merged with basic pay whenever it crosses  50%. </b></p>
</div>
<div data-blogger-escaped-style="text-align: justify;"></div>
<div data-blogger-escaped-style="text-align: justify;">
<p>We oppose plan for Medical Insurance to Central Govt. employees.   CGHS facilities may be improved.</p>
</div>
<div data-blogger-escaped-style="text-align: right;">
<p style="text-align: right;">SECRETARY GENERAL,<br />
MINISTERIAL STAFF ASSOCIATION<br />
SURVEY OF INDIA</p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<p>Authority: www.msasoi.com</p>
</div>
<p>The post <a href="https://centralgovernmentnews.com/points-to-be-taken-into-consideration-while-finalizing-the-7th-pay-commission-report-demands-by-msa-soi/">Points to be taken into consideration while finalizing the 7th Pay Commission Report: Demands by MSA, SoI</a> appeared first on <a href="https://centralgovernmentnews.com">CENTRAL GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES NEWS</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://centralgovernmentnews.com/points-to-be-taken-into-consideration-while-finalizing-the-7th-pay-commission-report-demands-by-msa-soi/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Parity between Assistant, SO of Ordnance Factory and CSS/CSSS Pay Scale: Judgement by HC citing &#8220;Equal pay for Equal Work&#8221;</title>
		<link>https://centralgovernmentnews.com/parity-assistant-ordnance-factory-csscsss-pay-scale-judgement-hc-citing-equal-pay-equal-work/</link>
					<comments>https://centralgovernmentnews.com/parity-assistant-ordnance-factory-csscsss-pay-scale-judgement-hc-citing-equal-pay-equal-work/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2014 08:26:06 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[6CPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CSS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employees News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LDC-UDC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rank Pay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CSSS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grade pay of SO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[High Court Order]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ministerial Staff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New pay scale benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ordnance factory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ordnance factory employees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pay Anomaly]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://centralgovernmentnews.com/?p=7948</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Parity between Assistant, SO of Ordnance Factory and CSS/CSSS Pay Scale: Judgement by HC citing &#8220;Equal pay for Equal Work&#8221; Parity between Assistant, SO of Ordnance Factory and CSS/CSSS Pay Scale: Landmark Judgement by HC citing &#8220;Equal pay for Equal Work&#8221;.  Text of Hindustan Times News reproduced below:-      New pay scale benefits for ordnance [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://centralgovernmentnews.com/parity-assistant-ordnance-factory-csscsss-pay-scale-judgement-hc-citing-equal-pay-equal-work/">Parity between Assistant, SO of Ordnance Factory and CSS/CSSS Pay Scale: Judgement by HC citing &#8220;Equal pay for Equal Work&#8221;</a> appeared first on <a href="https://centralgovernmentnews.com">CENTRAL GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES NEWS</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Parity between Assistant, SO of Ordnance Factory and CSS/CSSS Pay Scale: Judgement by HC citing &#8220;Equal pay for Equal Work&#8221;</b></p>
<p>Parity between Assistant, SO of Ordnance Factory and CSS/CSSS Pay Scale: Landmark Judgement by HC citing &#8220;Equal pay for Equal Work&#8221;.  Text of Hindustan Times News reproduced below:-</p>
<p><strong>     New pay scale benefits for ordnance staff too: HC</strong></p>
<p>UNIFORMITY Citing ‘equal pay for equal work’ principle, Delhi High Court tells Centre to grant pay parity to ordnance factory employees</p>
<p>Employees at Ordnance Factories (OF) – who have been contesting their omission from the benefits of the sixth pay commission for over seven years have finally more than one reason to rejoice.</p>
<figure style="width: 219px" class="wp-caption alignleft"><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" src="https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-0b5Sv0tt9gM/VGJPrLV_3qI/AAAAAAAAAvY/HhFqs_SloRQ/s320/delhi%2Bhigh%2Bcourt%2Bdecision%2Bordnance%2Bfactory.jpg" alt="" width="219" height="320" /><figcaption class="wp-caption-text">New Pay Scale</figcaption></figure>
<p>Reining in the principle of ‘equal pay for equal work’ at public offices, the Delhi High Court has directed the Centre to grant pay parity to employees in the OF with that of identically ranked official in the Central Secretariat Service (CSS) and Central Secretariat Stenographer’s Service (CSSS).</p>
<p>The direction will be applied retrospectively from 2006 — when the sixth CPC was implemented. Not only this, the HC order will come in handy for the employees of the OF when the seventh central pay commission is implemented.</p>
<p>The HC order came in response to a petition filed by Ordnance Factory Employees Association challenging the decision of the finance ministry declining their request for the assistants working in the OF Board to be given same pay scale as was given to similarly placed officials in CSS, CSSS, Ar my Headquarters, UPSC and other services.</p>
<p>The starting point of discrimination against the employees of the OF Board came soon before the acceptance of recommendation of the sixth CPC when a pay upgradation of employees of CSS and CSSS was made in September 2006.</p>
<p>While the OFs and Armed Forces Head Quarters (AFHQs) — both non-secretariat organization — were excluded from the pay upgradation, the latter took the matter to the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) and got an order in its favour.</p>
<p>In the case of OF Board, the central government took the view that since it was a nonattached office working outside the Secretariat, there cannot be parity of pay scales. The OF Board was denied benefit of upgradation and the replacement scales given by the sixth CPC. The CAT, too, took a similar stand and denied any relief to the OF Board.</p>
<p>The matter finally reached the Delhi HC last year and after over a year of deliberation a bench of Justice S Ravindra Bhat and Justice Vipin Sanghi termed the discrimination meted out to the OF Board as “over-classification.”</p>
<p>The HC said the discrimination was illogical and artificial. It also took note that the cadre structure of CSS and CSSS is identical to that of the OF. In all the above organisations, the cadre of upper divisional clerks (UDCs) is filled by the feeder of the cadre of the lower divisional clerks (LDCs).</p>
<p>The cadre of assistants on the OF Board is filled by promotion from the feeder cadre of UDCs with at least five years of experience on regular basis.</p>
<p>“The OF Board was treated historically as equals to CSS/CSSS employees and enjoyed equal pay and all benefits flowing from equal pay,” the high court noted adding, “This was based on the previous four instances of determinations by successive pay commissions that they performed equal work.”</p>
<p>Source Image provided by http://aiamshq.blogspot.in/2014/11/blog-post.html</p>
<p>Source: http://lobis.nic.in/dhc/SRB/judgement/14-10-2014/SRB14102014CW46062013.pdf</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://centralgovernmentnews.com/parity-assistant-ordnance-factory-csscsss-pay-scale-judgement-hc-citing-equal-pay-equal-work/">Parity between Assistant, SO of Ordnance Factory and CSS/CSSS Pay Scale: Judgement by HC citing &#8220;Equal pay for Equal Work&#8221;</a> appeared first on <a href="https://centralgovernmentnews.com">CENTRAL GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES NEWS</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://centralgovernmentnews.com/parity-assistant-ordnance-factory-csscsss-pay-scale-judgement-hc-citing-equal-pay-equal-work/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Memorandum to 7th CPC: All India Customs Ministerial Employees Federation</title>
		<link>https://centralgovernmentnews.com/memorandum-to-7th-cpc-all-india-customs-ministerial-employees-federation/</link>
					<comments>https://centralgovernmentnews.com/memorandum-to-7th-cpc-all-india-customs-ministerial-employees-federation/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2014 06:17:01 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[7CPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employees News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rank Pay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[6th CPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[7th CPC Grade Pay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AICMEF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CBDT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CBEC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Confederation News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EMPLOYEES FEDERATION]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Memorandum to 7th cpc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ministerial Staff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seventh Pay Commission]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://centralgovernmentnews.com/?p=7387</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Memorandum to 7th CPC: All India Customs Ministerial Employees Federation  ALL INDIA CUSTOMS MINISTERIAL EMPLOYEES&#8217; FEDERATION HEAD QUARTER: 15/1, STRAND ROAD, CUSTOM HOUSE, KOLKATA &#8211; 700 001 Tele Fax: (33) 2230 5530, E-mail ID : aicmef@yahoo.co.ln Affiliated to: Confederation of Central Government Employees &#38;&#8217;Workers, New Delhi UNIT OFFICES: MUMBAI : KOLKATA: CHENNAI : VIZAG : [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://centralgovernmentnews.com/memorandum-to-7th-cpc-all-india-customs-ministerial-employees-federation/">Memorandum to 7th CPC: All India Customs Ministerial Employees Federation</a> appeared first on <a href="https://centralgovernmentnews.com">CENTRAL GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES NEWS</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Memorandum to 7th CPC: All India Customs Ministerial Employees Federation</strong></p>
<div style="text-align: center;"> ALL INDIA CUSTOMS MINISTERIAL EMPLOYEES&#8217; FEDERATION</div>
<div style="text-align: center;">HEAD QUARTER: 15/1, STRAND ROAD, CUSTOM HOUSE, KOLKATA &#8211; 700 001</div>
<div style="text-align: center;">Tele Fax: (33) 2230 5530, E-mail ID : aicmef@yahoo.co.ln</div>
<div style="text-align: center;">Affiliated to: Confederation of Central Government Employees &amp;&#8217;Workers, New Delhi</div>
<div style="text-align: center;">UNIT OFFICES: MUMBAI : KOLKATA: CHENNAI : VIZAG : COCHIN</div>
<div style="text-align: center;">Recognised by Government of India F.No.B12017/4/2004AD.IV.A under CCS(RSA)Rules,1993</div>
<p>S. Kaliamurthy<br />
PRESIDENT,CHENNAI<br />
09848234942</p>
<div style="text-align: right;">SAUGATA CHAKRABORTY</div>
<div style="text-align: right;">GENERAL SECRETARY,KOLKATA</div>
<div style="text-align: right;">09433402024</div>
<div>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;<br />
Ref. No</div>
<div style="text-align: right;">Date:</div>
<p>The Secretary, Seventh Central Pay Commission,<br />
Post Box No. 4599, Hauz Khas P.O,<br />
New Delhi 110 016<br />
E-mail:- secy-7cpc@nic.in</p>
<p>Sub: &#8211; <strong>Submission of Memorandum on issues of the All India Customs Ministerial Employees’ Federation under Central Board of Excise &amp; Customs-reg.</strong></p>
<p>Respected Sir/Madam,</p>
<p>I am submitting herewith the Memorandum on issues of the Customs Ministerial Staffs, Chemical Staffs(Group-‘C’) and Marine Staffs working in the field formation of the Central Board of Excise &amp; Customs, North Block, New Delhi-110 001.</p>
<p>I on behalf of my Federation would like to request before your goodself to allow this Federation to submit an oral deposition with documents before 7th CPC for redressal and we would also like to request you to give us opportunity for supplementary submission, if any, for your kind consideration.</p>
<p>Thanking you.</p>
<div style="text-align: right;">Yours faithfully,</div>
<div style="text-align: right;"> Sd/-</div>
<div style="text-align: right;"> [SAUGATA CHAKRABORTY]</div>
<div style="text-align: right;"> Secretary General</div>
<div>
<blockquote><p><strong>MEMORANDUM  TO THE  SEVENTH PAY COMMISSION</strong></p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>Submitted by</p>
<div><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>ALL INDIA CUSTOMS MINISTERIAL EMPLOYEES FEDERATION</strong></span></div>
<div>H.Q-15/1,Strand Road, Custom House,Kolkata-700001.</div>
<div>Email: aicmef[at]yahoo.co.in</div>
<div>Ph.- (0)9433402024,033 22305530</div>
<div></div>
<div style="text-align: center;"><strong>PREAMBLE:</strong></div>
<p>This Federation i.e. All India Customs Ministerial Employees Federation (AICMEF) is the largest Ministerial Federation recognized by the Central Board of Excise and Customs(CBEC) after satisfying the Membership over 35% of working strength of the Ministerial Staff as laid down in the CCS(RSA)Rules,1993. It is known to all that CBEC is functioning under Department of Revenue whereas another wing is existing in the name of Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT). This CBDT &amp; CBEC is the major Revenue earning organization of Govt. of India. This Federation, AICMEF have their members all over India in the ‘Customs’ domain.</p>
<p>Ministerial Staff in the Customs Field formations are participating directly in the process of Revenue earning and is engaged in different technical departments such as Import Noting, Appraising, Export, Preventive etc. and is also playing a pivotal role in doing the housing keeping job.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>PROFILE OF MINSTERIAL CADRE UNDER CBEC:</strong></span></p>
<p>Other than Group ‘A’ cadres there are mainly two types of cadres (1) Executive cadres such as Appraiser (Group ‘B’ Gazetted), Superintendent of Customs (Preventive)(Group ‘B’ Gazetted), Inspector (Preventive Officer &amp; Examiner) and (2) Ministerial cadres. Ministerial cadres at present consists of Chief Accounts Officer (Group ‘A’), Administrative Officer (Group ‘B’ Gazetted). DY. Office Superintendent (Group ‘B’ non-gazetted), Sr. Tax Assistant (Group ‘B’non-gazetted), Tax Assistant(Group ‘C’) and Lower Division Clerk (Group ‘C’).</p>
<table border="1" cellspacing="3" cellpadding="3">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="33%"><strong>Name</strong> <strong>of the post </strong></td>
<td valign="top" width="33%"><strong>5th CPC </strong></td>
<td valign="top" width="33%"><strong>6th CPC </strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="33%">Chief Accounts Officer</td>
<td valign="top" width="33%">8000/&#8211;275-13500/-</td>
<td valign="top" width="33%">PB-3 with G.P.5400/-</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="33%">Administrative Officer</td>
<td valign="top" width="33%">6500/&#8211;200-10500/-</td>
<td valign="top" width="33%">PB-2 with G.P 4600/-</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="33%">Dy. Office Superintendent</td>
<td valign="top" width="33%">5500/&#8211;175-9000/-</td>
<td valign="top" width="33%">PB-2 with G.P 4200/-</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="33%">Sr. Tax Assistant</td>
<td valign="top" width="33%">5000/&#8211;150-8000/-</td>
<td valign="top" width="33%">PB-2 with G.P 4200/-</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="33%">Tax Assistant</td>
<td valign="top" width="33%">4000/&#8211;100-6000/-</td>
<td valign="top" width="33%">PB-1 with G.P 2400/-</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="33%">Lower Division Clerk</td>
<td valign="top" width="33%">3050/&#8211;75-4590/-</td>
<td valign="top" width="33%">PB-1 with G.P 1900/-</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><strong>Distinctive function of Ministerial Cadre: </strong></p>
<p>It is evident from the designation that these Ministerial Cadres are directly involved with the Revenue collection procedure which is unique to this Ministerial cadres because the Ministerial cadres in other department are involved with the house keeping job only. It is not out of context to mention here that the Staff Selection Commission takes a separate examination to appoint Tax Assistant in the Revenue Department i.e. in the CBEC &amp; CBDT.</p>
<p>Read full memorandum <a href="https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B0rqvSYMJv2IMnpDakZwR2wtSGM/edit" target="_blank">click here</a><br />
Source: Confederation</p>
<p>#Memorandum to 7th cpc, #CBEC, #Ministerial Staff, #Seventh Pay Commission, #Confederation News, #7CPC, #7th CPC Grade Pay, #AICMEF, #CBDT, #EMPLOYEES FEDERATION, #6th CPC, #Employees News</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://centralgovernmentnews.com/memorandum-to-7th-cpc-all-india-customs-ministerial-employees-federation/">Memorandum to 7th CPC: All India Customs Ministerial Employees Federation</a> appeared first on <a href="https://centralgovernmentnews.com">CENTRAL GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES NEWS</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://centralgovernmentnews.com/memorandum-to-7th-cpc-all-india-customs-ministerial-employees-federation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>DoPT may put 3-years gap for posts in ministerial staff</title>
		<link>https://centralgovernmentnews.com/dopt-may-put-3-years-gap-for-posts-in-ministerial-staff/</link>
					<comments>https://centralgovernmentnews.com/dopt-may-put-3-years-gap-for-posts-in-ministerial-staff/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2014 09:43:22 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[General news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Central Government News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dopt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ministerial Staff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ministerial staff postings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UPA]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://centralgovernmentnews.com/?p=6855</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>DoPT may put 3-years gap for posts in ministerial staff After tweaking the order on minister’s staff, the DoPT is now reviewing the government order to relax the criteria and the likely changes are expected to limit the “time period” of serving a minister in the last three years of the UPA regime for banning [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://centralgovernmentnews.com/dopt-may-put-3-years-gap-for-posts-in-ministerial-staff/">DoPT may put 3-years gap for posts in ministerial staff</a> appeared first on <a href="https://centralgovernmentnews.com">CENTRAL GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES NEWS</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>DoPT may put 3-years gap for posts in ministerial staff</strong></p>
<p>After tweaking the order on minister’s staff, the DoPT is now reviewing the government order to relax the criteria and the likely changes are expected to limit the “time period” of serving a minister in the last three years of the UPA regime for banning appointments of officers and personal staff to the new NDA ministers.<br />
A revised order is likely to be issued once the DoPT’s new proposal gets cleared by the PMO. The Prime Minister is the cabinet minister in-charge of DoPT and is the competent authority.<br />
It can be recalled that the appointment of a private secretary to home minister Rajnath Singh got stalled after his choice in Alok Singh, a 1995 batch IPS officer, did not get the PMO’s clearance as Mr Singh had served as private secretary to former external affairs minister Salman Khurshid.<br />
The appointments of Abhinav Kumar and Rajesh Kumar, as PS to minister of state for Home Kiren Rijiju and minister of state for external affairs V.K. Singh respectively, were also not cleared. Abhinav was PS with Shashi Tharoor and Mr Rajesh was PS with Chandresh Kumari Katoch.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.asianage.com/india/dopt-may-put-3-years-gap-posts-ministerial-staff-981" target="_blank">www.asianage.com<br />
</a>[http://www.asianage.com/india/dopt-may-put-3-years-gap-posts-ministerial-staff-981]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://centralgovernmentnews.com/dopt-may-put-3-years-gap-for-posts-in-ministerial-staff/">DoPT may put 3-years gap for posts in ministerial staff</a> appeared first on <a href="https://centralgovernmentnews.com">CENTRAL GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES NEWS</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://centralgovernmentnews.com/dopt-may-put-3-years-gap-for-posts-in-ministerial-staff/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Re-designation of Superintendent Gde-I in CPWD Ministerial Cadre has not been accepted by MoUD in view of 7th CPC</title>
		<link>https://centralgovernmentnews.com/re-designation-of-superintendent-gde-i-in-cpwd-ministerial-cadre-has-not-been-accepted-by-moud-in-view-of-7th-cpc/</link>
					<comments>https://centralgovernmentnews.com/re-designation-of-superintendent-gde-i-in-cpwd-ministerial-cadre-has-not-been-accepted-by-moud-in-view-of-7th-cpc/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2014 15:39:39 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[7CPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employees News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[7th CPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cadre Restructuring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPWD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ministerial Staff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MoUD]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://centralgovernmentnews.com/?p=6109</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Re-designation of Superintendent Gde-I in CPWD Ministerial Cadre has not been accepted by MoUD in view of 7th CPC Re-designation of Superintendent Gd-I in subordinate ministerial cadre of CPWD has not been accepted by the MoUD keeping in view setting up of 7th CPC.  The text of DG, CPWD&#8217;s OM is reproduced below:- No. 48(1)1412013-S&#38;D/196 [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://centralgovernmentnews.com/re-designation-of-superintendent-gde-i-in-cpwd-ministerial-cadre-has-not-been-accepted-by-moud-in-view-of-7th-cpc/">Re-designation of Superintendent Gde-I in CPWD Ministerial Cadre has not been accepted by MoUD in view of 7th CPC</a> appeared first on <a href="https://centralgovernmentnews.com">CENTRAL GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES NEWS</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Re-designation of Superintendent Gde-I in CPWD Ministerial Cadre has not been accepted by MoUD in view of 7th CPC</strong></p>
<p>Re-designation of Superintendent Gd-I in subordinate ministerial cadre of CPWD has not been accepted by the MoUD keeping in view setting up of 7th CPC.  The text of DG, CPWD&#8217;s OM is reproduced below:-</p>
<p>No. 48(1)1412013-S&amp;D/196</p>
<p style="text-align: right;">Date: 21 Mar 2014</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>OFFICE MEMORANDUM</strong></span></p>
<p>Sub: <strong>Re-designation of Superintendent Gd-I in subordinate ministerial cadre of CPWD.</strong></p>
<p>The issue related to re-designation of Superintendent Gd-I in subordinate ministerial cadre of CPWD was taken up by this Directorate, however, finally the same has not been accepted by the Ministry of Urban Development keeping in view setting up of 7th CPC etc.</p>
<p>2.    All concerned are informed of the above decision of the Ministry.</p>
<p style="text-align: right;">
sd/-<br />
(Krishna Pal Singh)<br />
Director(S&amp;D)</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">
Source: http://cpwd.gov.in/WriteReadData/org_stru/9819.pdf</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://centralgovernmentnews.com/re-designation-of-superintendent-gde-i-in-cpwd-ministerial-cadre-has-not-been-accepted-by-moud-in-view-of-7th-cpc/">Re-designation of Superintendent Gde-I in CPWD Ministerial Cadre has not been accepted by MoUD in view of 7th CPC</a> appeared first on <a href="https://centralgovernmentnews.com">CENTRAL GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES NEWS</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://centralgovernmentnews.com/re-designation-of-superintendent-gde-i-in-cpwd-ministerial-cadre-has-not-been-accepted-by-moud-in-view-of-7th-cpc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Granting of Grade Pay hierarchy to UDC to the next promotional post of Assistants &#8211; Ministerial Staff Association</title>
		<link>https://centralgovernmentnews.com/granting-of-grade-pay-hierarchy-to-udc-to-the-next-promotional-post-of-assistants-ministerial-staff-association/</link>
					<comments>https://centralgovernmentnews.com/granting-of-grade-pay-hierarchy-to-udc-to-the-next-promotional-post-of-assistants-ministerial-staff-association/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Aug 2013 03:26:22 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[LDC-UDC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MACP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACP-MACP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Central Government Employees News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LDC/UDC Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MACP Scheme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MACP Scheme Clarification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MACP to UDC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ministerial Staff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ministerial Staff Association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Survey of India]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://centralgovernmentnews.com/?p=3796</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Granting of Grade Pay hierarchy to UDC to the next promotional post of Assistants &#8211; Ministerial Staff Association Secretary General of Ministerial Staff Association writes a detailed letter to the Secretary of Department of Science and Technology regarding the discrepancies in implementation of MACP Scheme to the ministerial staff working in the department of Survey [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://centralgovernmentnews.com/granting-of-grade-pay-hierarchy-to-udc-to-the-next-promotional-post-of-assistants-ministerial-staff-association/">Granting of Grade Pay hierarchy to UDC to the next promotional post of Assistants &#8211; Ministerial Staff Association</a> appeared first on <a href="https://centralgovernmentnews.com">CENTRAL GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES NEWS</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Granting of Grade Pay hierarchy to UDC to the next promotional post of Assistants &#8211; Ministerial Staff Association</p>
<p></strong>Secretary General of Ministerial Staff Association writes a detailed letter to the Secretary of Department of Science and Technology regarding the discrepancies in implementation of MACP Scheme to the ministerial staff working in the department of Survey of India.</p>
<p>Particularly the Upper Divisional Clerk (UDC) may be granted 4200 Grade Pay under the MACP Scheme to next promotional post of Assistant…</p>
<p>The detailed letter has been uploaded in the official blog of Ministerial Staff Association, for your ready reference we have reproduced and given below…</p>
<p style="text-align: center;">
<p>GRANT OF THE BENEFITS UNDER MACP TO UPPER DIVISION CLERK (UDC) AND OTHER MINISTERIAL STAFF OF SURVEY OF INDIA IN THE HIERARCHY OF THE PROMOTIONAL GRADE – REQUEST FOR.</p>
<p>MINISTERIAL STAFF ASSOCIATION</p>
<p>SURVEY OF INDIA, CENTRAL HEADQUARTERS : DEHRADUN</p>
<p>C/o NPG, Hathibarkala Estate, Dehradun-248 001</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">
No.CHQ- 31 /MSA/2013</p>
<p style="text-align: right;">Dated 14 -8-2013</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">
To<br />
The Secretary to the Government of India,<br />
Department of Science and Technology,<br />
(Ministry of Science and Technology)<br />
Technology Bhawan, New Mehrauli Road, New Delhi-110 016.</p>
<p>(Through the Surveyor General of India)</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">
SUB: <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>GRANT OF THE BENEFITS UNDER MACP TO UPPER DIVISION CLERK (UDC) AND OTHER MINISTERIAL STAFF OF SURVEY OF INDIA IN THE HIERARCHY OF THE PROMOTIONAL GRADE – REQUEST FOR.</strong></span></p>
<p>Sir,<br />
With due respect, I would like to submit the following few lines on the subject for favour of your kind consideration and necessary action:-</p>
<p>1) That the Ministerial Staff of Survey of India are recruited to the post of Lower Division Clerk (LDC) in the then pay scale of Rs.950-1500. The said pay scale was revised to Rs.3050-4590 w.e.f. 1-1-1996 in terms of the Fifth CPC. The said pre-revised pay scale was revised to Pay Band-1(Rs.5200-20200)+Grade Pay Rs.1900 w.e.f. 1-1-2006 in terms of the Sixth CPC.</p>
<p>2) That as per the provisions contained in the Recruitment Rules for the Ministerial Staff, the LDCs are eligible to be promoted to the post of UDC on completion of 8 years regular service by DPC (1s promotion). It is also provided in the said Rules that the LDCs can be promoted to the post of UDCs after completion of 3 years regular service subject to passing of the 25% the Limited Departmental Competitive Examination for promotion to the post of UDCs (1st Promotion). Accordingly, the LDCs are promoted to the post of UDCs by DPC/LDCE in the pay scale of Rs.4000-6000.</p>
<p>3) That it is also provided in the said Recruitment Rules of Ministerial Staff that UDCs in the pay scale of Rs.4000-6000 shall be eligible for promotion to the post of Assistants by DPC (2nd promotion) in the pay scale of pre-revised Rs.5000-8000 (previous pay scale Rs.1400- 2300) after 5 years service as UDC.</p>
<p>4) That it is also provided in the Recruitment Rules of Ministerial Staff that Assistants in the pay scale of Rs.5000-8000 shall be eligible for promotion to the post of Office Superintendent (Rs.5500-9000) by DPC (3rd promotion) after 3 years service as Assistant. But due to lack of appropriate promotional ratio, the incumbents are not granted promotion within the prescribed residency period and hence are stagnating in the same post. The Hierarchy Chart for the Ministerial Staff in Survey of India is annexed as Annexure-1 for your ready reference please.</p>
<p>5) That it is submitted that based on the recommendations of the Fifth CPC, Government of India introduced the Assured Career Progression Scheme (ACP Scheme) under DoP&amp;T’s OM No.35034/3/97-Estt. (D) dated 9-8-1999. The main objective of the Scheme was to deal “with the problem of genuine stagnation and hardships faced by the employees due to lack of promotional avenues”. In said Scheme, it was provided for grant of two financial upgradations in the promotional hierarchy of the cadre on completion of 12 and 24 years of service respectively, counted from the direct recruitment grade. The said benefits under the ACP shall be applicable w.e.f. 9-8-1999.</p>
<p>6) That at the time of the introduction of the ACP Scheme, there was an acute stagnation in the LDC, UDC and other cadres in the Ministerial Staff. Accordingly, most of the LDCs were granted 1st ACP in the next hierarchical grade i.e. in the pay scale of Rs.4000-6000 w.e.f. 9-8-1999 or on completion of 12 years. A number of LDCs and UDCs were also granted 1st and 2nd ACP in the 1st and 2nd promotional grade i.e. in the pay scale of Rs.4000-6000 and Rs.5000-8000 (Pre-revised pay scale of Assistant) respectively w.e.f. 9-8-1999 or on completion of 24 years of service.</p>
<p>7) That the Govt. of India implemented the recommendations of the Sixth CPC under Ministry of Finance’s Notification No.F.No.1/1/2008-IC dated 29-8-2008 effecting from 1-1-2006 and accordingly LDC. UDC, Assistant, Office Superintendent and Establishment &amp; Accounts Officers were placed in the pay structure furnished as under:-<strong></p>
<p></strong></p>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="5">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Sl. No.</td>
<td>Name of post</td>
<td>Pay scale as per Fifth CPC</td>
<td>Minimum service for promotion to next grade</td>
<td>Pay scale as per Sixth CPC</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1</td>
<td>LDC</td>
<td>Rs.3050-4590</td>
<td>8</td>
<td>Pay Band-1(Rs.5200-20200)+Grade Pay Rs.1900</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2</td>
<td>UDC</td>
<td>Rs.4000-6000</td>
<td>10</td>
<td>Pay Band-1(Rs.5200-20200)+Grade Pay Rs.2400</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>3</td>
<td>Assistant</td>
<td>Rs.5000-8000</td>
<td>5</td>
<td>Pay Band-2(Rs.9300-34800)+Grade Pay Rs.4200</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>4</td>
<td>Office Superintendent</td>
<td>Rs.5500-9000</td>
<td>3</td>
<td>Pay Band-2(Rs.9300-34800)+Grade Pay Rs.4200</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>5</td>
<td>Establishment &amp; Accounts Officer</td>
<td>Rs.7550-11500</td>
<td>&#8211;</td>
<td>Pay Band-2(Rs.9300-34800)+Grade Pay Rs.4600</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div></div>
<p style="text-align: left;">8) That the Govt. of India also issued orders regarding revised ACP Scheme i.e.  Modified ACP (MACP in short) under DoP&amp;T’s OM No.35034/3/2008-Estt. (D) dated 19-5-2009 for the Central Govt. Civilian Employees replacing the existing ACP Scheme with<strong> two financial upgradations</strong> in the hierarchy of the promotional grade on completion of 12 and 24 years of service counted from the direct entry grade to <strong>three financial upgradations</strong> on completion of 10, 20 and 30 years counted from the direct entry grade in the hierarchy of grade pay under MACP. As per the aforesaid orders, the benefit under the MACP is applicable from <strong>1-9-2008</strong>.</p>
<p>9) That the Surveyor General’s Office has decided to grant MACP to the Ministerial staff keeping the pay structure of LDC as PB-1(Rs.5200-20200)+Grade Pay Rs.1900 in view as entry grade pay structure and contended to grant the First, Second and Third MACP in the pay structure of PB-1 (Rs.5200-20200)+Grade Pay Rs.2000, PB-1(Rs.5200-20200)+Grade Pay Rs.2400 and PB-1(Rs.5200-20200)+Grade Pay Rs.2800 after completion of 10, 20 and 30 years of service as LDC/UDC respectively. As such, the said decision is detrimental to the interest of the cadre and discriminatory in nature.</p>
<p>10) That the following table shows how the benefits under MACP Scheme is less advantageous because of the fact that the MACP is granted in the hierarchy of the successive grade pay than the erstwhile ACP Scheme to the Ministerial Staff which was granted in the promotional hierarchy. An extract of the same is furnished hereunder :-<br />
<strong></strong></p>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="5">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Sl.No.</td>
<td>Entry Grade /<br />
Pay scale</td>
<td>1st Promotion /<br />
1st ACP /<br />
Pay scale (12 Years)</td>
<td>2nd Promotion /<br />
2nd ACP /<br />
Pay Scale (24 years)</td>
<td>&#8211;</td>
<td>Remarks</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1.</td>
<td>LDC (Entry Grade)<br />
Rs.3050-4590</p>
<p>Revised PB-1 (Rs.5200-20200)+ Grade Pay Rs.1900</td>
<td>UDC<br />
Rs.4000-6000</p>
<p>Revised PB-1 (Rs.5200-20200)+ Grade Pay Rs.2400</td>
<td>Assistant<br />
Rs.5000-8000</p>
<p>(Revised PB-2(Rs.9300-34800)+ Grade Pay Rs.4200</td>
<td>&#8211;</td>
<td>Advantageous</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1.</td>
<td>LDC (Entry Grade)<br />
Rs.3050-4590</p>
<p>Revised PB-1 (Rs.5200-20200)+ Grade Pay Rs.1900</td>
<td>1st MACP<br />
(10 Years)</p>
<p>Revised PB-1 (Rs.5200-20200)+ Grade Pay Rs.2000</td>
<td>2nd MACP<br />
(20 Years)</p>
<p>Revised PB-1 (Rs.5200-20200)+ Grade Pay Rs.2400</td>
<td>3rd MACP<br />
(30 Years)</p>
<p>Revised PB-1 (Rs.5200-20200)+ Grade Pay Rs.2800</td>
<td>Less<br />
Advantageous</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div></div>
<div>11)That it is found that the LDCs/UDCs who have completed 24 years service as on 31-8- 2008 (before the cut-off date of 1-9-2008), were have been granted the benefits of 2nd ACP in the pay scale of Rs.5000-8000. As such, these UDCs have been placed in the revised pay structure of PB-2 (Rs.9300-34800) + Grade Pay Rs.4200, the UDCs who have not got the 2 nd ACP prior to 31-8-2008 have been placed in PB-1(Rs.5200-20200)+Grade Pay Rs.2800 towards 2nd MACP and thus deprived of the said benefits without any justified reason. A tables showing the discrimination meted out to the incumbents in UDCs is furnished hereinunder :-</div>
<div></div>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="5">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Sl. No.</td>
<td>Entry Grade /<br />
Pay scale<br />
Fifth CPC</td>
<td>1st Promotion /<br />
1st ACP /<br />
Pay scale (12 Years)<br />
(Fifth CPC)</td>
<td>Replacement<br />
Pay structure<br />
by the Sixth CPC</td>
<td>2 nd Promotion /<br />
2nd ACP /<br />
Pay Scale (24 years)<br />
(Fifth CPC)</td>
<td>Replacement<br />
Pay structure<br />
by the Sixth CPC</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1.</td>
<td>LDC</p>
<p>Rs.3050-4590</td>
<td>UDC</p>
<p>Rs.4000-6000</td>
<td>UDC<br />
PB-1 (Rs.5200-20200) +<br />
Grade Pay Rs.2400</td>
<td>Assistant<br />
Rs.5000-8000</td>
<td>PB-2(Rs.9300-34800) +<br />
Grade Pay Rs.4200</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div></div>
<div>12)That further,UDCs have been granted 2nd Financial upgradation under the MACP Scheme Surveyor General’s Office under No.C- 1553_/1902-MACP-Ministerial(II) dated 8.3.2011 in the pay structure of PB-1 (Rs.5200-20200)+Grade Pay of Rs.2800 instead of granting the same in the PB-2 (Rs.9300-34800) +Grade Pay Rs.4200 which the next promotional grade (Assistant) w.e.f. 1-9-2008 or on completion of 20 years service counted from the direct recruitment grade (Entry date).</div>
<div></div>
<div>13) That in the mean time, a point was raised in the National Council (JCM) for grant of MACP in the hierarchy of promotional grade instead of hierarchy of the grade pay. After thread bare discussion in the Joint Committee of the National Council (JCM), it was <strong>decided that the Cadre/Department may represent for grant of the MACP or ACP Scheme which shall be beneficial to the incumbents in that cadre</strong>. The decision, in this regard, was taken in the Second Meeting of the Joint Committee on MACP held under the Chairmanship of Joint Secretary (E), DoP&amp;T on 15-9-2010. The same was circulated under GOI. DoP&amp;T’s OM No.11/1/2010-JCA dated 6-10-2010. An extract from the decisions on item No.1 – Provide Grade Pay of the Next Promotional Post under MACP.</div>
<div></div>
<blockquote>
<p style="text-align: left;"><strong>As item No.1, 3, 8, 9, 29 &amp; 46 are similar, it was decided to club them together.</p>
<p>After detailed discussions on the issues, it was decided that Para 13 of MACPS shall be revised to the effect that Organizations / Cadres shall have the option to choose either the ACP Scheme or the MACP Scheme. Individual options, however, cannot be permitted. </strong></p>
</blockquote>
<p style="text-align: left;">
<div>14) That thereafter, the Third Meeting of the Joint Committee on MACP was held on 15-3-2011 and discussed the issue in the agenda item No.1,3,8,9 and 29 inter alia on Grant of Financial upgradation in the promotional hierarchy instead of Grade Pay hierarchy under MACP. An excerpt of the Minutes / decisions of the same circulated under DoP&amp;T’s OM No.11/1/2010-JCA dated 20-4-2011 is furnished hereunder:-</div>
<div></div>
<div>
<blockquote><p><strong>“ The Staff side reiterated their demand that the financial upgradation under the MACP Scheme should be granted in the promotional hierarchy of posts instead of Grade Pay hierarchy. The Staff Side stated that the erstwhile ACP Scheme was implemented on the recommendation of the 5th CPC and , as such, has become a part of the service conditions of the employees. The Staff Side, therefore, contended that the Government cannot impose the MACP Scheme thereby altering the service conditions to the detriment of the employees.<br />
</strong><strong><br />
</strong><strong>The Official Side stated that the 6th CPC recommended two financial upgradations in the Grade Pay hierarchy. However, the Government improved upon the recommendations of the 6th CPC and has implemented MACP Scheme with three financial upgradations in the Grade Pay hierarchy after 10, 20 and 30 years. Referring to earlier discussions held in the matter, the Official Side stated that the Government was willing to consider revision in para 13 of MACP Scheme to the effect that organizations/cadres shall have the option either to choose the ACP Scheme or the MACP Scheme. However, the Staff Side pointed out that such a dispensation will not be practical and hence there is a need to explore other alternatives to solve the issue. After discussion, it was agreed that there is no need to change basic structure of MACP Scheme. However, there is need to separately examine those cases where MACP Scheme is less advantageous than the ACP Scheme. Accordingly, it was decided that the Official Side will write to the Ministry of Railways, Defence, Urban Development, Home and the Department of Posts to forward the information in respect of the specific categories of employees where the MACPS is less advantageous than the erstwhile ACP Scheme. The Official Side also requested the Staff Side to collect and forward such information to the Department of Personnel and Training for further necessary action…” </strong></p></blockquote>
</div>
<div></div>
<div>15) That then, the point was again discussed in the Joint Committee on MACP held on 27-7- 2012. An extract of the Minutes of the said meeting on the agenda item No.1 Grant of MACP in the promotional hierarchy, is furnished hereunder:-</div>
<div></div>
<div>
<blockquote><p><strong>1. Grant of MACP in the promotional hierarchy.- “…. The Staff side stated that the employees who were in service prior to 1-1-2006 had the right to retain first two financial upgradations in the promotional hierarchy and the Government cannot alter the existing services conditions adversely. The Official side, however, sated that since MACPS is in supersession of earlier ACP Scheme, this cannot be agreed to. The Staff Side insisted that at least option be given to individual employees in this regard to facilitate him/ her to opt either ACP or MACP for availing benefit of financial upgradation. The Staff Side was insistent that either MACPS should be in promotional hierarchy or individual options should be given to the employees.<br />
</strong><strong><br />
</strong><strong>The Official Side stated that it was not possible to agree to individual options and if they have any alternate suggestions, the Staff Side could come back with them.” </strong></p></blockquote>
</div>
<div></div>
<div>16) That thereafter, the further progress in the matter is not known.</div>
<div></div>
<div>17) That it is learnt that one employee named Raj Pal of CAT, Chandigarh designated as Photo copier, approached the Hon’ble CAT, Chandigarh Bench for grant of MACP in the hierachy in the anology of a similar post of Hindi Typist and filed OA No.1038/CH/2010 in the case of Raj Pal Vs.Union of India representaed by the Department of Personnel and Training and others. The Hon’ble CAT, Chandigarh in the order dated 31-5-2011 allowed the aforesaid OA and accordingly the said employee was granted MACP in the hierarchy of the promotional post of the comparable cadre i.e. Hindi Typist. Extracts of the aforesaid judgement of the Hon’ble CAT, Chandigarh is furnished as under:-</div>
<div>
<blockquote><p><strong>“13. It has been settled that the ACP would be granted on the completion of the required years of service in the hierarchy of posts for the posts of LDC/Hindi Typist, and not in the next higher scale in the recommended scales. The same principle would have to be applicable in regard to grant of MACP to the applicant. The only difference is that while in case of ACP two financial upgradations were granted on completion of 12 and 24 years of service, in case of MACP, three upgradations on the intervals of 10, 20 and 30 years of service.</p>
<p>15. Be that as it may, the principle enuniciated and settled by the Tribunal / High Court for grant of ACP cnnot be changed and the same principle would apply for grant of MACP to him. The only difference is of number of years is required to be completed. We find no justification to take a different view in the matter.</p>
<p>16. For the foregoing reasons, the impugned order dated 9-8-2010 (Annexure A-1) qua the applicant, fixing his pay in PB-1 with grade pay of Rs.2400/- under the second MACP, and the order dated 9-8-2010 (Annexure A-2) are hereby quashed and set aside. Consequently, the respondents are directed to grant second financial upgradation to the applicant under the MACPS from due date fix his pay in the hierarchy of posts decided in his case earlier and to pay the resultant arrears without interest within a period of 2 months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order….” </strong></p></blockquote>
</div>
<div></div>
<div>18) That thereafter, the Union of India represented by the Secretary, Department of Personnel and Training and others approached the Hon’ble High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in CWP No.19387 of 2011 (O&amp;M). The Hon’ble High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh, in the order dated 19-10-2011, dismissed the CWP and issued orders at page 5 and 6 of the same, which reads as under:-</div>
<div>
<blockquote><p><strong>“… An order adversely affecting an employee in terms of grant of financial upgradations had already been passed which entailed civil consequences and as such CAT has rightfully proceeded to adjudicate for the petitioners to the effect that the earlier scheme of ACP stood superseded by MACP Scheme is being noticed only to be rejected. The entire objective of introduction of ACP/MACP Scheme is to alleviate stagnation as regards an employee who has a number of regular years of service on the same post without any avenue of promotion. It is such circumstances that a financial incentive is sought to be granted to an employee upon completion of a certain number of years of service on the same post. Under the ACP Scheme of 1999, the financial upgradations were to be granted upon completion of 12 years and 24 years of regular service whereas under the MACP Scheme such financial upgradations are envisaged upon completion of 10, 20 or 30 years of service, the contention raised on behalf of the petitioners if accepted would defeat the very objective for which such Schemes have been introduced.”</strong></p></blockquote>
</div>
<div>
<blockquote><p><strong>“We find no infirmity in the order dated 31-05-2011 passed by CAT in OA No.1038/CH of 2010. The petition stands dismissed.” </strong></p></blockquote>
</div>
<div></div>
<div>19)That then the Union of India represented by the Secretary, Department of Personnel and Training and others approached the Hon’ble Supreme Court by way of filing SLP (SLP No.cc 7467/2013) challenging the order dated 19-10-2011 in CWP No.19387 of 2011 of the Hon’ble High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh. The Hon’ble Supreme Court has dismissed the aforesaid SLP in the order dated 15-4-2013.</div>
<div>
Photo copies of the aforesaid Court orders are enclosed herewith as<strong> Annexure-2</strong> for favour of your kind perusal please.</div>
<div></div>
<div>20)That in the meant time, one Sanjay Kumar, UDC and 18 other UDCs of the Central Government under the Ministry of Defence who are in the pay structure of PB-1(Rs.5200- 20200)+Grade Pay Rs.2400 have approached the Hon’ble CAT, Principal Bench, New Delhi in OA No.904/2012 with the prayer for grant of 2nd MACP in the hierachy of promotional post i.e. Assistant in the PB-2 (Rs.9300-34800)+Grade Pay Rs.4200. The Hon’ble CAT, Principal Bench, New Delhi, in the order dated 26-11-2012, in the aforesaid OA relied upon the decision dated 19-10-2011 passed by the Hon’ble High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh and in CWP No.19387 of 2011 (O&amp;M) (Union of India and others Vs. Raj Pal and another) and the order dated 31-5-2010 passed by the Hon’ble CAT, Chandigarh Bench in OA No.1038/CH/2010, allowed the OA and issued orders as under :-</div>
<div>
<blockquote><p><strong>“7. In our considered view, the present OA is squaely covered by the aforesaid judgement of Chandigarh Bench, as upheld by the Hon’ble High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh.</p>
<p>8. In fact, the respondents have wrongly interpreted the terms and conditions mentioned in the MACP Scheme, issued by the Deptt. Of Personnel and Training, in the case of the applicants. By the said Scheme, the eligible government servants are to be placed in the immediate next higher grade pay in the hierarchy of the recommended revised pay bands and grade pay and not merely in the next higher scale of pay as per the recommendations of the 6th Pay Commission. In the hierarchy, after the scale of UDC the next scale is that of Assistant. Therefore, the respondents should have given the next higher grade pay and pay band attached to the next promotional post in the hierarchy, namely,the Assistants carrying the pay scale of Rs.9300-34800 and the grade pay of Rs.4200.</p>
<p>9. In view of above position, the OA is allowed. The respondents are directed to grant scale of pay of Rs.9300-34800 with grade pay of Rs.4200 attached to the said promotional post of Assistant / OS from the due date to the applicant.</p>
<p>10. The aforesaid direction shall be complied with within the period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of the order, subject to the other conditions mentioned in the MACP Scheme.”</strong></p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p><strong>A photo copy of the aforesaid order dated 26-11-2012 issued by the Hon’ble CAT, Principal Bench, New Delhi in OA No.904/2012 in case of Sanjay Kumar, UDC and 18 others is enclosed herewith as Annexure-3 for your ready reference please. </strong></p></blockquote>
</div>
<div></div>
<div>21) That the UDCs and other Ministerial Staff in Survey of India are similarly situated with the applicants of the aforesaid OAs in the matter of grant of MACP in the hierarchy of promotional post as such the MACP in case of UDCs and other Ministerial Staff may kindly be considered in the light of the spirit contained in the aforesaid judicial pronouncements which has attained its finality.</div>
<div></div>
<div>2. In view of the facts and circumstances submitted above, it is respectfully requested that necessary orders may kindly be issued to grant of the benefits of financial upgradations under MACP to LDC, UDC and Assistant etc. in their respective promotional hierarchy from their due date in the light of the decision passed by the Hon’ble CAT, Principal Bench, in the order dated 26- 11-2012 in OA No.904/2012 in case of Sanjay Kuamr, UDC and others Vs. Union of India and others read with the order dated 31-5-2010 passed by the Hon’ble CAT, Chandigarh Bench in OA No.1038/CH/2010 the order dated 19-10-2011 upheld by the Hon’ble High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in CWP No.19387 of 2011 (O&amp;M) (Union of India and others Vs. Raj Pal and another) and order dated 15-4-2013 passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in SLP No.cc- 7467/2013 in this regard, in which act of your kindness, I shall be ever grateful to you.</div>
<div></div>
<div>Thanking you,</div>
<div><strong>Yours faithfully,  </strong></div>
<div><strong>( MANOJ KUMAR SHARMA ) </strong></div>
<div><strong>SECRETARY GENERAL MINISTERIAL STAFF ASSOCIATION</strong></div>
<div></div>
<div>Annexure-1</div>
<div></div>
<div><strong>HIERARCHY CHART OF MINISTERIAL STAFF IN SURVEY OF INDIA</strong></div>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<div>ESTABLISHMENT &amp; ACCOUNTS OFFICER</div>
<div>Gp.B-(GAZETTED) – 29</div>
<div>Pay scale Rs.2375-3500 (Fourth CPC)</div>
<div>Pre-revised pay scale Rs. 7450-11500 (Fifth CPC)</div>
<div>Revised PB-2(Rs.9300-34800)+Grade Pay of Rs.4600 (Sixth CPC)</div>
<div>(4th Promotional Grade)</div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div>↑</div>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>OFFICE SUPERINTENDENT<br />
Gp.B-(NON-GAZETTED) – 69<br />
Pay scale Rs.1640-2900 (Fourth CPC)<br />
Pre-revised pay scale Rs. 5500-9000 (Fifth CPC)<br />
Revised PB-2(Rs.9300-34800)+Grade Pay of Rs.4200 (Sixth CPC)<br />
(3RD Promotional Grade)</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>ASSISTANT /HEAD CLERK<br />
Gp.B-(NON-GAZETTED) – 286<br />
Pay scale Rs.1400-2300 (Fourth CPC)<br />
Pre-revised pay scale Rs. 5000-8000 (Fifth CPC)<br />
Revised PB-2(Rs.9300-34800)+Grade Pay of Rs.4200 (Sixth CPC)<br />
(2ND Promotional Grade)</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
<div>↑</div>
<div>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>UPPER DIVISION CLERK (UDC)<br />
Gp.C-(NON-GAZETTED) – 545<br />
Pay scale Rs.1200-2040 (Fourth CPC)<br />
Pre-revised pay scale Rs. 4000-6000<br />
(Fifth CPC) Revised PB-1(Rs.5200-20200)+Grade Pay of Rs.2400 (Sixth CPC)<br />
(1st Promotional Grade)</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
<div>↑</div>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<div>LOWER DIVISION CLERK (LDC)<br />
Gp.C-(NON-GAZETTED) – 235<br />
Pay scale Rs.950-1500 (Fourth CPC)<br />
Pre-revised pay scale Rs. 3050-4590<br />
(Fifth CPC) Revised PB-1(Rs.5200-20200)+Grade Pay of Rs.1900 (Sixth CPC)<br />
(Entry Grade)</div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div>
<div><strong><br />
</strong></div>
</div>
<div>
<div><strong>MINISTERIAL STAFF ASSOCIATION </strong></div>
</div>
<div>
<div><strong>SURVEY OF INDIA, CENTRAL HEADQUARTERS : DEHRADUN </strong></div>
</div>
<div>
<div><strong>C/o NPG , Hathibarkala Estate, Dehradun-248 001</strong></p>
<div>No.CHQ- /MSA/2013</div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div>Dated 16-8-2013</div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div>To</div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div>All Branch Secretaries.</div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div>Dear friends,</div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div>It is learnt about the contents of decision dated 26-11-2012 passed by the Hon’ble CAT, Principal Bench, New Delhi in <strong>OA No.904/2012 between Sanjay Kumar, UDC and 18 others Vs. Secretary, MOD and 2 others</strong> for grant of MACP in the hierarchy of the promotional post. On perusal of the same, it is found that the aforesaid judgement was relied upon the decision dated 31-5-2011 of the Hon’ble CAT, Chandigarh Bench in<strong> OA No.1038/CH/2010 in the case of Rajpal S/o Tilak Ram Vs. UOI and others</strong> issued orders for grant of MACP in the hierarchy of the promotional post. The Hon’ble High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in their order dated 19-10-2011 in CWP No.19387/ 2011 has upheld the aforesaid decision dated 31-5-2011 of the Hon’ble CAT, Chandigarh Bench. I have received the copies of the aforesaid CAT, Chandigarh and High Court orders along with order dated 15-4-2013 on SLP No.cc-7467/2013 passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India and the gist of these Court decisions are furhished as under:-</div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div></div>
</div>
</div>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="5">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<div><strong>Sl. No. </strong></div>
</td>
<td>
<div><strong>OA No./ CWP No.</strong></div>
</td>
<td>
<div><strong>Parties</strong></div>
</td>
<td>
<div><strong>Date of Order </strong></div>
</td>
<td>
<div><strong>Name of Court</strong></div>
</td>
<td>
<div><strong>Remarks </strong></div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div>1</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>OA No.1038/CH/2010</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>Raj Pal s/o Tilak Ram, Photo Copier in CAT, Chandigarh.</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>31-5-2011</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>CAT, Chandigarh</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>OA is allowed for grant of MACP in the hierarchy of promotional post.</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div>2</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>CWP No.19387 of 2011 (O&amp;M)</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>Union of India represented by DoP&amp;T and others Vs. Raj Pal and another.</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>19-10-2011</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>Order dated 31-5-2011 of Hon’ble CAT, Chandigarh is upheld. CWP filed by Respondents dismissed.</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div>3</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>SLP No.cc-7467 of 2013 against order dated 19-10-2011 of the Hon’ble High Court</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>Union of India represented by DoP&amp;T and others Vs. Raj Pal and another.</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>15-4-2013</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>Supreme Court of India</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>SLP filed by the Union of India is dismissed.</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div>4</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>OA No.904/2012</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>Sanjay Kumar, UDC and 18 others Vs. UOI represented by Ministry of Defence and others.</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>26-11-2012</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>CAT, Principal Bench, New Delhi.</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>OA is allowed for grant of MACP in next promotional post i.e. Assistant in PB-2+Grade Pay Rs.4200.</div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div>
<div></div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div>2. Accordingly, model draft representation addressing to the SG which was prepared by Com. P.K. Das, Secretary, Bhubaneshwar Branch &amp; Dy.Secy General(CHQs) should be submitted by the UDCs preferably who are having 10 years of service as UDC or total 20 years service as LDC and UDC for consideration and grant of MACP in hierarchy of the promotional post i.e. pay structure of Assistant. In case of UDC having lesser service, they may also submit the representation with modifications. You are requested to arrange in submitting the same to the authorities through proper channel and intimate the same to me for information and further action.</div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div>3. In this connection you are also requested to kindly visit our website to know the content of my letter written to DST in the matter for your information.</div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div>4. In the mean time, we have discussed the matter with Com. S.K. Vyas, Member National Council (JCM) and Member of the Joint Committee on MACP and requested him to take up the issue with DoP&amp;T / in next meeting of Joint Committee on MACP which is likely to be held during September, 2013.</div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div>Thanking you,</div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div></div>
<div></div>
<div style="text-align: right;">Yours sincerely,</div>
</div>
</div>
<div style="text-align: right;">
<div>
<div>(MANOJ KUMAR SHARMA)</div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div style="text-align: right;">Secretary General.</div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div></div>
<div>Source : www.msasoi.com</div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div>[http://www.msasoi.com/PDFS/MACP_letter%20to%20DST%20by%20MSA.pdf]</div>
</div>
</div>
<p>The post <a href="https://centralgovernmentnews.com/granting-of-grade-pay-hierarchy-to-udc-to-the-next-promotional-post-of-assistants-ministerial-staff-association/">Granting of Grade Pay hierarchy to UDC to the next promotional post of Assistants &#8211; Ministerial Staff Association</a> appeared first on <a href="https://centralgovernmentnews.com">CENTRAL GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES NEWS</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://centralgovernmentnews.com/granting-of-grade-pay-hierarchy-to-udc-to-the-next-promotional-post-of-assistants-ministerial-staff-association/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
