Government of India
Ministry of Defence
(Department of Defence)
D(Civ-l)

Subject: Circulation of OM issued by DoP&T regarding MACP Scheme.

All concerned are requested to download the under mentioned Govt. Orders issued by Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances & Pensions, (Department of Personnel & Training) from the website of DoP&T for necessary action/compliance. The provisions contained therein are duly applicable to Defence Civilian Employees paid from Defence Service Estimates. The following are being uploaded by this office on the MoD (Department of Defence) website under the link “Employees’ Corner”.

Supreme Court Order delaying the effective date of the MACP Scheme w.e.f. 01.01.2006

(Rupesh Kumar)
OSD, D(Civ-l)
Telefax 23012414

MoD ID No. 27(2)/2017-D(Civ-l) dated 08.09.2021

The post Dopt order regarding MACP Clarification appeared first on CENTRAL GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES NEWS.

GRANT OF MACP ON PROMOTIONAL HIERARCHY- Indian Ordnance Factories Gazetted Officers Association writes to Government

Indian Ordinance Factories Gazetted Officers Association (IOFGOA)had written a letter (given below) to the Government in view of the CAT Principle Bench New Delhi judgment dated 01/05/2014, directing the Government to implement MACP on promotional hierarchy within 3 months from the date of the judgment. Since the Government has not taken any action on the matter so far the Association has filed contempt of Court and the next date of hearing of the case is 11/11/2014.

As regards the SLP filed against Shri Babu Ram & Ors, according Shri S B Chaubey, General Secretary, his Association has decided to bear the expense of one Advocate to defend the case in Supreme Court.

-TKR Pillai, GS

Source: http://aiamshq.blogspot.in/

The post GRANT OF MACP ON PROMOTIONAL HIERARCHY- Indian Ordnance Factories Gazetted Officers Association writes to Government appeared first on CENTRAL GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES NEWS.

Shiva Gopal Mishra
Secretary

National Council (Staff Side)
Joint consultative Machinery for Central government employees
13-C, Ferozshah Road, New Delhi –110001
E Mail : nc.jcm.np@gmail.com
Ph: 23382286

16th May, 2014

No.NC-JCM-2014/MACP

The Secretary,
Department of Personnel and Training,
North Block,
New Delhi

Sub: Financial upgradation in the next promotional grade Hierarchy under MACP
Ref: Your letter No.P-13025/11/2014-AT dated 4.4.2014
Your letter No.P-26012/5/2011-AT dated 19.8.2013

Dear Sir,
You have granted financial upgradation to Shri Rajpal in the Promotional hierarchy under MACP in compliance of direction of Hon’ble Central Administrative Tribunal Chandigarh Bench dated 31.5.2011 in O.A. No.1038/CH/2010 Rajpal Vs UOI & Others.

You have treated it as a judgement in peronum and not a judgment in rem so far as other employees covered under MACP are concerned.

Your plea is that SLP No.7967/2013 filed by the Department/Government against the judgment of Hon’ble Court Chandgarh in C W PNo.1938/2011 was discussed on technical grounds and not on merit in this case. The ground was insufficient explanation given to condone the delay in refilling the SLP.

In this connection I may bring to your kind notice that Supreme Court in catina of cases (i.e.G.C.Ghosh Vs UOI [(1992) 19 ATC 94 SC] dated 20.7.98) has ruled that decision taken in one specific case either by the judiciary or the Government should be applied to all identical cases (i.e.,similarly cirumentanced) without forcing other employees to approach the Court of law for identical remedy or relief.

Since whether MACP should be granted to next promotional hierarchy or next grade pay hierarchy is a common issue applicable to all Government employees the decision in the case of Rajpal should be made applicable to all Government employees who are granted financial upgradation under MACP.

Since you have already granted MACP in next promotional hierarchy to Rajpal it has been absolute and has to be implemented in the case of all Government employees who are similarly placed under MACP.

I, therfore request you to reconsider and suitably modify the MACP Scheme providing for financial upgradation in the promotional hierarchy.

Thanking you.

Yours faithfully,
sd/-
(Shiva Gopal Mishra)
Secretary

Source: http://aiamshq.blogspot.in/

The post MACP ON PROMOTIONAL HIERARCHY – JCM (STAFF SIDE) WRITES TO SECRETARY, DOPT appeared first on CENTRAL GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES NEWS.

GRANT OF MACP ON PROMOTIONAL HIERARCHY:

LIST OF CASES FILED

The list of cases filed on the subject is given below for your reference.

RAJPAL Vs UoI & Others
1 OA No.1038/CH/2010 (Advocate : Mr. V.K.Verma) Raj Pal s/o Tilak Ram, CAT, Chandigarh 31.5.2011 CAT, Chandigarh. OA is allowed for grant of MACP in the hierarchy of Promotional post.

2 CWP No.19387 of (O&M)(Advocate : D.K.Bhisnoi) Union of India represented by DoP&T and others Vs. Raj Pal and another. 19.10.2011 High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh Order dated 31-5-2011 of Hon’ble CAT, Chandigarh is upheld. CWP filed by Respondents dismissed.

3 SLP No.cc-7467 of 2013 against order dated 19-10-2011 of the Hon’ble High Court Union of India represented by DoP&T and others Vs. Raj Pal and another. 15.4.2013 Supreme Court of India SLP filed by the Union of India is dismissed

SANJAY KUMAR & Ors Vs UoI & Ors

4 OA No.904/2012 (Mr. M.K.Bhardwaj) Sanjay Kumar, UDC and 18 others Vs. UOI nted byMinistry of Defense and others. 26.11.2012 CAT, Principal Bench, New Delhi. OA is allowed for grant of MACP in next promotional post i.e. Assistant in PB-2+Grade PayRs.4200.

5 W.P.(C) 4552/2013 [PENDING] (Mr. M.K. Bhardwaj) UNION OF INDIA Vs. SANJAY KUMAR & ORS. Delhi High Court Hearing Date Court No. 5 Next Date: 04/09/2014

M V Mahanan Nair Vs UoI & Ors

6 OA No.816/12 M.V.Mohanan Nair, S/o M.R.Vishwanathan Nair, Photocopier CAT, Ernakulam Bench & others Vs Union of India 29.1.2013 CAT, PrincipalBench Ernakulam Bench OA is allowed for consideration of MACP in the hierarchy of promotional post.

7 OP(CAT). NO.2000 OF 2013 (Z) UOI & ORS. .Vs. M.V. MOHANAN NAIR 24.06.2013 High court of Kerala at Ernakulam In the result, this original petition is dismissed in limine

8 Special Leave Petition (Civil) 21803 OF 2014 UOI & ORS. .Vs. M.V. MOHANAN NAIR Supreme Court of India PENDING

9 OA No.1798 of 2014 Advocate : Shri Yogesh Sharma Mahendra Kumar Dubey, S/o Sh. R.D. Dubey, Working as Programme Executive, In Doordarsan Kendra, Delhi VS UOI through the Secretary, Ministry of lnformation & Broadcastin 22.05.2014 Cat Delhi OA is allowed for consideration of MACP in the hierarchy of promotional post within a period of one month

KISHAN SWARUP SHARMA Vs SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE

10 OA No.2548/2014 MA No.2167/2014 (Advocate : Shri M.K.Bhardwaj Kishan Swarup Sharma, working as PPO(E), Meerut & 28 others V/S Secretary, Ministry of Agriculture, 31.07.2014 CAT, New Delhi OA is allowed For consider the case of the applicants in the light of the aforesaid orders

PRADEEP KUMAR Vs SECRETARY MIN. OF INFORMATION & BROADCASTING

11 OA No.988 of 2014 MA No.872 of 2014 (Advocate : Shri M.K. Bhardwaj Pradeep Kumar. AE (C) Rohini, Delhi & 20 others VS Secretary, Ministry of Information & Broadcasting, Shastri Bhawan. New Delhi 22.03.2014 CAT. New Delhi in view of the above position. we dispose of this OA at the admission stage itself with the direction to the respondents to consider the representations of the applicants in the light of the judgment of Punjab and Haryana High Court in CWP No.19387/2011 (supra) as upheld by the Apex Court in SLP (CC) No.7467/2013(supra) and decide their cases under intimation to them. The aforesaid exercise shall be completed within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs.

12 O.A. No. 1834/2014 Advocate: Shri Yogesh Sharma. Mohd Hamid Hussain, Working as APRO (Defence), Sr.Grade Group B Officer In the office of: DPR, Ministry of Defence New Delhi- & 34 others VS UOI through the Secretary, Ministry of Information and Broadcasting, 23.05.2014 Central Administrative Tribunal PrincipalBench New Delhi In view of the aforesaid submission made by the applicants and the documents available on record. we dispose of this OA at the admission stage itself with a direction to the respondents to consider the case of the applicants in terms of the aforesaid orders within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. if the applicants are similarly placed, they shall also be treated alike

OM PRAKASH Vs SECRETARY, NCERT

13 OA 864/2014 Advocate: Shri M.K. Bhardwaj) Shri Om Prakash NCERT, New Delhi VS Secretary (NCERT) New Delhi 12.3.2014 Central Administrative Tribunal PrincipalBench, New Delhi In view of the above position. we dispose of this OA at the admission stage itself with the direction to the respondents to consider the representations of the applicants in the light of the judgment of Punjab and Haryana High Court in CWP No.19387/2011 (supra) as upheld by the Apex Court in SLP (CC) No.7467/2013(supra) and decide their cases under intimation to them. The aforesaid exercise shall be completed within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a cop of this order.

14 W.P.(C) 3608/2014 NCERT,New Delhi VS Shri Om Prakash & others 14.07.2014 High court of Delhi at New Delhi CWP filed by Respondents dismissed.

BABU RAM VS UoI

15 O.A. 1281/CH/2012 ADVOCATE: SHRI ROHIT SETH Sh. Babu Ram, working as Upper Division Clerk, working in the Central Administrative Tribunal, opposite Shivalik View Hotel, Sector 17, Chandigarh VS UOI 09.05.2013 CAT CHNDIGARH BENCH allow this OA in terms of the view obtained in terms of the view obtained in the OA. 1038/CH/11and the judgments (Annexures A-11 to A-13). The compliance of the order must ideally come about within two months from the date a copy of this order is presented in the office of the competent authority.

16 CWP No. 24279 of 2013 U.O.I. .Vs. BABU RAM & ORS. 07.11.2013 HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA see order of even date passed in CWP No.24278 of 2013 (UOI and another versus Smt.Reeta Devi and another

17 Special Leave to Petition (Civil)10435 OF 2014 U.O.I. .Vs. BABU RAM & ORS Supreme Court of India Pending

DHIRENDER SINGH & Ors Vs UoI

18 Civil Writ Petition No.24253 of 2013 Date of Decision: U,O.I. .Vs. DHIRENDER SINGH & ORS. 07.11.2013 High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh For orders, see order of even date passed in CWP No.24278 of 2013 (Union of India and another versus Smt. Reeta Devi and another).

19 Special Leave to Petition(Civil)…. 10436 OF 2014 U.O.I. .Vs. DHIRENDER SINGH & ORS. Supreme Court of India Pending

20 O.A. 12/CH/2013 By Advocate: Mr.Madan Mohan Smt. Reeta Devi, Senior Library Attendant, CAT Bench. Chandigarh. Versus Union of India 22.05.2013 Cat Chandigarh Bench After going through the judgment passed in the case of Raj Pal (supra), we are in full agreement with the learned counsel for the parties. Accordingly, the present original application is allowed in same term as of Raj Pal (supra). Consequently, we quash the orders at Annexures A-1 & A-2. The respondents are further directed to grant the benefit of 2nd MACP in the pay band of Rs.9300-34800 with grade pay of Rs.4600/- from 1.3.2009 (which is the pay scale of next post in the hierarchy). The respondents are directed to comply with the judgment within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

21 CWP No. 24278 of 2013 Union of India VS Smt. Reeta Devi, & and others 07.11.2014 High Court Of Punjab &Haryana CWP filed by Respondents dismissed

22 Special Leave Petition(Civil) 22181 OF 2014 U.O.I. & ORS. Vs. REETA DEVI Supreme Court of India pending

NARAYAN KALITA Vs UoI

23 O.A. No. 040/00052/2014 Narayan Kalita CPWD Guwahati VS UOI Represented by Secretary GOI, Ministry of Urban and Develoment Date of order 25.06.2014 Date of Delivery of Order 7.8.2014 CAT Guwahati Bench OA is allowed. for grant of MACP in the hierarchy of Promotional post. Respondent is directed to grant scale of pay (PB-3) of Rs. 15600-39100 + Grade pay 6600/-

24 OA( 1727/2014) was filed by CPWD Engineers‘ Association in regarding MACP as per promotional hierarchy on 19.5.2014 CAT, Principal Bench, New Delhi on next date of its hearing has been fixed by CAT on 24/09/2014

25 case filed by the Junior Clerks of Railway -OA No. 1509 of 2013 CAT Kolkata next date of its hearing has been fixed by CAT on 8th Dec. 2014

The post List of cases filed on grant of MACP on Promotional Hierarchy appeared first on CENTRAL GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES NEWS.

Dear friends,
Some of our (anonymous) friends have written in their comments that SLP filed by the DoPT (SLP(Civil)(CC)8271,10791, 10435 & 10436) against the dismissal of the Writ Petition on granting of MACP on promotional hierarchy by Higher Court Chandigarh/Ernakulam are being listed before the Supreme Court. Latest position of the above SLP chronologically is given below:

TKR Pillai
General Secretary

Source: http://aiamshq.blogspot.in/

The post MACP ON PROMOTIONAL HIERARCHY: LISTING OF THE SLP FILED BY THE DOP&T-REG appeared first on CENTRAL GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES NEWS.

IMPORTANT CAT JUDGEMENT

DECLINING REGULAR PROMOTION BEFORE THE DATE OF IMPLEMENTATION OF ACP OR MACP SCHEME SHOULD NOT BE A BAR FOR GRANTING ACP/MACP

Refusal to accept promotion, earlier to 09.08.1999 when the ACP scheme was promulgated, does not make an employee ineligible for grant of first financial benefits under ACP scheme when the scheme came into force only on 09.08.1999

Facts: The Applicant (who was appointed on 08.03.1980), while working as Radio Mechanic in India Meteorological Department refused his promotion due to family circumstances, when his promotion order was issued on 30.07.1998.

The Assured career Progression Scheme came into force on 09.08.1999. The Applicant having completed 12 years of service and stagnating in the same post of Radio Mechanic was rejected for the financial benefit of ACP on the ground that he refused his promotion when offered on 30.07.1998 earlier to the introduction of ACP scheme on 09.08.1999.

Modified Assured Career Progression Scheme (MACP) was introduced for financial upgradation on 19.05.2009. As per this scheme, an employee will be entitled for three financial upgradation after completion of 10, 20 and 30 years of continuance of service. The Applicant became eligible for 1st ACP in 2000 and 2nd MACP in 2010. The grievance of the Applicant is that, he was denied 1st ACP and 2nd MACP. Hence he filed this OA challenging the Office Orders 10/11-12-2008 and 20-9-2010 whereby he was denied the financial upgradation.

The Respondents state that he refused promotion issued by Order dated 30.07.1998. In terms of DoP&T O. M. No. 35034/1/1997 Establishment (D) (Vol. IV), dated 18.07.2001, the Applicant cannot be said to stagnate in the same post. Hence the 1st ACP benefits was refused. The Applicant annexed the judgement of Bombay Bench of the Tribunal as appeared in Swamynews of July, 2008.

The Bombay Bench of the CAT held that “If an employee has refused the promotion before the enforcement of ACP Scheme, the facts would remain that he has actually not been given any financial upgradation which he could have been before regular promotion. He remains on the scale of pay still stagnated”. In view of this clarification, the clarification of Respondents cannot be accepted. Ernakulam Bench of CAT in OA No. 768 of 2005 considered condition No. 10 makes it amply clear that if an employee is accepting ACP benefit, he is deemed to have given unqualified acceptance for regular promotion on occurrence of vacancy subsequently”. That precludes factoring of past refusal while given ACP benefit.

In view of the above, refusals of promotion earlier to 9-8-1999, has no effect on the grant of financial benefit under ACP scheme. Hence, the clarification given no Doubt No. 38 by DoP&T cannot be accepted in this case as the Applicant herein refused promotion earlier to the coming of ACP Scheme. In that view, refusal of grant of 2nd financial upgradation under MACP scheme amount to punishing him for the second time. Hence, the eligibility of benefits under ACP scheme has to be recknoned on the actual date namely 9-8-1999. Hence declaining promotion earlier to 9-8-1999 is no reason to deny the first ACP introduced on 9-8-1999. Hence, a direction was given to Respondents to grant the Applicants benefits under the ACP scheme irrespective of the fact of their refusal of promotion earlier to 9-8-1999. Time given for implementation was 6 weeks.

In view of the above, same relief given by Bombay Bench is to be followed in this case also.

In the result, the impugned Order, dated 10/11-12-2008 and 20-9-2010 are set aside. The Respondents are directed to grant financial benefits under the ACP scheme to the Applicant in 12 weeks from the date of receipt of this order.

This the OA stands allowed.

(Shri. Ganesh Bhavrao Shrote v. Secretary, Ministry of Earth Sciences Mausam Bhavan, New Delhi, New Delhi, 8/2014, SwamynewS 98, (Bombay), date of judgement 5-8-2013)

NB: Reproduced from Swamy’s News August 2014-Tribunal Judgements

Source: http://confederationhq.blogspot.in/
[http://confederationhq.blogspot.in/2014/08/important-cat-judgement-declining.html]

The post Important Cat Judgement regarding MACP appeared first on CENTRAL GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES NEWS.

The successive Pay Commission as well as the Governments has not resolved the issues of the LDC & UDC working the subordinate offices. All our friends are therefore requested to please take up the issue before the 7th CPC in its own importance. Materials/references to be used during the oral evidence are published in this web site.

TKR Pillai
General Secretary

Source: http://aiamshq.blogspot.in/

#MACP, #MACP Scheme, #MACP Scheme Clarification, #Clarification on MACP,# LDC Grade Pay Issues, #MACP on Promotional Hierarchy

The post MACP on Promotional Hierarchy to Ministerial Staff appeared first on CENTRAL GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES NEWS.

Secretary General of Ministerial Staff Association writes a detailed letter to the Secretary of Department of Science and Technology regarding the discrepancies in implementation of MACP Scheme to the ministerial staff working in the department of Survey of India.

Particularly the Upper Divisional Clerk (UDC) may be granted 4200 Grade Pay under the MACP Scheme to next promotional post of Assistant…

The detailed letter has been uploaded in the official blog of Ministerial Staff Association, for your ready reference we have reproduced and given below…

GRANT OF THE BENEFITS UNDER MACP TO UPPER DIVISION CLERK (UDC) AND OTHER MINISTERIAL STAFF OF SURVEY OF INDIA IN THE HIERARCHY OF THE PROMOTIONAL GRADE – REQUEST FOR.

MINISTERIAL STAFF ASSOCIATION

SURVEY OF INDIA, CENTRAL HEADQUARTERS : DEHRADUN

C/o NPG, Hathibarkala Estate, Dehradun-248 001

No.CHQ- 31 /MSA/2013

Dated 14 -8-2013

To
The Secretary to the Government of India,
Department of Science and Technology,
(Ministry of Science and Technology)
Technology Bhawan, New Mehrauli Road, New Delhi-110 016.

(Through the Surveyor General of India)

SUB: GRANT OF THE BENEFITS UNDER MACP TO UPPER DIVISION CLERK (UDC) AND OTHER MINISTERIAL STAFF OF SURVEY OF INDIA IN THE HIERARCHY OF THE PROMOTIONAL GRADE – REQUEST FOR.

Sir,
With due respect, I would like to submit the following few lines on the subject for favour of your kind consideration and necessary action:-

1) That the Ministerial Staff of Survey of India are recruited to the post of Lower Division Clerk (LDC) in the then pay scale of Rs.950-1500. The said pay scale was revised to Rs.3050-4590 w.e.f. 1-1-1996 in terms of the Fifth CPC. The said pre-revised pay scale was revised to Pay Band-1(Rs.5200-20200)+Grade Pay Rs.1900 w.e.f. 1-1-2006 in terms of the Sixth CPC.

2) That as per the provisions contained in the Recruitment Rules for the Ministerial Staff, the LDCs are eligible to be promoted to the post of UDC on completion of 8 years regular service by DPC (1s promotion). It is also provided in the said Rules that the LDCs can be promoted to the post of UDCs after completion of 3 years regular service subject to passing of the 25% the Limited Departmental Competitive Examination for promotion to the post of UDCs (1st Promotion). Accordingly, the LDCs are promoted to the post of UDCs by DPC/LDCE in the pay scale of Rs.4000-6000.

3) That it is also provided in the said Recruitment Rules of Ministerial Staff that UDCs in the pay scale of Rs.4000-6000 shall be eligible for promotion to the post of Assistants by DPC (2nd promotion) in the pay scale of pre-revised Rs.5000-8000 (previous pay scale Rs.1400- 2300) after 5 years service as UDC.

4) That it is also provided in the Recruitment Rules of Ministerial Staff that Assistants in the pay scale of Rs.5000-8000 shall be eligible for promotion to the post of Office Superintendent (Rs.5500-9000) by DPC (3rd promotion) after 3 years service as Assistant. But due to lack of appropriate promotional ratio, the incumbents are not granted promotion within the prescribed residency period and hence are stagnating in the same post. The Hierarchy Chart for the Ministerial Staff in Survey of India is annexed as Annexure-1 for your ready reference please.

5) That it is submitted that based on the recommendations of the Fifth CPC, Government of India introduced the Assured Career Progression Scheme (ACP Scheme) under DoP&T’s OM No.35034/3/97-Estt. (D) dated 9-8-1999. The main objective of the Scheme was to deal “with the problem of genuine stagnation and hardships faced by the employees due to lack of promotional avenues”. In said Scheme, it was provided for grant of two financial upgradations in the promotional hierarchy of the cadre on completion of 12 and 24 years of service respectively, counted from the direct recruitment grade. The said benefits under the ACP shall be applicable w.e.f. 9-8-1999.

6) That at the time of the introduction of the ACP Scheme, there was an acute stagnation in the LDC, UDC and other cadres in the Ministerial Staff. Accordingly, most of the LDCs were granted 1st ACP in the next hierarchical grade i.e. in the pay scale of Rs.4000-6000 w.e.f. 9-8-1999 or on completion of 12 years. A number of LDCs and UDCs were also granted 1st and 2nd ACP in the 1st and 2nd promotional grade i.e. in the pay scale of Rs.4000-6000 and Rs.5000-8000 (Pre-revised pay scale of Assistant) respectively w.e.f. 9-8-1999 or on completion of 24 years of service.

7) That the Govt. of India implemented the recommendations of the Sixth CPC under Ministry of Finance’s Notification No.F.No.1/1/2008-IC dated 29-8-2008 effecting from 1-1-2006 and accordingly LDC. UDC, Assistant, Office Superintendent and Establishment & Accounts Officers were placed in the pay structure furnished as under:-

8) That the Govt. of India also issued orders regarding revised ACP Scheme i.e.  Modified ACP (MACP in short) under DoP&T’s OM No.35034/3/2008-Estt. (D) dated 19-5-2009 for the Central Govt. Civilian Employees replacing the existing ACP Scheme with two financial upgradations in the hierarchy of the promotional grade on completion of 12 and 24 years of service counted from the direct entry grade to three financial upgradations on completion of 10, 20 and 30 years counted from the direct entry grade in the hierarchy of grade pay under MACP. As per the aforesaid orders, the benefit under the MACP is applicable from 1-9-2008.

9) That the Surveyor General’s Office has decided to grant MACP to the Ministerial staff keeping the pay structure of LDC as PB-1(Rs.5200-20200)+Grade Pay Rs.1900 in view as entry grade pay structure and contended to grant the First, Second and Third MACP in the pay structure of PB-1 (Rs.5200-20200)+Grade Pay Rs.2000, PB-1(Rs.5200-20200)+Grade Pay Rs.2400 and PB-1(Rs.5200-20200)+Grade Pay Rs.2800 after completion of 10, 20 and 30 years of service as LDC/UDC respectively. As such, the said decision is detrimental to the interest of the cadre and discriminatory in nature.

10) That the following table shows how the benefits under MACP Scheme is less advantageous because of the fact that the MACP is granted in the hierarchy of the successive grade pay than the erstwhile ACP Scheme to the Ministerial Staff which was granted in the promotional hierarchy. An extract of the same is furnished hereunder :-

As item No.1, 3, 8, 9, 29 & 46 are similar, it was decided to club them together.

After detailed discussions on the issues, it was decided that Para 13 of MACPS shall be revised to the effect that Organizations / Cadres shall have the option to choose either the ACP Scheme or the MACP Scheme. Individual options, however, cannot be permitted.

The post Granting of Grade Pay hierarchy to UDC to the next promotional post of Assistants – Ministerial Staff Association appeared first on CENTRAL GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES NEWS.

The post MACP Anomaly : NFIR writes to Railway Board to rectify the anomaly with illustrations. appeared first on CENTRAL GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES NEWS.

Courtesy : www.govtenews.com
Source: www.indianrailways.gov.in

The post Frequently asked questions (FAQ) on MACP Scheme appeared first on CENTRAL GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES NEWS.