<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>MACP Joint Committee JULY 2012 Archives - CENTRAL GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES NEWS</title>
	<atom:link href="https://centralgovernmentnews.com/tag/macp-joint-committee-july-2012/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://centralgovernmentnews.com/tag/macp-joint-committee-july-2012/</link>
	<description>All about Central Government Employees News. Get the central govt employees latest news, DoPT Orders, 7th Pay Commission, DA Hike, latest notification for pensioners, MACP latest order, da for central government employees, and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2012 08:12:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Memorandum By IRTSA to Railway Board Regarding 3rd MACP after 20 years of First Promotion or 10 years after 2nd Promotion or 30 years of Appointment</title>
		<link>https://centralgovernmentnews.com/memorandum-by-irtsa-to-railway-board-regarding-3rd-macp-after-20-years-of-first-promotion-or-10-years-after-2nd-promotion-or-30-years-of-appointment/</link>
					<comments>https://centralgovernmentnews.com/memorandum-by-irtsa-to-railway-board-regarding-3rd-macp-after-20-years-of-first-promotion-or-10-years-after-2nd-promotion-or-30-years-of-appointment/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2012 08:12:33 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AICPIN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MACP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACP-MACP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anomalies on MACP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clarification on MACP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRTSA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MACP Joint Committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MACP Joint Committee JULY 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MACP Scheme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Railway Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Staff Side Members]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://centralgovernmentnews.com/?p=1088</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Memorandum By IRTSA to Railway Board Regarding 3rd MACP after 20 years of First Promotion or 10 years after 2nd Promotion or 30 years of Appointment INDIAN RAILWAYS TECHNICAL SUPERVISORS ASSOCIATION (Estd. 1965, Regd. No.1329. website http://www.irtsa.net) M.Shanmugam, Central President, IRTSA No.4, Sixth Street, TVS Nagar, Chennai-6000050 Harchandan Singh, General Secretary, IRTSA C.Hq.32, Phase 6, [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://centralgovernmentnews.com/memorandum-by-irtsa-to-railway-board-regarding-3rd-macp-after-20-years-of-first-promotion-or-10-years-after-2nd-promotion-or-30-years-of-appointment/">Memorandum By IRTSA to Railway Board Regarding 3rd MACP after 20 years of First Promotion or 10 years after 2nd Promotion or 30 years of Appointment</a> appeared first on <a href="https://centralgovernmentnews.com">CENTRAL GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES NEWS</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><em>Memorandum By IRTSA to Railway Board Regarding 3rd MACP after 20 years of First Promotion or 10 years after 2nd Promotion or 30 years of Appointment</em></div>
<div></div>
<div><strong>INDIAN RAILWAYS TECHNICAL SUPERVISORS ASSOCIATION</strong></div>
<div><strong>(Estd. 1965, Regd. No.1329. website http://www.irtsa.net)</strong></div>
<div></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">M.Shanmugam,</div>
<div style="text-align: center;">Central President, IRTSA</div>
<div style="text-align: center;">No.4, Sixth Street, TVS Nagar,</div>
<div style="text-align: center;">Chennai-6000050</div>
<div style="text-align: center;"></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">Harchandan Singh,</div>
<div style="text-align: center;">General Secretary, IRTSA</div>
<div style="text-align: center;">C.Hq.32, Phase 6, Mohali,</div>
<div style="text-align: center;">Chandigarh-160055</div>
<div></div>
<div style="text-align: right;">No.IRTSA/Memo/RB/</div>
<div style="text-align: right;">Date : 22.10.2012</div>
<div style="text-align: right;">MEMBER STAFF</div>
<div style="text-align: right;">RAILWAY BOARD, NEW DELHI</div>
<div></div>
<div>Respected Sir,</div>
<div></div>
<div>Sub: MACPS &#8211; Reg: <strong><em>Grant of third financial upgradation under MACPS on completion of 20 years of service from the first promotion OR 10 years after second promotion OR 30 years after regular appointment &#8211; whichever is earlier.</em></strong></div>
<div></div>
<div>Ref: 1.RBE No.101/2009, No.PC-V/2009/ACP/2, dated &#8211; 10.06.2009,</div>
<div>2.RBE No.143/2012, No.PC-V/2009/ACP/2 dated &#8211; 29.09.10</div>
<div>3. Railway Board&#8217;s letter No.PC-V/2009/ACP/2, dated &#8211; 29.12.2011</div>
<div>4.Office of CPO/ICF letter No.PB/S2/MACP, dated &#8211; 21.01.2010.</div>
<div></div>
<div>1. We bring to your kind notice the need for issuing a clarification about granting of 3rd Financial up gradation under MACP after completion of 20 years from the first promotion as per Railway Board&#8217;s orders and clarifications cited above reg: Modified Assured Career Progression Scheme (MACPS).</div>
<div></div>
<div>2.  As per Board’s letter dated &#8211; 10.06.2009 cited above vide para 28, in the illustration &#8211; a Railway servant is eligible  to get the 3rd financial up-gradation under MACPS before the completion of 30 years of service from the date of initial appointment. The illustration shows that 3rd financial upgradation under MACPS shall be granted on completion of 8+10+10 = 28 years. – Annexure – I.</div>
<div></div>
<div>3.  Again in the illustration shown in the para-5 of the same letter referred above it is stated that “Promotions earned/upgradation granted under the (old) ACP Scheme in the past to those grades which now carry the same grade pay due to merger of pay scales/upgradations of posts recommended by the Sixth Pay Commission shall be ignored for the purpose of granting upgradations under MACPS” and clearly illustrates that service rendered prior to 1.1.2006 should be counted for financial upgradation under MACPS. – Annexure – II.</div>
<div></div>
<div>4.  Clarification on grant of third financial upgradation after the completion of 30 years from the initial appointment has been issued by Railway Board by vide RBE No.143/2010,No.PC-V/2009/ACP/2, Dated 29.09.10, only to extend the financial upgradation to those employees who got two financial upgradations in 24 years, in the old ACP scheme without waiting for completion of 10 years from the date of their second financial upgradation on the old ACP scheme. This has been clarified in the point of doubt number -3 in the Railway Board’s letter. But for this clarification these employees would be eligible for their 3rd financial upgradation on completion of 34 years of service from the date of initial appointment. – Annexure – III.</div>
<div></div>
<div>5.  This principle has been emphasized in Railway Board’s letter No: No.PC-V/2009/ACP/2, dated 29.12.2011. – Annexure – IV.</div>
<div></div>
<div>6. Some Zonal Railways / Production Units &#8211;  without understanding the principle of 3 financial upgradations, which can happen well before the completion of 30 years of service from the date of initial appointment &#8211; are denying the benefit of 3rd</div>
<div>financial upgradation on completion of 20 years of service from the date of first promotion, that is, granting 2nd Financial up gradation after the completion of 10 years from the first promotion received by the employee and subsequent 3rd Financial up gradation after the completion of 10 years from the second financial upgradation received by the employee including the service rendered by them prior to 1.1.2006 in the (old) ACP scheme.</div>
<div></div>
<div>7. One example of denial of 3rd financial upgradation after the completion of 20 years of service from the date of first promotion, ignoring the service rendered prior to 1.9.2008 at Integral Coach Factory, Chennai &#8211; is attached in Annexure – V.</div>
<div></div>
<div>8. It is, therefore, requested to issue clarification to all Zonal Railways &amp; Production Units to “Grant third financial upgradation under MACPS on completion of 20 years of service from the first promotion OR 10 years after second promotion Or 30 years  after regular appointment – whichever is earlier.”</div>
<div></div>
<div style="text-align: right;">Yours’ faithfully,</div>
<div style="text-align: right;">sd/-</div>
<div style="text-align: right;">Harchandan Singh,</div>
<div style="text-align: right;">General Secretary, IRTSA</div>
<div></div>
<div><a href="http://www.irtsa.net/pdfdocs/Memo_Reg_3rd_MACP_after_20_yrs_of_First_or_10_years_after_2nd_Promotion_or_30_yrs_of_Appointment.pdf" target="_blank">Click here to continue&#8230;</a></div>
<div></div>
<div>Source : www.irtsa.net</div>
<p>The post <a href="https://centralgovernmentnews.com/memorandum-by-irtsa-to-railway-board-regarding-3rd-macp-after-20-years-of-first-promotion-or-10-years-after-2nd-promotion-or-30-years-of-appointment/">Memorandum By IRTSA to Railway Board Regarding 3rd MACP after 20 years of First Promotion or 10 years after 2nd Promotion or 30 years of Appointment</a> appeared first on <a href="https://centralgovernmentnews.com">CENTRAL GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES NEWS</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://centralgovernmentnews.com/memorandum-by-irtsa-to-railway-board-regarding-3rd-macp-after-20-years-of-first-promotion-or-10-years-after-2nd-promotion-or-30-years-of-appointment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>MACP Scheme : Pay of seniors getting lesser salary than juniors to be hiked</title>
		<link>https://centralgovernmentnews.com/macp-scheme-pay-of-seniors-getting-lesser-salary-than-juniors-to-be-hiked/</link>
					<comments>https://centralgovernmentnews.com/macp-scheme-pay-of-seniors-getting-lesser-salary-than-juniors-to-be-hiked/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2012 08:11:02 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AICPIN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MACP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACP-MACP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anomalies on MACP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clarification on MACP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FAQ on MACP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feedback of MACP meeting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MACP Joint Committee JULY 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stepping up]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://centralgovernmentnews.com/?p=1086</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>MACP Scheme : Pay of seniors getting lesser salary than juniors to be hiked Pay of seniors getting lesser salary than juniors to be hiked CENTRE’S CAREER PROGRESSION SCHEME  Pay of seniors getting lesser salary than juniors to be hiked   Tribune News Service Chandigarh, October 28  Removing certain anomalies in its career progression scheme, [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://centralgovernmentnews.com/macp-scheme-pay-of-seniors-getting-lesser-salary-than-juniors-to-be-hiked/">MACP Scheme : Pay of seniors getting lesser salary than juniors to be hiked</a> appeared first on <a href="https://centralgovernmentnews.com">CENTRAL GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES NEWS</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>MACP Scheme : Pay of seniors getting lesser salary than juniors to be hiked</strong></p>
<div><strong>Pay of seniors getting lesser salary than juniors to be hiked</strong></div>
<div></div>
<div style="text-align: center;"><strong>CENTRE’S CAREER PROGRESSION SCHEME </strong></div>
<div><strong><br />
</strong></div>
<div><strong>Pay of seniors getting lesser salary than juniors to be hiked  </strong></div>
<div><strong>Tribune News Service</strong></div>
<div></div>
<div style="text-align: right;"><strong>Chandigarh, October 28 </strong></div>
<div></div>
<div>Removing certain anomalies in its career progression scheme, the Central government has ordered stepping up of pay of employees in cases where a senior is getting lower emoluments than his junior.</div>
<div></div>
<div>The disparities had arisen between employees who came under the scheme before 2006 and those who got benefits between 2006 and 2008 consequent to the implementation of the Sixth Central Pay Commission (SPC).</div>
<div></div>
<div>Orders issued by the Department of Personnel and Training earlier this month state, “It has been decided to allow stepping up of pay in such cases where the senior, but for the pay revision on account of the SPC, would have continued to draw higher pay”.</div>
<div></div>
<div>A large number of Central government employees will be financially benefited by this order. The employees affected had taken up the matter with the government and the anomalies committee, following which the issue was examined by the Department of Expenditure.</div>
<div></div>
<div>The government’s Assured Career Progression Scheme (ACPS), which granted two financial upgrades on completion of 12 and 24 years of regular service to employees who did not get promotion in the existing grade, was applicable up till August 2008.</div>
<div></div>
<div>It was replaced in September 2008 by the Modified Career Progression Scheme. As the revised pay scales under SPC were applicable  with  effect  from  January  2006,  those employees who received benefits under ACPS between 2006 to 2008 got financial upgrade in the revised scales. Consequently, senior employees who got benefit under ACPS prior to 1996 began drawing lesser pay than their juniors.</div>
<div></div>
<div>The new order stipulates that for pay to be stepped up under the scheme, the junior and senior employee should belong to the same cadre and the posts in which they have been promoted or upgraded should  be identical. Further, the  senior employee should have been drawing equal or more pay than the junior before receiving ACPS benefits.</div>
<div></div>
<div>Source : <a href="http://www.tribuneindia.com/2012/20121029/nation.htm#13" target="_blank">www.tribuneindia.com</a></div>
<div>[http://www.tribuneindia.com/2012/20121029/nation.htm#13]</div>
<p>The post <a href="https://centralgovernmentnews.com/macp-scheme-pay-of-seniors-getting-lesser-salary-than-juniors-to-be-hiked/">MACP Scheme : Pay of seniors getting lesser salary than juniors to be hiked</a> appeared first on <a href="https://centralgovernmentnews.com">CENTRAL GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES NEWS</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://centralgovernmentnews.com/macp-scheme-pay-of-seniors-getting-lesser-salary-than-juniors-to-be-hiked/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>MACP JOINT COMMITTEE MEETING JULY 2012 &#8211; REPORT FROM CONFEDERATION GS</title>
		<link>https://centralgovernmentnews.com/macp-joint-committee-meeting-july-2012-report-from-confederation-gs/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2012 07:21:10 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Latest News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Confederation News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MACP Joint Committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MACP Joint Committee JULY 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MACP Scheme Clarification]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://centralgovernmentnews.com/?p=292</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>MACP JOINT COMMITTEE MEETING AND DECISIONS – CONFEDERATION OF CENTRAL GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES &#38; WORKERS The joint Committee set up by the National Anomaly Committee to consider the MACP related issues met on 27th July, 2012. The Staff Side was represented at the meeting by the following comrades: Com. M. Raghaviah Com. Umraomal Purohit Com. S.K. [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://centralgovernmentnews.com/macp-joint-committee-meeting-july-2012-report-from-confederation-gs/">MACP JOINT COMMITTEE MEETING JULY 2012 &#8211; REPORT FROM CONFEDERATION GS</a> appeared first on <a href="https://centralgovernmentnews.com">CENTRAL GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES NEWS</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MACP JOINT COMMITTEE MEETING AND DECISIONS – CONFEDERATION OF CENTRAL GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES &amp; WORKERS</p>
<p>The joint Committee set up by the National Anomaly Committee to consider the MACP related issues met on 27th July, 2012. The Staff Side was represented at the meeting by the following comrades:<br />
Com. M. Raghaviah<br />
Com. Umraomal Purohit<br />
Com. S.K. Vyas<br />
Com. C. Srikumar<br />
Com. K.K.N. Kutty<br />
Com. Shivgopal Misra<br />
Com. Bhosle</p>
<p>The report prepared by the sub-committee after three rounds of discussions was reviewed at the meeting. The points that came up for discussion and the decisions taken are as under:</p>
<p>Grant of MACP in the promotional hierarchy: The Staff Side pointed out that the ACP which was in vogue till the advent of MACP had been on promotional hierarchy. In the name of improvement of the scheme, the Government cannot unilaterally change it, especially when the concerned employees do not consider it as advantageous. They suggested that the employees must be allowed to retain the ACP for the first two promotions and for the third promotion MACP can be extended. However, the Official Side said that it would not be possible to have any hybrid scheme. In fact, they added that the 6th CPC had suggested for two career progressions only and that too on grade pay hierarchy. The govt. had improved upon and therefore it was not possible for them to agree for the suggestion of the Staff Side. They also stated that the reason for bringing about grade pay hierarchy was to bring about uniformity in the scheme across the Departments as the promotional hierarchy varies from one department to another. They declined to consider the suggestion for promotional hierarchy based MACP.</p>
<p>The Staff Side then pointed that in the last meeting of the Committee, the Official Side taking into account the difficulties and disadvantages experienced by the employees in many departments which were presented by the Staff Side had agreed to consider department wise/cadre wise options. The Staff Side further pointed out that the suggestion of the Official Side would not go to resolve the issue. They said that option must be provide for each individual employee to choose either the ACP or MACP whichever is beneficial to him as is provided in the CCS(RP) Rules. The unilateral withdrawal of a benefit from an employee is not permissible. They also stated that the Official Side has not pointed out the difficulties in agreeing to this proposal. After some discussions, the Official Side said that they would re-examine the issue of individual option and will come up with their considered view at the next meeting of the NAC.</p>
<p>Counting 50% of service of the Temporary status/casual labourers for the purpose of MACP: In the light of the discussion at the meeting, the Official Side agreed to examine the matter.</p>
<p>Treatment of employees selected under LDCE Scheme and GDCE Scheme: The Official Side agreed to issue orders on the same lines as has been issued under the ACP Scheme. The Staff Side stated that wherever examination is the criterion for promotion/fast track promotion, the service rendered by such employees in the lower post must be ignored and such promotion should be treated as appointment and the promotion scheme to commence from the date of such appointment. This was not agreed to by the official side on the plea that such appointments are against promotion quota and therefore, they are to be considered as promotion only. The Staff Side them pointed out that this issue had been the subject matter of judicial consideration before the Tribunal and the Tribunal has given the decision in favour of the employees. The Official Side wanted a copy of the judgement to react to this.</p>
<p>Date of effect of the Scheme: The Staff Side pointed out that the date of effect of MACP Scheme must be from 1.1.2006. The analogy of the 5th CPC has no application as ACP was introduced after discussion with the Staff Side on a later date. Since the Government issued the orders of the 6th CPC and the acceptance of the MACP with modification almost simultaneously, it should have been made effective from 1.1.2006. They also pointed out that the MACP is not an allowance to be made application from 1.9.2008. The Official Side pointed out that the benefit emanating from the MACP i.e. the third promotion was applicable to all existing employees who were in service after 1.9.2008. The Staff Side demanded that the benefit has been denied to those who retired between 1.1.2006 and 30.8.2008. The Official Side agreed to consider application of the new MACP with effect from 1.1.2006 for those who retired/died between 1.1.2006 and 30.8.2008.</p>
<p>Financial up-gradation under MACP in the case of staff who join another unit/organization on request. It was agreed at the last meeting that the services rendered in another recruiting unit/organization will be taken into account for counting service for promotion under MACP. The Staff Side however, pointed out that in many cases, the employees are compelled to seek reversion in order to be transferred to another recruiting unit. In their case, the promotion so earned at the present recruiting unit and which have been foregone is being counted as one promotion under MACP. The Official Side agreed to look into this matter and issue necessary clarificatory orders.</p>
<p>Stepping up of pay of senior incumbent with the junior as a consequence of ACP/MACP. The Official Side stated that in the light of the judgments delivered in the matter they will have the case looked into and necessary instructions issued. They also stated that certain instructions in the matter has already been issued, copy of which will be made available to the Staff Side.</p>
<p>The bench mark question for promotion under MACP. The Official Side agreed to issue a clarificatory order stating that if the promotion is on seniority cum fitness basis, MACP will also be on seniority cum fitness basis.</p>
<p>There had been no discussions on other points incorporated in the report. The stand taken by the Official side in those matters remains unchanged. You may kindly access the report from the website of the Department of Personnel along with the relevant orders.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;">With greetings,</p>
<p style="text-align: right;">Yours fraternally,<br />
K.K.N. Kutty<br />
Secretary General</p>
<p>Source: www.confederationhq.blogspot.com</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://centralgovernmentnews.com/macp-joint-committee-meeting-july-2012-report-from-confederation-gs/">MACP JOINT COMMITTEE MEETING JULY 2012 &#8211; REPORT FROM CONFEDERATION GS</a> appeared first on <a href="https://centralgovernmentnews.com">CENTRAL GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES NEWS</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
