<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>7th CPC annual increment Archives - CENTRAL GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES NEWS</title>
	<atom:link href="https://centralgovernmentnews.com/tag/7th-cpc-annual-increment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://centralgovernmentnews.com/tag/7th-cpc-annual-increment/</link>
	<description>All about Central Government Employees News. Get the central govt employees latest news, DoPT Orders, 7th Pay Commission, DA Hike, latest notification for pensioners, MACP latest order, da for central government employees, and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2017 10:56:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Loss in increment in 7th CPC Pay Matrix &#8211; Demand of 3% Increment at all stages: Agenda Items for NAC Meeting</title>
		<link>https://centralgovernmentnews.com/loss-in-increment-in-7th-cpc-pay-matrix-demand-of-3-increment-at-all-stages-agenda-items-for-nac-meeting/</link>
					<comments>https://centralgovernmentnews.com/loss-in-increment-in-7th-cpc-pay-matrix-demand-of-3-increment-at-all-stages-agenda-items-for-nac-meeting/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2017 10:56:15 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[7CPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[7th CPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[7th CPC annual increment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[7th CPC Increment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[7th CPC Pay Matrix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NAC Meeting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pay matrix]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://centralgovernmentnews.com/?p=19091</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Loss in increment in 7th CPC Pay Matrix &#8211; Demand of 3% Increment at all stages: Agenda Items for NAC Meeting Item No:2 3% Increment at all stages In Para 5.1.21, the Commission has stated that it has constructed the Pay Matrix, which has two dimensions i.e. horizontal and vertical ranges. The vertical range is [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://centralgovernmentnews.com/loss-in-increment-in-7th-cpc-pay-matrix-demand-of-3-increment-at-all-stages-agenda-items-for-nac-meeting/">Loss in increment in 7th CPC Pay Matrix &#8211; Demand of 3% Increment at all stages: Agenda Items for NAC Meeting</a> appeared first on <a href="https://centralgovernmentnews.com">CENTRAL GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES NEWS</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Loss in increment in 7th CPC Pay Matrix &#8211; Demand of 3% Increment at all stages: Agenda Items for NAC Meeting</strong></p>
<p>Item No:2</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>3% Increment at all stages</strong></p></blockquote>
<p>In Para 5.1.21, the Commission has stated that it has constructed the Pay Matrix, which has two dimensions i.e. horizontal and vertical ranges. The vertical range is supposed to denote the pay progression with the level. The steps are to reflect the annual forward progression of three per cent in each level. More specifically under the Caption &#8220;Annual increment&#8221; in Para 5.1.38, the Commission has emphatically stated that the annual increment is being retained at 3 percent.</p>
<p>In the forward to the report, the Chairman Justice Shri AK Mathur (Para 1.19) writes &#8220;the prevailing rate of increment is considered quite satisfactory and has been retained&#8221;. This apart in para 4.1.17, the Commission states that the various stages within a level moves upward @ 3% p.a.</p>
<p>Having stated categorically that a Govt servant must get his annual increment @3% of his pay, the recommendation that one’s pay on award of annual increment must move to the next cell in the matrix would become tenable only if the difference between the two cells is more than 3% of the Pay of the Govt servant.</p>
<p>From the chart annexed it could be seen that it is not so at many stages warranting a revision of the Pay Matrix at those level, where the employee gets less than 3% as has annual increment when he moves on to the next higher stage in the matrix.</p>
<p>ILLUSTRATION -I &#8211; LOSS IN INCREMENT</p>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="5">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top">Pay Level</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">Sl.No. in the Pay Level (Cell)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">Basic Pay in the Revised Pay Scale</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">Next above Basic Pay after adding 3% increment</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">Next above Basic Pay fixed as per pay matrix</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">Amount of loss to the employee</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">Actual increment rate %age</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">1</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">12</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">24900</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">25647</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">25600</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">47</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2.81</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">1</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">26</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">37600</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">38728</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">38700</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">28</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2.92</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">3</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">9</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">27600</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">28428</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">28400</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">28</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2.89</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">3</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">16</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">34000</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">35020</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">35000</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">20</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2.94</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">4</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">11</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">34300</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">35329</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">35300</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">29</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2.91</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">4</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">22</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">47500</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">48925</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">48900</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">25</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2.94</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">5</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">10</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">38100</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">39243</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">39200</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">43</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2.88</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">5</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">20</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">51100</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">52633</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">52600</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">33</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2.93</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">6</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">6</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">41100</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">42333</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">42300</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">33</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2.91</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">6</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">9</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">44900</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">46247</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">46200</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">47</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2.89</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>The post <a href="https://centralgovernmentnews.com/loss-in-increment-in-7th-cpc-pay-matrix-demand-of-3-increment-at-all-stages-agenda-items-for-nac-meeting/">Loss in increment in 7th CPC Pay Matrix &#8211; Demand of 3% Increment at all stages: Agenda Items for NAC Meeting</a> appeared first on <a href="https://centralgovernmentnews.com">CENTRAL GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES NEWS</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://centralgovernmentnews.com/loss-in-increment-in-7th-cpc-pay-matrix-demand-of-3-increment-at-all-stages-agenda-items-for-nac-meeting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Anomaly in Pay Matrix levels of 7th CPC</title>
		<link>https://centralgovernmentnews.com/anomaly-in-pay-matrix-levels-of-7th-cpc/</link>
					<comments>https://centralgovernmentnews.com/anomaly-in-pay-matrix-levels-of-7th-cpc/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Aug 2017 07:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[7CPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[7th CPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[7th CPC annual increment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[7th CPC Increment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[7th CPC Pay Matrix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NFIR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pay Matrix levels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Railway Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Railways]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://centralgovernmentnews.com/?p=18921</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Anomaly in Pay Matrix levels of 7th CPC NFIR National Federation of Indian Railwaymen 3, CHELMSFORD ROAD, NEW DELHI &#8211; 110 055 No.IV/NAC/7th CPC/2016 Dated:10/08/2017 The Secretary (E), Railway Board, New Delhi Dear Sir, Sub: Anomaly in Pay Matrix levels of 7th CPC. NFIR brings to the kind notice of Railway Board the anomaly arisen [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://centralgovernmentnews.com/anomaly-in-pay-matrix-levels-of-7th-cpc/">Anomaly in Pay Matrix levels of 7th CPC</a> appeared first on <a href="https://centralgovernmentnews.com">CENTRAL GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES NEWS</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Anomaly in Pay Matrix levels of 7th CPC</strong></p>
<p align="center">NFIR<br />
National Federation of Indian Railwaymen<br />
3, CHELMSFORD ROAD, NEW DELHI &#8211; 110 055</p>
<p align="right">No.IV/NAC/7th CPC/2016<br />
Dated:10/08/2017</p>
<p>The Secretary (E), Railway Board, New Delhi</p>
<p>Dear Sir,</p>
<p>Sub: <strong>Anomaly in Pay Matrix levels of 7th CPC. </strong></p>
<p>NFIR brings to the kind notice of Railway Board the anomaly arisen due to non-grant of 3% of pay towards annual increment, pursuant to implementation of 7th CPC pay matrix levels as explained below:-</p>
<p>(a) Clause (c) of terms of reference of the National Anomaly Committee says that the Official Side and Staff Side are of the opinion that any recommendation is in contravention of the principle or the policy enunciated by the 7th CPC itself without the commission assigning any reason, constitutes an anomaly.</p>
<p>(b) The recommendations of 7th CPC regarding Annual Increment are as follows:</p>
<p>(i) 7th CPC Report &#8211; Highlights of recommendations-</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>Annual Increment- The rate of annual increment is being retained at 3%.</strong></p></blockquote>
<p>(ii) 7th CPC Report Forward:-</p>
<p>Para 1.19- The prevailing rate of increment is considered satisfactory and has been retained.</p>
<p>(iii) 7th CPC Report &#8211; Chapter 4.1-Principles of pay determination &#8211;</p>
<p>Para-4.1.17 -The various stages within a pay level moves upwards at the rate of 3% per annum.</p>
<p>(iv) 7th CPC Report -Chapter -5.1 -Pay structure (Civilian employees)</p>
<p>Para 5.1.38-Annual Increment.</p>
<p>&#8220;The rate of annual increment is being retained at 3%&#8221; Para 5.1.21-The vertical range of each level denotes pay progress within that level. That indicates steps of annual financial progression of 3% within each level.</p>
<p>However, contrary to the above principle laid down by 7th CPC, the actual increment rate in the following pay level of the pay matrix are less than 3% as illustrated in the following table.</p>
<table border="1">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="7%">S.No</td>
<td valign="top" width="13%">Pay level in The pay<br />
level (Cell)</td>
<td valign="top" width="14%">Basic pay in the revised scale</td>
<td valign="top" width="18%">Next above basic pay after adding 3% increment</td>
<td valign="top" width="19%">Next above basic pay after fixed as<br />
per pay matrix</td>
<td valign="top" width="13%">Amount of loss to the<br />
employee</td>
<td valign="top" width="12%">Actual increment rate 3%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="7%">1</td>
<td valign="top" width="13%">12</td>
<td valign="top" width="14%">24900</td>
<td valign="top" width="18%">25647</td>
<td valign="top" width="19%">25600 (Cell 13)</td>
<td valign="top" width="13%">47</td>
<td valign="top" width="12%">2.81</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="7%">2</td>
<td valign="top" width="13%">2</td>
<td valign="top" width="14%">20500</td>
<td valign="top" width="18%">21115</td>
<td valign="top" width="19%">21100 (Cell 3)</td>
<td valign="top" width="13%">15</td>
<td valign="top" width="12%">2.92</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="7%">3</td>
<td valign="top" width="13%">9</td>
<td valign="top" width="14%">27600</td>
<td valign="top" width="18%">28428</td>
<td valign="top" width="19%">28400 (Cell 10)</td>
<td valign="top" width="13%">28</td>
<td valign="top" width="12%">2.89</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="7%">4</td>
<td valign="top" width="13%">11</td>
<td valign="top" width="14%">34300</td>
<td valign="top" width="18%">35329</td>
<td valign="top" width="19%">35300 (Cell 12)</td>
<td valign="top" width="13%">29</td>
<td valign="top" width="12%">2.91</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="7%">5</td>
<td valign="top" width="13%">10</td>
<td valign="top" width="14%">38100</td>
<td valign="top" width="18%">39243</td>
<td valign="top" width="19%">39200 (Cell 11)</td>
<td valign="top" width="13%">43</td>
<td valign="top" width="12%">2.88</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="7%">6</td>
<td valign="top" width="13%">9</td>
<td valign="top" width="14%">44900</td>
<td valign="top" width="18%">46247</td>
<td valign="top" width="19%">46200 (Cell 10)</td>
<td valign="top" width="13%">47</td>
<td valign="top" width="12%">2.89</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="7%">7</td>
<td valign="top" width="13%">13</td>
<td valign="top" width="14%">64100</td>
<td valign="top" width="18%">66023</td>
<td valign="top" width="19%">66000 (Cell 14)</td>
<td valign="top" width="13%">23</td>
<td valign="top" width="12%">2.96</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="7%">8</td>
<td valign="top" width="13%">9</td>
<td valign="top" width="14%">60400</td>
<td valign="top" width="18%">62212</td>
<td valign="top" width="19%">62200 (Cell 10)</td>
<td valign="top" width="13%">12</td>
<td valign="top" width="12%">2.98</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="7%">9</td>
<td valign="top" width="13%">18</td>
<td valign="top" width="14%">87700</td>
<td valign="top" width="18%">90331</td>
<td valign="top" width="19%">90300</td>
<td valign="top" width="13%">31</td>
<td valign="top" width="12%">2.96</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><img decoding="async" title="7th-cpc-increment-rate-anomaly" src="https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-fkHSZ17cgL0/WZESvF71YaI/AAAAAAAACKs/hVuNoDs95TQl2F5XtuaqF6BcJvdvhn67wCLcBGAs/s1600/7th-cpc-increment-rate-anomaly.jpg" alt="7th-cpc-increment-rate-anomaly" width="100%" border="0" /></div>
<p>(d) From the above table it can be concluded that:</p>
<p>1. The recommendations of 7th CPC regarding increment rate is in contravention of the principle or policy enunciated by 7th CPC, hence it constitutes an anomaly .</p>
<p>2. In many stages even though the increment rate shown is 3%, it is rounded off to next below amount causing financial loss to the employees.</p>
<p>3. In the 6th CPC, while calculating increment, if the last digit as one or above, it used to be rounded off to next 10. So in this pay matrix, if the amount is 10 and above, it should be rounded off to next 100.</p>
<p>NFIR therefore requests the Railway Board to take necessary action for rectification of anomaly so as to ensure that the increment @ 3% of pay is granted to employees in whose cases where the actual amount is less than 3%.</p>
<p align="right">Yours faithfully,<br />
(Dr M. Raghavaiah)<br />
General Secretary</p>
<p>Source &#8211; <a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B40Q65NF2_7USjBQLTNhWlVIV3M/view" target="_blank">NFIR</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://centralgovernmentnews.com/anomaly-in-pay-matrix-levels-of-7th-cpc/">Anomaly in Pay Matrix levels of 7th CPC</a> appeared first on <a href="https://centralgovernmentnews.com">CENTRAL GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES NEWS</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://centralgovernmentnews.com/anomaly-in-pay-matrix-levels-of-7th-cpc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>7th Central Pay Commission retains rate of annual increment at 3%</title>
		<link>https://centralgovernmentnews.com/7th-central-pay-commission-retains-rate-of-annual-increment-at-3/</link>
					<comments>https://centralgovernmentnews.com/7th-central-pay-commission-retains-rate-of-annual-increment-at-3/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Apr 2017 06:12:12 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[7CPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[7th Central Pay Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[7th CPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[7th CPC annual increment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Central Government Employees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MACP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Promotion]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://centralgovernmentnews.com/?p=17453</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>7th Central Pay Commission retains rate of annual increment at 3% The 7th Central Pay Commission has retained the rate of annual increment at 3 per cent. The 7th CPC has also recommended withholding of annual increments in the case of those employees who are not able to meet the benchmark either for MACP or [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://centralgovernmentnews.com/7th-central-pay-commission-retains-rate-of-annual-increment-at-3/">7th Central Pay Commission retains rate of annual increment at 3%</a> appeared first on <a href="https://centralgovernmentnews.com">CENTRAL GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES NEWS</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>7th Central Pay Commission retains rate of annual increment at 3%</strong></p>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><img decoding="async" title="7thpaycommission-breaking-news" src="https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-4jPX9P4r4EY/WOD848YyZkI/AAAAAAAAByU/nP2T7ouMSmEdhkLDMTVzKyJzeZCA76zAgCLcB/s1600/7thpaycommission-breaking-news.png" alt="7thpaycommission-breaking-news" border="0" /></div>
<p>The 7th Central Pay Commission has retained the rate of annual increment at 3 per cent. The 7th CPC has also recommended withholding of annual increments in the case of those employees who are not able to meet the benchmark either for MACP or a regular promotion within the first 20 years of their service.</p>
<p>The 7th Central Pay Commission has retained the rate of annual increment at 3 per cent. The 7th CPC has also recommended withholding of annual increments in the case of those employees who are not able to meet the benchmark either for MACP or a regular promotion within the first 20 years of their service. These recommendations have been accepted by the government.</p>
<p>The 7th CPC has observed that it is essential to have a linkage between Departmental Results Framework Documents (RFD) and Annual Appraisal Performance Report (APAR), and has suggested the following modifications in the existing APAR system for determining Performance Related Pay:</p>
<p>(i) <strong>Alignment of Objectives:</strong> The Ministry’s Vision/Mission needs to be translated into a set of strategic objectives for each department and these objectives need to be cascaded by the Department Head to his subordinates and subsequently down the chain.<br />
(ii) <strong>Prioritizing Objectives, Assigning Success Indicators and their Weights:</strong> Objectives reflected in the APAR should be prioritized and assigned weights along with success indictors or Key Performance Indicators. The Commission recommended 60 percent weight on work output and 40 percent weight on personal attributes, instead of the existing 60 percent weight on personal attributes and only 40 percent weight to work output.</p>
<p>(iii) <strong>No Ex-ante Agreement:</strong> The indicators in the APAR of an officer/staff will need to be discussed and set with the supervisor at the beginning of the year.</p>
<p>(iv) Timelines: The timelines for RFD may be synchronized with the preparation of the APAR so that the targets set under RFD get reflected in individual APARs in a seamless manner.</p>
<p>(v) <strong>Online APAR System:</strong> The Commission recommended introduction of online APARs system for all Central Government officers/employees.</p>
<p>This was stated by Arjun Ram Meghwal, Minister of State in the Ministry of Finance, in a written reply to a question in Lok Sabha today.</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.financialexpress.com/money/7th-central-pay-commission-retains-rate-of-annual-increment-at-3/610217/" target="_blank">financialexpress</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://centralgovernmentnews.com/7th-central-pay-commission-retains-rate-of-annual-increment-at-3/">7th Central Pay Commission retains rate of annual increment at 3%</a> appeared first on <a href="https://centralgovernmentnews.com">CENTRAL GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES NEWS</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://centralgovernmentnews.com/7th-central-pay-commission-retains-rate-of-annual-increment-at-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
