<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>6th CPC anomalies Archives - CENTRAL GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES NEWS</title>
	<atom:link href="https://centralgovernmentnews.com/tag/6th-cpc-anomalies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://centralgovernmentnews.com/tag/6th-cpc-anomalies/</link>
	<description>All about Central Government Employees News. Get the central govt employees latest news, DoPT Orders, 7th Pay Commission, DA Hike, latest notification for pensioners, MACP latest order, da for central government employees, and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2018 09:19:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>6th CPC Entry Pay Structure for Direct Recruits</title>
		<link>https://centralgovernmentnews.com/6th-cpc-entry-pay-structure-for-direct-recruits/</link>
					<comments>https://centralgovernmentnews.com/6th-cpc-entry-pay-structure-for-direct-recruits/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2018 09:19:09 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[6CPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[6th CPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[6th CPC anomalies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[6th CPC Entry Pay Structure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[6th CPC Option]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CCS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CCS(RP)Rules]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entry Pay for Direct Recruits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Re-fixation of pay]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://centralgovernmentnews.com/?p=22506</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>6th CPC Entry Pay Structure for Direct Recruits Entry Pay in the Revised Pay Structure for Direct Recruits Appointed on or After 1.1.2006 CCS (RP) Rules, 2008 &#8211; Section II of the Part &#8216;A&#8217; of the First Schedule Pay Band 1 Rs. 5200-20200 Grade Pay Pay in the Pay Band Basic Pay 1800 5200 7000 [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://centralgovernmentnews.com/6th-cpc-entry-pay-structure-for-direct-recruits/">6th CPC Entry Pay Structure for Direct Recruits</a> appeared first on <a href="https://centralgovernmentnews.com">CENTRAL GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES NEWS</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3>6th CPC Entry Pay Structure for Direct Recruits</h3>
<h3>Entry Pay in the Revised Pay Structure for Direct Recruits Appointed on or After 1.1.2006</h3>
<p><em>CCS (RP) Rules, 2008 &#8211; Section II of the Part &#8216;A&#8217; of the First Schedule</em></p>
<p><strong>Pay Band 1 Rs. 5200-20200</strong></p>
<table border="1" width="100%" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" align="center">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td bgcolor="#FFE7B3"><strong>Grade Pay</strong></td>
<td bgcolor="#FFE7B3"><strong>Pay in the Pay Band</strong></td>
<td bgcolor="#FFE7B3"><strong>Basic Pay</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>1800</strong></td>
<td>5200</td>
<td>7000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>1900</strong></td>
<td>5830</td>
<td>7730</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>2000</strong></td>
<td>7510</td>
<td>9910</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>2800</strong></td>
<td>8560</td>
<td>11360</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><strong>Pay Band 2 (Rs. 9300-34800)</strong></p>
<table border="1" width="100%" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" align="center">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td bgcolor="#FFE7B3"><strong>Grade Pay</strong></td>
<td bgcolor="#FFE7B3"><strong>Pay in the Pay Band</strong></td>
<td bgcolor="#FFE7B3"><strong>Basic Pay</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>4200</strong></td>
<td>9,300</td>
<td>3,500</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>4600</strong></td>
<td>12,540</td>
<td>17,140</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>4800</strong></td>
<td>13,350</td>
<td>18,150</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><strong>Pay Band 3 Rs. Rs.15 600-39100)</strong></p>
<table border="1" width="100%" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" align="center">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td bgcolor="#FFE7B3"><strong>Grade Pay</strong></td>
<td bgcolor="#FFE7B3"><strong>Pay in the Pay Band</strong></td>
<td bgcolor="#FFE7B3"><strong>Basic Pay</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>5400</strong></td>
<td>15,600</td>
<td>21,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>6600</strong></td>
<td>18,750</td>
<td>25,350</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>7600</strong></td>
<td>21,900</td>
<td>29,500</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><strong>Pay Band 4 (Rs. 37,400-67,000)</strong></p>
<table border="1" width="100%" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" align="center">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td bgcolor="#FFE7B3"><strong>Grade Pay</strong></td>
<td bgcolor="#FFE7B3"><strong>Pay in the Pay Band</strong></td>
<td bgcolor="#FFE7B3"><strong>Basic Pay</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>8700</strong></td>
<td>37,400</td>
<td>46,100</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>8900</strong></td>
<td>40,200</td>
<td>49,100</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>10000</strong></td>
<td>43,000</td>
<td>53,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>12000</strong></td>
<td>47,100</td>
<td>59,100</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>The post <a href="https://centralgovernmentnews.com/6th-cpc-entry-pay-structure-for-direct-recruits/">6th CPC Entry Pay Structure for Direct Recruits</a> appeared first on <a href="https://centralgovernmentnews.com">CENTRAL GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES NEWS</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://centralgovernmentnews.com/6th-cpc-entry-pay-structure-for-direct-recruits/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Proposal of the Staff Side to record disagreement of unsettled 6th CPC anomalies and to refer the same to Arbitrator Comments</title>
		<link>https://centralgovernmentnews.com/proposal-of-the-staff-side-to-record-disagreement-of-unsettled-6th-cpc-anomalies-and-to-refer-the-same-to-arbitrator-comments/</link>
					<comments>https://centralgovernmentnews.com/proposal-of-the-staff-side-to-record-disagreement-of-unsettled-6th-cpc-anomalies-and-to-refer-the-same-to-arbitrator-comments/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2018 16:43:55 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[6CPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[6th CPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[6th CPC anomalies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Confederation News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MACP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MACP Upgradation]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://centralgovernmentnews.com/?p=21503</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Proposal of the Staff Side to record disagreement of unsettled 6th CPC anomalies and to refer the same to Arbitrator Comments No.35014/1/2014-Estt.D Government of India Ministry of Personnel P.G. &#38; Pensions Department of Personnel &#38; Training North Block, New Dlehi Dated: 02.02.2018 Office Memorandum Sub: Proposal of the Staff Side to record disagreement of unsettled [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://centralgovernmentnews.com/proposal-of-the-staff-side-to-record-disagreement-of-unsettled-6th-cpc-anomalies-and-to-refer-the-same-to-arbitrator-comments/">Proposal of the Staff Side to record disagreement of unsettled 6th CPC anomalies and to refer the same to Arbitrator Comments</a> appeared first on <a href="https://centralgovernmentnews.com">CENTRAL GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES NEWS</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Proposal of the Staff Side to record disagreement of unsettled 6th CPC anomalies and to refer the same to Arbitrator Comments</strong></p>
<p align="center">No.35014/1/2014-Estt.D</p>
<p>Government of India<br />
Ministry of Personnel P.G. &amp; Pensions<br />
Department of Personnel &amp; Training</p>
<p align="right">North Block, New Dlehi<br />
Dated: 02.02.2018</p>
<p align="center"><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Office Memorandum</span></p>
<p>Sub: <strong>Proposal of the Staff Side to record disagreement of unsettled 6th CPC anomalies and to refer the same to Arbitrator Comments, regarding</strong></p>
<p>The undersigned is directed to refer to JCA Section’s OM No. 11/1/2015-JCA dated 29.11.2017 and OM No. 3/3/2016-JCA dated 18.01.2018 on the above mentioned subject. With regard to request of JCA Section to discuss the issue with Staff Side. It is stated that it is not known on which issue Staff-Side desires to discuss the issue. Since the MACP Scheme is very complex, it would be appropriate that the matter may be discussed in the JCM meeting itself. However, latest status on the issue raised by Staff Side in the Standing Committee meeting held on 27.07.2012, 25.10.2016 and 03.05.2017 are furnished as under:-</p>
<p><strong>FOLLOW UP ACTION AND LATEST STATUS ON THE ISSUES DISCUSSED IN THE JOINT COMMITTEE MEETING ON MACP HELD ON 27.07.2012</strong></p>
<table border="1" width="100%" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top"><strong>S.No.</strong></td>
<td valign="top"><strong>Item</strong></td>
<td valign="top"><strong>Recommendations</strong></td>
<td valign="top"><strong>Follow up action</strong></td>
<td valign="top"><strong>Latest Status</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">1.</td>
<td valign="top">Grant of MACP in the promotional hierachy</td>
<td valign="top">Staff side was informed that it was not possible to<br />
agree to the demand. Demand for allowing individual option for either ACPS or<br />
MACPS was also not agreed to.</td>
<td valign="top">No, action is required</td>
<td valign="top">Matter is sub-judice before Hon&#8217;ble Supreme Court.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">2.</td>
<td valign="top">Date of effect of MACP Scheme</td>
<td valign="top">Staff side was advised to reconsider their demand<br />
for making MACPS effective from 01.01.2006.</td>
<td valign="top">No action.</td>
<td valign="top">No action</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">3.</td>
<td valign="top">Counting of 50% of service rendered by Temporary<br />
Status Casual Labour for reckoning 10/20/30 years under MACP Scheme that<br />
post.</td>
<td valign="top">It was decided that this issue may be taken up by<br />
the staff side in the National Council separately.</td>
<td valign="top">No action is required</td>
<td valign="top"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">8.</td>
<td valign="top">Stepping up of pay of senior incumbents at par with<br />
junior incumbents as a consequence of ACP/MACPS.</td>
<td valign="top">Official side states that steeping up of pay in the<br />
pay band or grade pay w.r.to junior getting more pay than the senior on<br />
account of pay fixation under the MACP Scheme can be considered as a special<br />
dispensation and suitable clarificatory instructions will be considered.</td>
<td valign="top">1. Instructions in this regard have been issued vide OM dated<br />
04.10.2012.<br />
2. On a reference from Ministry of Railways, the issue was<br />
considered, wherein it was categorically stated that the anomaly in Accounts Cadre of Railways cannot be<br />
attributed to ACP/MACP Schemes, but due to facility cadre structure.</td>
<td valign="top">7th CPC has recommended in Para 11.40.81<br />
for stepping up of pay in circumstantial ground prevalent in M/o Railways.<br />
On the proposal of M/o Railways for accepting this<br />
recommendation of 7th CPC, file has been referred to D/o<br />
Expenditure for approval</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">9.</td>
<td valign="top">Benchmark for MACP</td>
<td valign="top">Suitable instructions to be issued that wherever<br />
promotions are given on non selection basis (seniority- cum-fitness) the<br />
prescribed benchmark as mentioned in para 17 of Annexure 1 of MACPS dated<br />
19.05.2009 will not be applicable and the benchmark for promotion will apply<br />
for the purpose of MACPS.</td>
<td valign="top">Instructions in this regard have been issued vide OM<br />
dated 04.12.2012</td>
<td valign="top">As per recommendations of 7th CPC, Benchmark<br />
for MACP has been enhanced to Very Good for all the posts vide OM dated<br />
28.09.2016</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">10.</td>
<td valign="top">Grant of ACP benefit to Artisan Staff of Ministry of<br />
Defence.</td>
<td valign="top">Official side informed that the matter has already<br />
been examined and it is not amenable so acceptance.</td>
<td valign="top">The matter has been again examined on a reference<br />
from M/o Defence.</td>
<td valign="top">The matter has been closed in the meeting of<br />
Standing Committee held on 03.05.2017.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">11.</td>
<td valign="top">Issues already resolved and hence closed</td>
<td valign="top">Multiple issues</td>
<td valign="top">Closed.</td>
<td valign="top">No action.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">12.</td>
<td valign="top">Employees who got one promotion prior to 01.09.2008<br />
and completed over two decades of service without benefit of promotion and are<br />
denied third MACPs.</td>
<td valign="top">Official side has stated that this is a peculiar<br />
situtation and agreed to consider this issue on the basis of a reference to<br />
be made by the Ministry of Railways.</td>
<td valign="top">On a reference from M/o Railways the issue was<br />
examined in consultation with the D/o Expenditure and the proposal was not<br />
agreed to.</td>
<td valign="top">No action.</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Follow up action on the meeting of Standing Committee held on 25.10.2016 under the Chairmanship of Secretary (P) on the issues relating to MACPS</p>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top"><strong>S.No.</strong></td>
<td valign="top"><strong>Item</strong></td>
<td valign="top"><strong>Recommendations</strong></td>
<td valign="top"><strong>Follow up action</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">5(xii)</td>
<td valign="top">Ensuring Five Promotions in the Service Career and Grant of MACP in the promotional hierarchy.</td>
<td valign="top">It was observed by Secretary (P) that the reason behind delay in promotion was also due to delay in completion and implementation of cadre review report and instructions would be issued to speed up cadre review.</td>
<td valign="top">Action required from CRD Division. With regard to other demand i.e. grant of MACP in<br />
promotional hierachy, it is stated that if MACP will be granted in the promotional hierarchy, it will give rise to uneven benefit to employees falling in the same pay scale since several organizations adopted different hierarchical pattern. Consequently employees working in organizations having  greater number of intermediate greater number of intermediate grades will suffer because financial upgradation under MACPS will place them in lower pay scale vis-à-vis similarly placed employees in another organization that had lesser intermediary grades.Further, 7th CPC has also recommended that MACP will continue to be administered in the hierarchy of level in the<br />
Pay Matrix</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">6(vii)</td>
<td valign="top">Grant of 3rd MACP in GP Rs. 4600/- to the<br />
Master Craftsman (MCM) of Defence Ministry who were holding the post of MCM in the pre-revised pay scale of Rs. 4500-7000/- as on 31.12.2005.</td>
<td valign="top">Joint Secretary (Estt.). DoP&amp;T informed that the issued would be re-examined.</td>
<td valign="top">Formal proposal of M/o Defence has been received. The<br />
matter was discussed with the representatives of M/o Defence twice i.e. on 19.01.2016 and 26.01.2016. The issue will be referred to D/o Expenditure for<br />
reconsideration of their earlier advice.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">6(xiii)</td>
<td valign="top">Withdraw the stringent conditions unilaterally imposed by Government for grant of Modified Assured Career Progression (MACP) in promotion and grant MACP on promotional.</td>
<td valign="top">Staff Side demand that Government should either make MACP promotional hierarchy centric or they should not make it conditional..Joint Secretary (Estt.). DoP&amp;T explained that the principle stil remains the same as for promotion also, the benchmark is &#8220;Very Good&#8221;.</td>
<td valign="top">No action is required.</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Follow up action on the meeting of Standing Committee held on 03.05.2017 under the Chairmanship of Secretary (P) on the issues relating to MACPS</p>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top"><strong>S.No.</strong></td>
<td valign="top"><strong>Item</strong></td>
<td valign="top"><strong>Recommendations</strong></td>
<td valign="top"><strong>Comments of Establishment Division</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">12.</td>
<td valign="top">Ensuring Five promotions in the Service Career</td>
<td valign="top">It was informed that when this anomaly was earlier pointed out to the Joint Committee it was promised that this would be<br />
reconsidered and rectified. They suggested that if the MACP scheme was considered more beneficial the employee should be given option to choose<br />
whether be wants ACP Scheme of MACP scheme. The Chairman desired to know if there was any pay commission recommendation on this issue, on which he was informed that there was not.<br />
It was decided that the Establishment Division would<br />
examine the issue further.</td>
<td valign="top">It is stated that if MACP will be granted in the<br />
promotional hierarchy it will give rise to uneven benefit to employees<br />
falling in the same pay scale since several organizations adopted different hierarchical pattern. Consequently employees working in organizations having greater number of intermediate grades will suffer because financial<br />
upgradation under MACPS will place them in lower pay scale vis-à-vis<br />
similarly placed employees in another organization that had lesser intermediary grades.<br />
Further, 7th CPC has also recommended that MACP will continue to be administered in the hierarchy of levels in the<br />
Pay Matrix.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">19.</td>
<td valign="top">Grant of 3rd MACP in GP Rs. 4600 to the<br />
Master Craftsmen (MCM) of Defence Ministry who were holding the post of MCM in the pre-revised pay scale of Rs. 4500-7000 as on 31/12/2005</td>
<td valign="top">Establishment Division had through their letter<br />
dated 09.02.2017 informed that a formal proposal of M/o Defence had been received. The matter was discussed with the representatives of M/o Defence twice i.e. on 19.01.2016, and 26.01.2016. The issue will be referred to D/o Expenditure for reconsideration of their earlier advice.<br />
The Staff-Side expressed satisfaction with the action taken. It was decided that the item may be closed.</td>
<td valign="top">No action.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">25</td>
<td valign="top">Withdraw the stringent conditions unilaterally<br />
imposed by Government on grant of Modified Career Progression (MACP) in promotions and grant of MACP on promotional hierarchy.</td>
<td valign="top">JS (Admn and JCA) informed that ever since the<br />
introduction of disclosure of APARs, the number of employees getting higher<br />
level of gradings may rise. Proposal needed to be evidence based. It was<br />
decided that the Ministry of Railways may provide data on the trend of recorded gradings of APARS.</td>
<td valign="top">Though the matter assigned to M/o Railways, however, it is stated that the issue of enhancing the benchmark for promotion is under active consideration of the Government and the modalities decided in the matter of promotion will be made applicable in the case of MACP.</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>2. This issues with the approval of Joint Secretary (Establishment).</p>
<p align="right">(Kuldeep Chaudhary)<br />
Section Officer<br />
Ph.No. 23040398</p>
<p>Source: Confederation</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://centralgovernmentnews.com/proposal-of-the-staff-side-to-record-disagreement-of-unsettled-6th-cpc-anomalies-and-to-refer-the-same-to-arbitrator-comments/">Proposal of the Staff Side to record disagreement of unsettled 6th CPC anomalies and to refer the same to Arbitrator Comments</a> appeared first on <a href="https://centralgovernmentnews.com">CENTRAL GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES NEWS</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://centralgovernmentnews.com/proposal-of-the-staff-side-to-record-disagreement-of-unsettled-6th-cpc-anomalies-and-to-refer-the-same-to-arbitrator-comments/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Anomalies in implementation of 6th CPC</title>
		<link>https://centralgovernmentnews.com/anomalies-in-implementation-of-6th-cpc/</link>
					<comments>https://centralgovernmentnews.com/anomalies-in-implementation-of-6th-cpc/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2018 11:53:20 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[6CPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[6th Central Pay Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[6th CPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[6th CPC anomalies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[implementation of 6th CPC]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://centralgovernmentnews.com/?p=20188</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Anomalies in implementation of 6th CPC A National Anomaly Committee, comprising 8 members from the Official-Side and 12 members from the Staff-Side was set up to settle the anomalies arising out of the implementation of the recommendations of the 6th Central Pay Commission. There were five (5) meetings of the National Anomaly Committee where 55 [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://centralgovernmentnews.com/anomalies-in-implementation-of-6th-cpc/">Anomalies in implementation of 6th CPC</a> appeared first on <a href="https://centralgovernmentnews.com">CENTRAL GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES NEWS</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Anomalies in implementation of 6th CPC</strong></p>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><img decoding="async" class=" aligncenter" title="Anomalies-implementation-6th-CPC" src="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-VW-uCGTBwaY/Wk5NYdA5paI/AAAAAAAACos/N8d5zIPU-J4D7ulc_32NaCmt7IQqQnARACLcBGAs/s1600/Anomalies-implementation-6th-CPC.jpg" alt="Anomalies-implementation-6th-CPC" border="0" data-original-height="314" data-original-width="600" /></div>
<p>A National Anomaly Committee, comprising 8 members from the Official-Side and 12 members from the Staff-Side was set up to settle the anomalies arising out of the implementation of the recommendations of the 6th Central Pay Commission.</p>
<p>There were five (5) meetings of the National Anomaly Committee where 55 anomalies were settled out of total 59 anomalies which were raised. The remaining 4 anomalies are pending finalisation.</p>
<p>A National Anomaly Committee comprising 9 members from the Official-Side and 13 members from the Staff-Side has been constituted to discuss the anomalies arising out of the implementation of the recommendations of the 7th Central Pay Commission. An agenda consisting of 18 items has been received from the Staff-Side for discussion which is under examination for convening the first meeting of the Committee.</p>
<p>This was stated by the Minister of State (Independent Charge) of the Ministry of Development of North Eastern Region (DoNER), MoS PMO, Personnel, Public Grievances &amp; Pensions, Atomic Energy and Space, Dr. Jitendra Singh in a written reply to question in the Rajya Sabha today.</p>
<p>PIB</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://centralgovernmentnews.com/anomalies-in-implementation-of-6th-cpc/">Anomalies in implementation of 6th CPC</a> appeared first on <a href="https://centralgovernmentnews.com">CENTRAL GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES NEWS</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://centralgovernmentnews.com/anomalies-in-implementation-of-6th-cpc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Resolution of Anomalies in the 6th CPC Report</title>
		<link>https://centralgovernmentnews.com/resolution-of-anomalies-in-the-6th-cpc-report/</link>
					<comments>https://centralgovernmentnews.com/resolution-of-anomalies-in-the-6th-cpc-report/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2017 13:49:19 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[6CPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[7CPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[6th CPC anomalies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[6th CPC Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[7th Central Pay Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[7th CPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sixth Central Pay Commission]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://centralgovernmentnews.com/?p=17282</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Resolution of Anomalies in the 6th CPC Report Recommendations of the Sixth Central Pay Commission (CPC) and several improvements made thereon by the Government have been largely well received by the armed forces personnel including ex-servicemen. Some issues regarding service conditions, pay, pension and allowances, including demand for non-functional upgradation, were subsequently received, which were [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://centralgovernmentnews.com/resolution-of-anomalies-in-the-6th-cpc-report/">Resolution of Anomalies in the 6th CPC Report</a> appeared first on <a href="https://centralgovernmentnews.com">CENTRAL GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES NEWS</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Resolution of Anomalies in the 6th CPC Report</strong></p>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><img decoding="async" title="RESOLUTION-ANOMALIES-6TH-CPC-7TH-CPC" src="https://3.bp.blogspot.com/--K-EyjCyt2U/WNFSsw3KEYI/AAAAAAAABv0/vjwJUNFzM_0RDwq3gDR6x48wCZQGvhi0ACLcB/s1600/RESOLUTION-ANOMALIES-6TH-CPC-7TH-CPC.jpg" alt="RESOLUTION-ANOMALIES-6TH-CPC-7TH-CPC" border="0" /></div>
<p>Recommendations of the Sixth Central Pay Commission (CPC) and several improvements made thereon by the Government have been largely well received by the armed forces personnel including ex-servicemen. Some issues regarding service conditions, pay, pension and allowances, including demand for non-functional upgradation, were subsequently received, which were examined by the Government on case to case basis.</p>
<p>Some of the pay concerns of armed forces personnel were also examined by a committee constituted under the chairmanship of Shri Pranab Mukherjee, the then Minister of External Affairs. The committee&#8217;s recommendation on placement of Lt Cols / equiv in Pay Band IV was accepted and implemented by the Government.</p>
<p>Thereafter, a committee was constituted under the chairmanship of the Cabinet Secretary in 2012, to examine certain pay and pension issues of armed forces personnel. All the recommendations of Cabinet Secretary Committee related to ex-servicemen were implemented. The Committee&#8217;s recommendations on pay related issues were referred to the 7th CPC.</p>
<p>The improvement of service conditions, pay, allowances and retirement benefits of armed forces personnel is a continuous process, which is examined in consultation with various stakeholders, and on case to case basis.</p>
<p>This information was given by Minister of State for Defence Dr. Subhash Bhamre in a written reply to Shri Rajeev Chandra Sekhar in Rajya Sabha today.</p>
<p>PIB</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://centralgovernmentnews.com/resolution-of-anomalies-in-the-6th-cpc-report/">Resolution of Anomalies in the 6th CPC Report</a> appeared first on <a href="https://centralgovernmentnews.com">CENTRAL GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES NEWS</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://centralgovernmentnews.com/resolution-of-anomalies-in-the-6th-cpc-report/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
