<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Minutes of the meeting with all the Heads of CPPCs / Government Business Divisions of SBI held on 10.01.2020 to discuss various issues	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://centralgovernmentnews.com/minutes-of-the-meeting-with-all-the-heads-of-cppcs-government-business-divisions-of-sbi-held-on-10-01-2020-to-discuss-various-issues/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://centralgovernmentnews.com/minutes-of-the-meeting-with-all-the-heads-of-cppcs-government-business-divisions-of-sbi-held-on-10-01-2020-to-discuss-various-issues/</link>
	<description>All about Central Government Employees News. Get the central govt employees latest news, DoPT Orders, 7th Pay Commission, DA Hike, latest notification for pensioners, MACP latest order, da for central government employees, and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2020 08:02:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: R SARANATHAN AND OTHERS		</title>
		<link>https://centralgovernmentnews.com/minutes-of-the-meeting-with-all-the-heads-of-cppcs-government-business-divisions-of-sbi-held-on-10-01-2020-to-discuss-various-issues/#comment-49859</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[R SARANATHAN AND OTHERS]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2020 08:02:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://centralgovernmentnews.com/?p=26216#comment-49859</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Sir,
   I was holding the post whose scale of pay was Rs.5500-9000 as per the 5th CPC. I retired on 30-4-2002 after serving 19 yrs in the same cadre WITHOUT ANY PROMOTION. The Fin.Min. Dept. of Expenditure in their letter OM date 21-4-2004 giving PROSPECTIVE EFFECT FROM 21-4-2004 OF THE UPGRADED SCALE OF THE POST AS RS.6500-10500.. I HAVE REPRESENTED THAT THE UPGRADED SCALE OF PAY OF RS. 6500-10500  HAS TO BE APPLIED TO ME TOO SINCE THE UP GRADATION OF THIS SCALE WAS PROLONGING SINCE 1999. AND AS I WAS IN SERVICE AND WORKED N THE SCALE OF PAY OF THE POST RS.5500-9000 FROM 1-1-1996 TILL 30-4-2002 FOR ABOUT 7 YRS. DATE ON WHICH I RETIRED ON SUPERANNUATION. BUT THE  ADMINISTRATION IS NOT CONSIDERING MY REQUEST TILL DATE. I HAVE REQUESTED FOR REVISION OF MY PAY IN THE UPGRADED SCALE OF RS. 6500-10500.  AS PER THE DOPT OM ISSUED ON 4-2-1992 WHEREIN IT HAD BEEN CLEARLY CLARIFIED FOR SUCH REVISION FROM THE DATE OF PUBLICATION OF THIS SCALE SUGGESTED BY THE 5 TH cpc IE. WEF 1-1-1996. THE ADMINISTRATION WAS WRITTEN A LETTER TO THEIR MEMBER-ADMN. ,CBOIC, ,MIIN. OF FIN. NEW DELHI ON 5-9-2019 TO ADDRESS THE DOPT ON THE APPLICABILITY OF THE UPGRADED SCALE IN MY CASE AND NOW IT IS MORE THAN 7 MONTHS NO INTIMATION HAD BEEN RECEIVED BY ME ABOUT THE REVISION OF MY PAY ND PENSION. MANY CPGRAMS, CPENGRAMS, AND PMOG HAD BEN REGISTERED BUT TILL DATE NO FINAL REPLY ON MY REQUEST. FOR REVISION OF MY PAY AND PENSION IN UPGRADED SCALE OF THE POST AS RS. 6500-10500.FROM ANYONE.
  I WISH TO POINT OUT THE OFFICER WHO WAS IN THE SCALE OF PAY OF RS.5000-9000 RETIRED ON 31-3-2004 WILL  RECEIVE PENSION IN THIS SCALE WHEREAS THE OFFICER IN THE SAME SCALE OF WHO RETIRED ON 30-4-2004 WILL RECEIVE PENSION IN THE UPGRADED SCALE OF PAY OF RS. 6500-10500 WITH THIS GREAT INJUSTICE BEING DONE BY THE ADMN. WHEN BOTH THE OFFICERS WERE WORKING IN THE SAME CADRE WITH EARLIER SCALE OF PAY OF RS.5500-120500 WHICH WAS UPGRADED AS RS. 6500-10500 WEF 21-.4.-2004. WITH 231 DAYS AFTER HIS RETIREMENT.  WITH  THIS PARITY  IN THE PAY AND PENSION.

 KINDLY CLARIFY HOW THIS COULD BE  AND IS IT NOT INJUSTICE  DONE TO THE OFFICER WHO RETIRED ON 31-3-2004  COMPARED WITH THE OFFICER RETIRED ON 30-4-2004? LIKE THIS PENSIONER.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sir,<br />
   I was holding the post whose scale of pay was Rs.5500-9000 as per the 5th CPC. I retired on 30-4-2002 after serving 19 yrs in the same cadre WITHOUT ANY PROMOTION. The Fin.Min. Dept. of Expenditure in their letter OM date 21-4-2004 giving PROSPECTIVE EFFECT FROM 21-4-2004 OF THE UPGRADED SCALE OF THE POST AS RS.6500-10500.. I HAVE REPRESENTED THAT THE UPGRADED SCALE OF PAY OF RS. 6500-10500  HAS TO BE APPLIED TO ME TOO SINCE THE UP GRADATION OF THIS SCALE WAS PROLONGING SINCE 1999. AND AS I WAS IN SERVICE AND WORKED N THE SCALE OF PAY OF THE POST RS.5500-9000 FROM 1-1-1996 TILL 30-4-2002 FOR ABOUT 7 YRS. DATE ON WHICH I RETIRED ON SUPERANNUATION. BUT THE  ADMINISTRATION IS NOT CONSIDERING MY REQUEST TILL DATE. I HAVE REQUESTED FOR REVISION OF MY PAY IN THE UPGRADED SCALE OF RS. 6500-10500.  AS PER THE DOPT OM ISSUED ON 4-2-1992 WHEREIN IT HAD BEEN CLEARLY CLARIFIED FOR SUCH REVISION FROM THE DATE OF PUBLICATION OF THIS SCALE SUGGESTED BY THE 5 TH cpc IE. WEF 1-1-1996. THE ADMINISTRATION WAS WRITTEN A LETTER TO THEIR MEMBER-ADMN. ,CBOIC, ,MIIN. OF FIN. NEW DELHI ON 5-9-2019 TO ADDRESS THE DOPT ON THE APPLICABILITY OF THE UPGRADED SCALE IN MY CASE AND NOW IT IS MORE THAN 7 MONTHS NO INTIMATION HAD BEEN RECEIVED BY ME ABOUT THE REVISION OF MY PAY ND PENSION. MANY CPGRAMS, CPENGRAMS, AND PMOG HAD BEN REGISTERED BUT TILL DATE NO FINAL REPLY ON MY REQUEST. FOR REVISION OF MY PAY AND PENSION IN UPGRADED SCALE OF THE POST AS RS. 6500-10500.FROM ANYONE.<br />
  I WISH TO POINT OUT THE OFFICER WHO WAS IN THE SCALE OF PAY OF RS.5000-9000 RETIRED ON 31-3-2004 WILL  RECEIVE PENSION IN THIS SCALE WHEREAS THE OFFICER IN THE SAME SCALE OF WHO RETIRED ON 30-4-2004 WILL RECEIVE PENSION IN THE UPGRADED SCALE OF PAY OF RS. 6500-10500 WITH THIS GREAT INJUSTICE BEING DONE BY THE ADMN. WHEN BOTH THE OFFICERS WERE WORKING IN THE SAME CADRE WITH EARLIER SCALE OF PAY OF RS.5500-120500 WHICH WAS UPGRADED AS RS. 6500-10500 WEF 21-.4.-2004. WITH 231 DAYS AFTER HIS RETIREMENT.  WITH  THIS PARITY  IN THE PAY AND PENSION.</p>
<p> KINDLY CLARIFY HOW THIS COULD BE  AND IS IT NOT INJUSTICE  DONE TO THE OFFICER WHO RETIRED ON 31-3-2004  COMPARED WITH THE OFFICER RETIRED ON 30-4-2004? LIKE THIS PENSIONER.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
