Comments on: 6th CPC implementation of MACP w.e.f 1st January 2006 with DoPT as it will give relief to pensioners retiring in the intervening period

By: Subhash Chander Bhatia

Subhash Chander Bhatia — Wed, 05 Jul 2023 07:52:50 +0000

As per my knowledge ,there are two orders of Hon’able S.C.regarding the date of implementation of MACP. In earlier order it was held that MACP BEING THE PART OF PAY STRUCTURE,CANT BE DEFFERRED ,SO, BE IMPLEMENTED FROM 01.01.2006. I n an other order the MACP was considerd as an alliance, so cold be defferred. What a fun with employees, particular the pension des who retired between 01.01.2006 and 01.09.2008.

By: SATYA NARAIN SHARMA

SATYA NARAIN SHARMA — Thu, 24 Nov 2022 05:37:18 +0000

THE DOP&T HAVE BEEN BIASED IN GRANTING MACP BENEFITS FROM 01.01.2006 DESPITE SUPREME COURT JUDGEMENT IN FAVOUR OF IMPLEMENTATION FROM 01.01.2006. SEPARATELY, HON’BLE SUPREME COURT ALSO RULED THAT IN ORDER TO PREVENT MULTIPLE LITIGATIONS ON SAME ISSUE, GOVT SHOULD IMPLEMENT JUDGEMENTS DELIVERED BY IT UNIFORMLY.
SIMILARLY DOP&T HAVE DENIED BENEFIT OF INCREMENT TO THOSE RETIRED ON 30TH JUNE DESPITE SUPREME COURT JUDGEMENT FOR GRANT OF ONE ADDITIONAL INCREMENT TO THOSE RETIRING ON 39TH JUNE AFTER COMPLETION OF FULL 12 MONTH SERVICE
DOP&T IS CERTAINLY BIASED AGAINST RETIRED EMPLOYEES

By: R.S.Rathore

R.S.Rathore — Thu, 29 Sep 2022 04:01:03 +0000

It is an agony of fate of central govt. pensioners who retired in between 1.1.2006 to 31.8.2008 who have been deprived of their legitimate demands of grant of MACP from 1.1.2006 since they were allowed the benefit of recommendations of 6th CPC from 1.1.2006 yet the benefit of MACP denied in contravention of various court orders including Apex court. The second legitimate demand was the grant of notional pay for the purpose of pensionery benefits to retirees of 30 th June after rendering 12 calendar months service & earning annual increment. These both legitimate demands were approved & recommended to the Dopt. for consideration & issuing necessary orders by the standing committee of the members of parliament yet same have not been found considered so far. The non acceptance of the recommendations of the parliamentary committee as well the various court orders does not seem to be inconsistent with the work ethics . It is therefore, requested that the head of the the nodal administrative agency may be kind enough to look in to the matter & arrange for immediate action in the matter..